Perceptions of Cockpit Configurations: A Culture and Gender Analysis

ABSTRACT Objective: With the advancement of technology in recent years the topic of autonomous, pilotless cockpits have emerged. The rhetoric of this article revolves around passenger perceptions and their willingness to fly on board such aircraft. Background: Although studies have been conducted to gauge similar consumer perceptions, this study compared 3 different 2-pilot configurations based on pilot gender to that of the autonomous or automated cockpit. These configurations included 2 male pilots, 1 male and 1 female pilot, and 2 female pilots. Method: 433 participants from India and the United States were recruited using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk and responded to questions designed to measure consumer perceptions on the topic at hand. The study used Rice, Mehta, et al.’s (2015) willingness-to-fly scale to collect the data. Results: The results suggested that all participants were more willing to fly on board all 3 types of 2-pilot configurations as opposed to the autonomous cockpit. However, Indian male participants showed a decrease in willingness to fly on board the 2-female-pilot configurations as opposed to the other 2-human-pilot configurations. Additionally, U.S. participants were much less willing to fly on board the autonomous configuration as compared to their Indian counterparts. Conclusion: The findings suggest that all participants were least willing to fly on aircraft flown completely by an autopilot. Differences were also noted based on pilot gender.

[2]  Timothy G. Rosser,et al.  Passengers from India and the United States Have Differential Opinions about Autonomous Auto-Pilots for Commercial Flights , 2014 .

[3]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[4]  Timothy G. Rosser,et al.  Indian and American consumer perceptions of cockpit configuration policy , 2015 .

[5]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[6]  S. Rice,et al.  Traveller Perceptions of Trust in Air Traffic Controllers: A Cultural Comparison between India and the United States , 2016 .

[7]  R. Helmreich Culture and error in space: implications from analog environments. , 2000, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[8]  W. Stroebe,et al.  Stereotype, Prejudice, and Discrimination: Changing Conceptions in Theory and Research , 1989 .

[9]  D. Hamilton Conceptual Approaches to Stereotypes and Stereotyping , 2015 .

[10]  S. Rice,et al.  How Do Depression Medications Taken By Pilots Affect Passengers' Willingness to Fly? A Mediation Analysis , 2015 .

[11]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[12]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[13]  Mattie N. Milner,et al.  A longitudinal study on the alteration of consumer perceptions and the use of pilot medication , 2017 .

[14]  Alexandra Kristovics,et al.  Gender Issues in Aviation: Pilot Perceptions and Employment Relations , 2006 .