Evolution of the digital biomarker ecosystem

The pursuit of digital biomarkers wherein signal outputs from biosensors are collated to inform health-care decisions continues to evolve at a rapid pace. In the field of neurodegenerative disorders, a goal is to augment subjective patient-reported inputs with patient-independent verifiable data that can be used to recommend interventive measures. For example, in the case of Alzheimer's disease, such tools might preselect patients in the presymptomatic and prodromal phases for definitive positron emission tomographic analysis, allowing accurate staging of disease and providing a reference point for subsequent therapeutic and other measures. Selection of appropriate and meaningful digital biomarkers to pursue, however, requires deep understanding of the disease state and its ecological relationship to the instrumental activities of daily living scale. Similar opportunities and challenges exist in a number of other chronic disease states including Parkinson's, Huntington's, and Duchenne's disease, multiple sclerosis, and cardiovascular disease. This review will highlight progress in device technology, the need for holistic approaches for data inputs, and regulatory pathways for adoption. The review focuses on published work from the period 2012–2017 derived from online searches of the most widely used abstracting portals.

[1]  Seok Hyun Yun,et al.  Contact Lens Sensors in Ocular Diagnostics , 2015, Advanced healthcare materials.

[2]  Ieuan Clay,et al.  Physical Activity Monitoring in Patients with Neurological Disorders: A Review of Novel Body-Worn Devices , 2017, Digital Biomarkers.

[3]  Max A. Little,et al.  Wearable Sensors in Huntington Disease: A Pilot Study. , 2016, Journal of Huntington's disease.

[4]  Daphne Zohar,et al.  Building a business model in digital medicine , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Nathan D. Price,et al.  Promoting Wellness & Demystifying Disease: The 100K Project , 2014 .

[6]  S. Amur,et al.  Biomarker Qualification: Toward a Multiple Stakeholder Framework for Biomarker Development, Regulatory Acceptance, and Utilization , 2015, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[7]  Derek Tseng,et al.  Targeted DNA sequencing and in situ mutation analysis using mobile phone microscopy , 2017, Nature Communications.

[8]  Phillip Won,et al.  A soft, wearable microfluidic device for the capture, storage, and colorimetric sensing of sweat , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[9]  C. Dufouil,et al.  Incidence of Dementia over Three Decades in the Framingham Heart Study. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  P. Boksa,et al.  A way forward for research on biomarkers for psychiatric disorders. , 2013, Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN.

[11]  T. Peters-Strickland,et al.  Optimization of a Digital Medicine System in Psychiatry. , 2016, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[12]  F. Kramer,et al.  Molecular and Digital Biomarker Supported Decision Making in Clinical Studies in Cardiovascular Indications , 2016, Archiv der Pharmazie.

[13]  J. Severinghaus,et al.  Dark Skin Decreases the Accuracy of Pulse Oximeters at Low Oxygen Saturation: The Effects of Oximeter Probe Type and Gender , 2007, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[14]  Michael G. Bennett,et al.  Getting nano tattoos right - a checklist of legal and ethical hurdles for an emerging nanomedical technology. , 2013, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[15]  L. Thurfjell,et al.  Amyloid PET imaging in Alzheimer’s disease: a comparison of three radiotracers , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[16]  Max A. Little,et al.  Technology in Parkinson's disease: Challenges and opportunities , 2016, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[17]  Gordon Bell,et al.  The body electric , 1997, CACM.

[18]  Bruce W Bode,et al.  Safety of a Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery System in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes. , 2016, JAMA.

[19]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks , 2017, Nature.

[20]  Martin Leahy,et al.  Investigating a smartphone imaging unit for photoplethysmography , 2010, Physiological measurement.

[21]  R. Thiele,et al.  Advances in photoplethysmography: beyond arterial oxygen saturation , 2015, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.

[22]  Heather A Clark,et al.  Nanosensors and nanomaterials for monitoring glucose in diabetes. , 2010, Trends in molecular medicine.

[23]  R. Romashko,et al.  A new look at the essence of the imaging photoplethysmography , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Ji-Young An,et al.  Wearable technologies, health and well-being: A case review , 2017 .

[25]  Miklós Emri,et al.  Changes in the Chemical Barrier Composition of Tears in Alzheimer’s Disease Reveal Potential Tear Diagnostic Biomarkers , 2016, PloS one.

[26]  A. Prince,et al.  Gamma‐Glutamyltransferase as a Potential Surrogate Marker for Detection of the Non‐A, Non‐B Carrier State , 1988, Vox sanguinis.

[27]  Sandeep Kumar Vashist,et al.  Commercial Smartphone-Based Devices and Smart Applications for Personalized Healthcare Monitoring and Management , 2014, Diagnostics.

[28]  Yan Wang,et al.  Foreign Body Reaction to Implantable Biosensors , 2015, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[29]  G. Tucker Personalized Drug Dosage – Closing the Loop , 2016, Pharmaceutical Research.

[30]  David John Wortley The consumerization of digital medicine , 2016 .

[31]  G. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Elastic Compressible Energy Storage Devices from Ice Templated Polymer Gels treated with Polyphenols , 2017 .

[32]  Suchi Saria,et al.  High Frequency Remote Monitoring of Parkinson's Disease via Smartphone: Platform Overview and Medication Response Detection , 2016, ArXiv.

[33]  J. H. Shaper,et al.  Serum UDP‐galactosyl transferase as a potential biomarker for breast carcinoma , 1980, Journal of surgical oncology.

[34]  Max A. Little,et al.  Large-Scale Wearable Sensor Deployment in Parkinson’s Patients: The Parkinson@Home Study Protocol , 2016, JMIR research protocols.

[35]  Roy H Perlis,et al.  First experience with a wireless system incorporating physiologic assessments and direct confirmation of digital tablet ingestions in ambulatory patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. , 2013, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[36]  Toshiyo Tamura,et al.  Wearable Photoplethysmographic Sensors—Past and Present , 2014 .

[37]  E. Ray Dorsey A Digital Journal for a Digital Era , 2017, Digital Biomarkers.

[38]  E. Ray Dorsey,et al.  Verily and Its Approach to Digital Biomarkers , 2017, Digital Biomarkers.

[39]  E Ray Dorsey,et al.  Potential reliability and validity of a modified version of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale that could be administered remotely. , 2013, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[40]  C. Wrann FNDC5/Irisin – Their Role in the Nervous System and as a Mediator for Beneficial Effects of Exercise on the Brain , 2015, Brain plasticity.

[41]  R. Klopfleisch,et al.  The pathology of the foreign body reaction against biomaterials. , 2017, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[42]  Sebastian Funke,et al.  Tears as a source of biomarkers for ocular and systemic diseases. , 2013, Experimental eye research.

[43]  R. Sperling,et al.  The Feasibility of At-Home iPad Cognitive Testing For Use in Clinical Trials. , 2016, The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease.

[44]  H Hsiu,et al.  Effects of different contacting pressure on the transfer function between finger photoplethysmographic and radial blood pressure waveforms , 2011, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[45]  Haomiao Jia,et al.  A single-center randomized, controlled trial investigating the efficacy of a mHealth ECG technology intervention to improve the detection of atrial fibrillation: the iHEART study protocol , 2016, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.

[46]  D. Heldman,et al.  Wearable Sensors for Advanced Therapy Referral in Parkinson's Disease. , 2016, Journal of Parkinson's disease.

[47]  W B Runciman,et al.  Potential errors in pulse oximetry III: Effects of interference, dyes, dyshaemoglobins and other pigments * , 1991, Anaesthesia.

[48]  Karthik Dinesh,et al.  Multiple Wearable Sensors in Parkinson and Huntington Disease Individuals: A Pilot Study in Clinic and at Home , 2017, Digital Biomarkers.

[49]  Sven Meister,et al.  Digital health and digital biomarkers – enabling value chains on health data , 2016 .

[50]  C. Boone,et al.  Intraepithelial neoplasia, surrogate endpoint biomarkers, and cancer chemoprevention , 1993, Journal of cellular biochemistry. Supplement.

[51]  Yan Wang,et al.  Polymeric "smart" coatings to prevent foreign body response to implantable biosensors. , 2013, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[52]  Lauren M. Huyett,et al.  Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas Systems: Engineering the Algorithms , 2014, Diabetes Care.