Smartphone photography utilized to measure wrist range of motion

The purpose was to determine if smartphone photography is a reliable tool in measuring wrist movement. Smartphones were used to take digital photos of both wrists in 32 normal participants (64 wrists) at extremes of wrist motion. The smartphone measurements were compared with clinical goniometry measurements. There was a very high correlation between the clinical goniometry and smartphone measurements, as the concordance coefficients were high for radial deviation, ulnar deviation, wrist extension and wrist flexion. The Pearson coefficients also demonstrated the high precision of the smartphone measurements. The Bland–Altman plots demonstrated 29–31 of 32 smartphone measurements were within the 95% confidence interval of the clinical measurements for all positions of the wrists. There was high reliability between the photography taken by the volunteer and researcher, as well as high inter-observer reliability. Smartphone digital photography is a reliable and accurate tool for measuring wrist range of motion. Level of evidence: II

[1]  Tony Delamothe,et al.  What next for electronic communication and health care? , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Francesco Sartorio,et al.  Reliability of a smartphone-based goniometer for knee joint goniometry , 2013, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[3]  R. Wootton,et al.  Can the Internet be used as a medium to evaluate knee angle? , 2003, Manual therapy.

[4]  S. Azen,et al.  Reliability of goniometric measurements. , 1978, Physical therapy.

[5]  Neville Thompson,et al.  Measurement of knee joint motion using digital imaging , 2008, International Orthopaedics.

[6]  Tae Seob Kim,et al.  A Study on the Measurement of Wrist Motion Range Using the iPhone 4 Gyroscope Application , 2014, Annals of plastic surgery.

[7]  D. Altman,et al.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading , 1995, The Lancet.

[8]  A. Armstrong,et al.  Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm. , 1998, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[9]  S. O’Driscoll,et al.  Validation of a photography-based goniometry method for measuring joint range of motion. , 2012, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[10]  Emiel van Trijffel,et al.  Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological range of motion of upper extremity joints is better if instruments are used: a systematic review. , 2010, Journal of physiotherapy.

[11]  A. Shin,et al.  A Comparison of Elbow Range of Motion Measurements: Smartphone-Based Digital Photography Versus Goniometric Measurements. , 2016, The Journal of hand surgery.

[12]  J M Rothstein,et al.  Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Shoulder measurements. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[13]  Per Egil Kummervold,et al.  Electronic patient-provider communication: Will it offset office visits and telephone consultations in primary care? , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[14]  Marese Cooney,et al.  Procedural considerations for photographic-based joint angle measurements. , 2005, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[15]  A. Daluiski.  Validity of Goniometric Elbow Measurements: Comparative Study with a Radiographic Method , 2012 .

[16]  Scott W Wolfe,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study. , 2009, The Journal of hand surgery.

[17]  Rajat Mittal,et al.  Validity and reliability of using photography for measuring knee range of motion: a methodological study , 2011, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[18]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Clinical measurement of range of motion. Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[19]  Morad Askari,et al.  Comparative analysis of photograph-based clinical goniometry to standard techniques , 2015, Hand.

[20]  J. M. Rothstein,et al.  Goniometric Reliability in a Clinical Setting , 1983 .

[21]  Johan Bellemans,et al.  Are clinical photographs appropriate to determine the maximal range of motion of the knee? , 2010, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[22]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.