Parameterised Laws for Robust Guidance and Control of Planetary Landers

Planetary descent and landing on small planetary bodies are very scientifically rewarding exploration missions but also very challenging from an engineering perspective. This is mostly due to the perturbed and poorly known (physical, gravitational and magnetic) characteristics of the bodies, but also as demonstrated by the European Rosetta mission by the long-time degradation effects of the spacecraft subsystems. In order to address this challenge, the Space community has recognized the need to use robust spacecraft guidance and control algorithms. Of particular relevance, the newly-developed structured H∞ design and tuning framework is specially suitable for industry-oriented applications. Specifically for the aforementioned type of Space missions the availability of a fixed GNC architecture coupled with the use of a methodological tuning process and tools is considered a very desirable axis for improvement. In order to apply this GNC tuning advanced tools a structural framework well connected with the industrial state-of-practice and legacy knowledge is required. This paper presents such a parameterised structure for the small planetary bodies’ descent and landing exploratory missions, and shows that it reconciles the state-of-the-art in closed-loop guidance techniques. P. Simplı́cio and A. Marcos Technology for Aerospace Control, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK e-mail: pedro.simplicio/andres.marcos @bristol.ac.uk E. Joffre, M. Zamaro and N. Silva Airbus Defence and Space Ltd, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage SG1 2AS, UK e-mail: eric.joffre/mattia.zamaro.external/nuno.silva @airbus.com ∗ This work is jointly funded by the UK Space Agency through a 2016 NSTP-2 Space Technology Fast Track grant entitled ”Robust and Nonlinear Guidance and Control for Landing on Small Bodies”, as well as by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)

[1]  Roberto Furfaro,et al.  Asteroid Precision Landing via Multiple Sliding Surfaces Guidance Techniques , 2013 .

[2]  Bong Wie,et al.  Terminal-Phase Guidance and Control Analysis of Asteroid Interceptors , 2010 .

[3]  Jules Simo,et al.  Terminal Multiple Surface Sliding Guidance for Planetary Landing: Development, Tuning and Optimization via Reinforcement Learning , 2015 .

[4]  Christopher N. D'Souza,et al.  AN OPTIMAL GUIDANCE LAW FOR PLANETARY LANDING , 1997 .

[5]  Paul Zarchan,et al.  Tactical and strategic missile guidance , 1990 .

[6]  Edward C. Wong,et al.  Guidance and Control Design for Hazard Avoidance and Safe Landing on Mars , 2006 .

[7]  Daniel J. Scheeres,et al.  Stability bounds for three-dimensional motion close to asteroids , 2002 .

[8]  Pierre Apkarian,et al.  Parametric Robust Structured Control Design , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[9]  M. Lavagna,et al.  SEMI-ANALYTICAL ADAPTIVE GUIDANCE ALGORITHM FOR FAST RETARGETING MANEUVERS COMPUTATION DURING PLANETARY DESCENT AND LANDING , 2013 .

[10]  Jules Simo,et al.  Development of non-linear guidance algorithms for asteroids close-proximity operations , 2013 .

[11]  Stephan Ulamec,et al.  Rosetta Lander: On-Comet Operations Preparation and Planning , 2014 .

[12]  Roberto Furfaro,et al.  Non-linear Sliding Guidance algorithms for precision lunar landing , 2011 .

[13]  Allan R. Klumpp,et al.  Apollo lunar descent guidance , 1974, Autom..

[14]  S. Ploen,et al.  A Powered Descent Guidance Algorithm for Mars Pinpoint Landing , 2005 .

[15]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust and optimal control , 1995, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[16]  D. Vallado Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications , 1997 .

[17]  Pierre Apkarian,et al.  Structured H∞ Synthesis in MATLAB , 2011 .

[18]  D. G. Kubitschek Impactor spacecraft targeting for the Deep Impact mission to comet Tempel 1 , 2003 .

[19]  R. Battin An introduction to the mathematics and methods of astrodynamics , 1987 .

[20]  Andres Marcos,et al.  LPV Modeling, Analysis and Design in Space Systems: Rationale, Objectives and Limitations , 2009 .

[21]  Behrouz Ebrahimi,et al.  Optimal sliding-mode guidance with terminal velocity constraint for fixed-interval propulsive maneuvers , 2008 .

[22]  Dante S. Lauretta,et al.  An Overview of the OSIRIS-REx Asteroid Sample Return Mission , 2012 .

[23]  Yanning Guo,et al.  AAS 11-531 GUIDANCE ALGORITHMS FOR ASTEROID INTERCEPT MISSIONS WITH PRECISION TARGETING REQUIREMENTS , 2011 .

[24]  Masashi Uo,et al.  Hayabusa-final autonomous descent and landing based on target marker tracking , 2006 .

[25]  Yanning Guo,et al.  Spacecraft Guidance Algorithms for Asteroid Intercept and Rendezvous Missions , 2012 .

[26]  Yanning Guo,et al.  Applications of Generalized Zero-Effort-Miss/Zero-Effort-Velocity Feedback Guidance Algorithm , 2013 .

[27]  J. Gil-Fernández,et al.  Impacting small Near Earth Objects , 2008 .

[28]  Xiuqiang Jiang,et al.  Review and prospect of guidance and control for Mars atmospheric entry , 2014 .

[29]  Christelle Pittet,et al.  Systematic design methods of robust and structured controllers for satellites , 2015 .