Hazard Analysis and Safety Requirements for Small Drone Operations: To What Extent Do Popular Drones Embed Safety?

Currently, published risk analyses for drones refer mainly to commercial systems, use data from civil aviation, and are based on probabilistic approaches without suggesting an inclusive list of hazards and respective requirements. Within this context, this article presents: (1) a set of safety requirements generated from the application of the systems theoretic process analysis (STPA) technique on a generic small drone system; (2) a gap analysis between the set of safety requirements and the ones met by 19 popular drone models; (3) the extent of the differences between those models, their manufacturers, and the countries of origin; and (4) the association of drone prices with the extent they meet the requirements derived by STPA. The application of STPA resulted in 70 safety requirements distributed across the authority, manufacturer, end user, or drone automation levels. A gap analysis showed high dissimilarities regarding the extent to which the 19 drones meet the same safety requirements. Statistical results suggested a positive correlation between drone prices and the extent that the 19 drones studied herein met the safety requirements generated by STPA, and significant differences were identified among the manufacturers. This work complements the existing risk assessment frameworks for small drones, and contributes to the establishment of a commonly endorsed international risk analysis framework. Such a framework will support the development of a holistic and methodologically justified standardization scheme for small drone flights.

[1]  T.D. Hall,et al.  SAFETY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE ( UAV ) COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[2]  Graham Wild,et al.  A Post-Accident Analysis of Civil Remotely-Piloted Aircraft System Accidents and Incidents , 2017 .

[3]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A systems approach to risk management through leading safety indicators , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Reece A. Clothier,et al.  Safety risk management of unmanned aircraft systems , 2015 .

[5]  Kimon P. Valavanis,et al.  On Integrating Unmanned Aircraft Systems into the National Airspace System: Issues, Challenges, Operational Restrictions, Certification, and Recommendations , 2011 .

[6]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety , 2012 .

[7]  Chris W. Johnson.  The Hidden Human Factors in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2008 .

[8]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[9]  Nektarios Karanikas,et al.  How Completely and Similarly Do Safety Authorities Address Hazards Posed by New Technology? A Paradigm from Small-drone Operations , 2016 .

[10]  Mehran Nosratollahi,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of UAV under Uncertainty , 2017 .

[11]  R. Loh,et al.  UAVs in civil airspace: Safety requirements , 2009, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[12]  Hak-Tae Lee,et al.  Engineering Notes Probabilistic Safety Assessment of Unmanned Aerial System Operations , 2013 .

[13]  四井 賢一郎,et al.  THE WINDOWS , 1998, Voices of Modern Greece.

[14]  Nektarios Karanikas,et al.  Application of STPA on Small Drone Operations: A Benchmarking Approach , 2017 .