Audit method suited for DSS in clinical environment.

This chapter presents a novel online method to audit predictive models using a Bayesian perspective. The auditing model has been specifically designed for Decision Support Systems (DSSs) suited for clinical or research environments. Taking as starting point the working diagnosis supplied by the clinician, this method compares and evaluates the predictive skills of those models able to answer to that diagnosis. The approach consists in calculating the posterior odds of a model through the composition of a prior odds, a static odds, and a dynamic odds. To do so, this method estimates the posterior odds from the cases that the comparing models had in common during the design stage and from the cases already viewed by the DSS after deployment in the clinical site. In addition, if an ontology of the classes is available, this method can audit models answering related questions, which offers a reinforcement to the decisions the user already took and gives orientation on further diagnostic steps.The main technical novelty of this approach lies in the design of an audit model adapted to suit the decision workflow of a clinical environment. The audit model allows deciding what is the classifier that best suits each particular case under evaluation and allows the detection of possible misbehaviours due to population differences or data shifts in the clinical site. We show the efficacy of our method for the problem of brain tumor diagnosis with Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS).

[1]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[2]  H. Warner,et al.  A mathematical approach to medical diagnosis. Application to congenital heart disease. , 1961, JAMA.

[3]  William Nick Street,et al.  A streaming ensemble algorithm (SEA) for large-scale classification , 2001, KDD '01.

[4]  Ryszard S. Michalski,et al.  Incremental learning with partial instance memory , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[5]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A unifying view on dataset shift in classification , 2012, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Stephan Dreiseitl,et al.  Do physicians value decision support? A look at the effect of decision support systems on physician opinion , 2005, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[7]  R A Miller,et al.  The Demise of the “Greek Oracle” Model for Medical Diagnostic Systems , 1990, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[8]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  Pieter Wesseling,et al.  Comparison between neuroimaging classifications and histopathological diagnoses using an international multicenter brain tumor magnetic resonance imaging database. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  R. Fisher THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .

[11]  Salvador Tortajada,et al.  Incremental Gaussian Discriminant Analysis based on Graybill and Deal weighted combination of estimators for brain tumour diagnosis , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[12]  A. W. Simonetti,et al.  Development of a decision support system for diagnosis and grading of brain tumours using in vivo magnetic resonance single voxel spectra , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[13]  Paul M. Taylor,et al.  Research Paper: Measuring the Impact of Diagnostic Decision Support on the Quality of Clinical Decision Making: Development of a Reliable and Valid Composite Score , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  D. Louis WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system , 2007 .

[15]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  The effect of combining two echo times in automatic brain tumor classification by MRS , 2008, NMR in biomedicine.

[16]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Multiproject–multicenter evaluation of automatic brain tumor classification by magnetic resonance spectroscopy , 2008, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[17]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Bayesian Interpolation , 1992, Neural Computation.

[18]  Jan Luts,et al.  Effect of feature extraction for brain tumor classification based on short echo time 1H MR spectra , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  H. Shimodaira,et al.  Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function , 2000 .

[20]  Daniel S. Hirschberg,et al.  Small Sample Statistics for Classification Error Rates I: Error Rate Measurements , 1996 .

[21]  D G Altman,et al.  What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? , 2000, Statistics in medicine.