Effect of remote sensing spatial resolution on interpreting tower-based flux observations

Abstract Validation comparisons between satellite-based surface energy balance models and tower-based flux measurements over heterogeneous landscapes can be strongly influenced by the spatial resolution of the remote sensing inputs. In this paper, a two-source energy balance model developed to use thermal and visible /near-infrared remotely sensed data is applied to Landsat imagery collected during the 2004 Soil Moisture Experiment (SMEX04) conducted in southern Arizona. Using a two dimensional flux-footprint algorithm, modeled surface fluxes are compared to tower measurements at three locations in the SMEX04 study area: two upland sites, and one riparian site. The effect of pixel resolution on evaluating the performance of the land surface model and interpreting spatial variations of land surface fluxes over these heterogeneous areas is evaluated. Three Landsat scenes were examined, one representing the dry season and the other two representing the relatively wet monsoon season. The model was run at three resolution scales: namely the Landsat visible/near-infrared band resolution (30 m), the Landsat 5 thermal band resolution (120 m), and 960 m, which is nominally the MODIS thermal resolution at near-nadir. Comparisons between modeled and measured fluxes at the three tower sites showed good agreement at the 30 m and 120 m resolutions — pixel scales at which the source area influencing the tower measurement (∼ 100 m) is reasonably resolved. At 960 m, the agreement is relatively poor, especially for the latent heat flux, due to sub-pixel heterogeneity in land surface conditions at scales exceeding the tower footprint. Therefore in this particular landscape, thermal data at 1-km resolution are not useful in assessing the intrinsic accuracy of the land-surface model in comparison with tower fluxes. Furthermore, important spatial patterns in the landscape are lost at this resolution. Currently, there are no definite plans supporting high resolution thermal data with regular global coverage below ∼ 700 m after Landsat 5 and ASTER fail. This will be a serious problem for the application and validation of thermal-based land-surface models over heterogeneous landscapes.

[1]  G. Katul,et al.  Soil moisture and vegetation controls on evapotranspiration in a heterogeneous Mediterranean ecosystem on Sardinia, Italy , 2006 .

[2]  R. Eckman.  Re-examination of empirically derived formulas for horizontal diffusion from surface sources , 1994 .

[3]  D. C. Robertson,et al.  MODTRAN cloud and multiple scattering upgrades with application to AVIRIS , 1998 .

[4]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  ESTIMATING LAND SURFACE ENERGY BUDGETS FROM SPACE , 2004 .

[5]  William E. Emmerich,et al.  Carbon dioxide fluxes in a semiarid environment with high carbonate soils , 2003 .

[6]  G. Katul,et al.  An approximate analytical model for footprint estimation of scalar fluxes in thermally stratified atmospheric flows , 2000 .

[7]  N. U. Ahmed,et al.  Relations between evaporation coefficients and vegetation indices studied by model simulations , 1994 .

[8]  J. Norman,et al.  Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland , 2000 .

[9]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Effects of remote sensing pixel resolution on modeled energy flux variability of croplands in Iowa , 2004 .

[10]  Dale A. Quattrochi,et al.  Thermal Remote Sensing in Land Surface Processing , 2004 .

[11]  F. Wimmer,et al.  Some aspects of the energy balance closure problem , 2006 .

[12]  William P. Kustas,et al.  An intercomparison study on models of sensible heat flux over partial canopy surfaces with remotely sensed surface temperature , 1996 .

[13]  J. Norman,et al.  A Two-Source Energy Balance Approach Using Directional Radiometric Temperature Observations for Sparse Canopy Covered Surfaces , 2000 .

[14]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Interpretation of surface flux measurements in heterogeneous terrain during the Monsoon '90 experiment , 1994 .

[15]  C. Justice,et al.  Selecting the spatial resolution of satellite sensors required for global monitoring of land transformations , 1988 .

[16]  J. Norman,et al.  Evaluation of soil and vegetation heat flux predictions using a simple two-source model with radiometric temperatures for partial canopy cover , 1999 .

[17]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Variability of emissivity and surface temperature over a sparsely vegetated surface , 1994 .

[18]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Mapping surface energy fluxes with radiometric temperature. , 2003 .

[19]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Preface [to special section on Monsoon '90 Multidisciplinary Experiment] , 1994 .

[20]  T. Schmugge,et al.  Deriving land surface temperature from Landsat 5 and 7 during SMEX02/SMACEX , 2004 .

[21]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Upscaling fluxes from tower to landscape: Overlaying flux footprints on high-resolution (IKONOS) images of vegetation cover , 2004 .

[22]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Estimating subpixel surface temperatures and energy fluxes from the vegetation index-radiometric temperature relationship , 2003 .

[23]  Bhaskar J. Choudhury,et al.  Relationships between vegetation indices, radiation absorption, and net photosynthesis evaluated by a sensitivity analysis , 1987 .

[24]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Effects of Vegetation Clumping on Two–Source Model Estimates of Surface Energy Fluxes from an Agricultural Landscape during SMACEX , 2005 .

[25]  J. Norman,et al.  Source approach for estimating soil and vegetation energy fluxes in observations of directional radiometric surface temperature , 1995 .

[26]  W. J. Shuttleworth,et al.  Interannual and seasonal variation in fluxes of water and carbon dioxide from a riparian woodland ecosystem , 2004 .

[27]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Sensible heat flux - Radiometric surface temperature relationship for eight semiarid areas , 1994 .

[28]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  A Multiscale Remote Sensing Model for Disaggregating Regional Fluxes to Micrometeorological Scales , 2004 .

[29]  William P. Kustas,et al.  A vegetation index based technique for spatial sharpening of thermal imagery , 2007 .

[30]  William P. Kustas,et al.  Evaluating the effects of subpixel heterogeneity on pixel average fluxes. , 2000 .

[31]  David C. Goodrich,et al.  Preface paper to the Semi-Arid Land-Surface-Atmosphere (SALSA) Program special issue , 2000 .

[32]  M. Friedl,et al.  Diurnal Covariation in Soil Heat Flux and Net Radiation , 2003 .

[33]  M. S. Moran,et al.  The scaling characteristics of remotely-sensed variables for sparsely-vegetated heterogeneous landscapes , 1997 .

[34]  W. Kustas,et al.  Intercomparison of Spatially Distributed Models for Predicting Surface Energy Flux Patterns during SMACEX , 2005 .

[35]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Estimating land surface energy budgets from space: Review and current efforts at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and USDA-ARS , 2004 .

[36]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  Utility of Remote Sensing–Based Two-Source Energy Balance Model under Low- and High-Vegetation Cover Conditions , 2005 .

[37]  W. Oechel,et al.  Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites , 2002 .

[38]  Jean-Paul Lhomme,et al.  Sensible Heat Flux-Radiometric Surface Temperature Relationship Over Sparse Vegetation: Parameterizing B-1 , 2000, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[39]  Anne Verhoef,et al.  Some Practical Notes on the Parameter kB−1 for Sparse Vegetation , 1997 .