Characterization of 3G Data-Plane Traffic and Application towards Centralized Control and Management for Software Defined Networking

With the wide deployment of 3G/4G cellular data networks there is a tremendous growth of mobile Internet access worldwide. We conduct a detailed measurement study about user behaviors, application usage and location patterns of users. We present a methodology that correlates different network attributes and user information together. For user behaviors we classify all users into four groups by time division and investigate the behaviors of different types of users. For example, we find that midnight users consume tremendous network bandwidth. We categorize applications into several groups and provide insights of each type of application usage about up/down flow user numbers and user request times. We also analyze the location information of users that reveal the relationship between network usages with user mobility. Our study successfully provides network operational insights with the details of network usage or the user remarkable behaviors that can help network planners and operators to plan and adaptively adjust network capacity assignment and flow or application management. Most importantly it will help service providers to reduce their operating cost and offer more flexible and variety of services to meet the needs of today's mobile clients without the need of increasing capacity in congested areas. Finally, our analysis will enable much more efficient routing and resource allocation management applications in the recent endeavor for software defined networking that will put such responsibility into the logically centralized controllers.

[1]  Craig E. Wills,et al.  Characteristics of Mobile Web Content , 2006, 2006 1st IEEE Workshop on Hot Topics in Web Systems and Technologies.

[2]  John C. S. Lui,et al.  A Panoramic View of 3G Data/Control-Plane Traffic: Mobile Device Perspective , 2012, Networking.

[3]  Aditya Akella,et al.  A Comparative Study of Handheld and Non-handheld Traffic in Campus Wi-Fi Networks , 2011, PAM.

[4]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  A first look at traffic on smartphones , 2010, IMC '10.

[5]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  Characterizing Alert and Browse Services of Mobile Clients , 2002, USENIX Annual Technical Conference, General Track.

[6]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  BLINC: multilevel traffic classification in the dark , 2005, SIGCOMM '05.

[7]  Patrick P. C. Lee,et al.  On the detection of signaling DoS attacks on 3G/WiMax wireless networks , 2009, Comput. Networks.

[8]  Patrick D. McDaniel,et al.  On Attack Causality in Internet-Connected Cellular Networks , 2007, USENIX Security Symposium.

[9]  Qiang Xu,et al.  Identifying diverse usage behaviors of smartphone apps , 2011, IMC '11.

[10]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[11]  Hannu Verkasalo,et al.  Empirical observations on the emergence of mobile multimedia services and applications in the U.S. and Europe , 2006, MUM '06.

[12]  Aleksandar Kuzmanovic,et al.  Measuring serendipity: connecting people, locations and interests in a mobile 3G network , 2009, IMC '09.

[13]  Carey L. Williamson,et al.  Characterization of CDMA2000 cellular data network traffic , 2005, The IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks 30th Anniversary (LCN'05)l.

[14]  Mikko V. J. Heikkinen,et al.  Measuring Mobile Peer-to-Peer Usage: Case Finland 2007 , 2009, PAM.

[15]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  Anatomizing application performance differences on smartphones , 2010, MobiSys '10.

[16]  F. Ricciato,et al.  Composition of GPRS / UMTS traffic : snapshots from a live network , 2005 .

[17]  Péter Benkö,et al.  A large-scale, passive analysis of end-to-end TCP performance over GPRS , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[18]  Fabio Ricciato,et al.  Bottleneck detection in UMTS via TCP passive monitoring: a real case , 2005, CoNEXT '05.

[19]  Pasi E. Lassila,et al.  Micro- and Macroscopic Analysis of RTT Variability in GPRS and UMTS Networks , 2006, Networking.

[20]  Antonio Nucci,et al.  Seeing the Difference in IP Traffic: Wireless Versus Wireline , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.