Informational masking for simultaneous nonspeech stimuli: psychometric functions for fixed and randomly mixed maskers.

Sensitivity d' and response bias beta were measured as a function of target level for the detection of a 1000-Hz tone in multitone maskers using a one interval, two-alternative forced-choice (1I-2AFC) paradigm. Ten such maskers, each with eight randomly selected components in the region 200-5000 Hz, with 800-1250 Hz excluded to form a protected zone, were presented under two conditions: the fixed condition, in which the same eight-component masker is used throughout an experimental run, and the random condition, in which an eight-component masker is chosen randomly trial-to-trial from the given set of ten such maskers. Differences between the results obtained with these two conditions help characterize the listener's susceptibility to informational masking (IM). The d' results show great intersubject variability, but can be reasonably well fit by simple energy-detector models in which internal noise and filter bandwidth are used as fitting parameters. In contrast, the beta results are not well fit by these models. In addition to presentation of new data and its relation to energy-detector models, this paper provides comments on a variety of issues, problems, and research needs in the IM area.

[1]  R A Lutfi,et al.  How much masking is informational masking? , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  G. Kidd,et al.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Note on informational masking (L) , 2003 .

[4]  R A Lutfi,et al.  Nonmonotonicity of informational masking. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Virginia M Richards,et al.  Cuing effects for informational masking. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  F. Wightman,et al.  Psychometric functions for children's detection of tones in noise. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  M R Leek,et al.  Learning to detect auditory pattern components. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  David M. Green,et al.  Detection of Auditory Sinusoids of Uncertain Frequency , 1961 .

[9]  D. L. Neff,et al.  Effective properties of multicomponent simultaneous maskers under conditions of uncertainty. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Charles S. Watson,et al.  Some comments on informational masking , 2005 .

[11]  Gerald Kidd,et al.  Multiple bursts, multiple looks, and stream coherence in the release from informational masking. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  H S Colburn,et al.  Detection of tones in reproducible narrow-band noise. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Robert A Lutfi,et al.  Psychometric functions for informational masking. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Informational masking for multicomponent maskers with spectral gaps. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  D L Neff Signal properties that reduce masking by simultaneous, random-frequency maskers. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  D. M. Green,et al.  Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  R L Freyman,et al.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  G. Kidd,et al.  Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Gerald Kidd,et al.  Combining energetic and informational masking for speech identification. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  B A Wright,et al.  Strategies used to detect auditory signals in small sets of random maskers. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Informational masking: counteracting the effects of stimulus uncertainty by decreasing target-masker similarity. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Laurel H Carney,et al.  Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers: I. Results for human. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  M R Leek,et al.  Auditory perceptual learning of tonal patterns , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  R H Gilkey,et al.  Effects of masker waveform and signal-to-masker phase relation on diotic and dichotic masking by reproducible noise. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Note on informational masking. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context-coding. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  C S Watson,et al.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. II. Selective attention and learning under various levels of stimulus uncertainty. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  L. Carney,et al.  Binaural detection with narrowband and wideband reproducible noise maskers: II. Results for rabbit. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  F. Wightman,et al.  Effects of signal and masker uncertainty on children's detection. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[32]  H S Colburn,et al.  Binaural processing of noisy stimuli: internal/external noise ratios for diotic and dichotic stimuli. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  D L Neff,et al.  Individual differences in simultaneous masking with random-frequency, multicomponent maskers. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  R A Lutfi A model of auditory pattern analysis based on component-relative-entropy. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  H S Colburn,et al.  Reducing informational masking by sound segregation. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  R L Freyman,et al.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Virginia M Richards,et al.  Informational masking with small set sizes. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Examination of a linear model in an informational masking study. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Intensity discrimination in the presence of random-frequency, multicomponent maskers and broadband noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  M. Ericson,et al.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  Robert A Lutfi,et al.  One factor underlies individual differences in auditory informational masking within and across age groups , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.