CO2 Capture Cost Reduction: Use of a Multiscale Simulations Strategy for a Multiscale Issue

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is one important option for CO2 mitigation (International Energy Agency, 2009) . Post-combustion capture processes using amines are considered one of the preferred options for CCS. However, the cost of avoided CO2 is very large and must be reduced. The present article aims to show that combining different simulation tools used on different scales makes possible afine analysis of CO2 capture costs and the associatedparameters responsible for these costs on different scales. It is first shown, from a macro-scale techno-economic analysis, that investments represent about one half of the total CO2 cost. Focusing on this cost, a sensitivity analysis, via Aspen calculations performed on a meso-column scale, enables one to identify key mass-transfer parameters that control absorption column design. It is shown that the most important mass-transfer parameter is the interfacial area, the gas and liquid mass transfer coefficients having almost no influence. Finally, from CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics ) simulations performed both on a large and on a local scale, some insights are given in order to optimize column design, first via the determination of large-scale distributor/packed bed interactions, and second via the determination of local pressure drop or local mass transfer parameters. It is also discussed how simulations should be performed on different scales in a two-way coupling approach in order to ensure fruitful results in the development of new technologies and further in CO2 capture cost reduction.

[1]  Véronique Roig,et al.  Experimental study of liquid spreading in structured packings , 2012 .

[2]  Arvo Lannus,et al.  Gas‐Liquid Reactions , 1970 .

[3]  S. Zaleski,et al.  DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF FREE-SURFACE AND INTERFACIAL FLOW , 1999 .

[4]  Pascal Mougin,et al.  High throughput screening of amine thermodynamic properties applied to post-combustion CO2 capture process evaluation , 2011 .

[5]  Nikolai Kolev,et al.  Comparison of the effective area of some highly effective packings , 2007 .

[6]  David Rouzineau,et al.  Mass transfer and hydrodynamic characteristics of new carbon carbon packing: Application to CO2 post-combustion capture , 2011 .

[7]  Graeme Puxty,et al.  Carbon dioxide postcombustion capture: a novel screening study of the carbon dioxide absorption performance of 76 amines. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Jacob Nygaard Knudsen,et al.  Experience with CO2 capture from coal flue gas in pilot-scale: Testing of different amine solvents , 2009 .

[9]  Ludovic Raynal,et al.  A multi-scale approach for CFD calculations of gas–liquid flow within large size column equipped with structured packing , 2007 .

[10]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Absorber model for CO2 capture by monoethanolamine - application to CASTOR pilot results , 2009 .

[11]  F. J. Zuiderweg,et al.  Small scale and large scale liquid maldistribution in packed columns , 1986 .

[12]  F. J. Zuiderweg,et al.  Radial liquid spread and maldistribution in packed columns under different wetting conditions , 1978 .

[13]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  Pressure drop through structured packings: Breakdown into the contributing mechanisms by CFD modeling , 2003 .

[14]  Kaj Thomsen,et al.  Chilled ammonia process for CO2 capture , 2009 .

[15]  Ludovic Raynal,et al.  Liquid Holdup and Pressure Drop Determination in Structured Packing with CFD Simulations , 2008 .

[16]  Dominique Legendre,et al.  Mass transfer and liquid hold-up determination in structured packing by CFD , 2012 .

[17]  Anshu Nanoti,et al.  Post combustion capture of CO2. , 2010 .

[18]  Hans-Jörg Bart,et al.  Experimental and CFD Simulation Study for the Wetting of a Structured Packing Element with Liquids , 2006 .

[19]  James R. Fair,et al.  Distillation Columns Containing Structured Packings: A Comprehensive Model for Their Performance. 2. Mass-Transfer Model , 1996 .

[20]  Günter Wozny,et al.  Texture influence on liquid-side mass transfer , 2011 .

[21]  Satish Reddy,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of the chilled-ammonia process for CO2 capture using thermodynamic analysis and process simulation ☆ , 2010 .

[22]  Adrien Gomez,et al.  From MEA to demixing solvents and future steps, a roadmap for lowering the cost of post-combustion carbon capture , 2011 .

[23]  Sholeh Ma’mun,et al.  Selection of new absorbents for carbon dioxide capture , 2004 .

[24]  Ludovic Raynal,et al.  Pressure drop and mass transfer of a high capacity random packing. Application to CO2 post-combustion capture , 2009 .

[25]  R. Higbie,et al.  The Rate of Absorption of a Pure Gas into a Still Liquid during Short Periods of Exposure , 1935 .

[26]  G. Versteeg,et al.  CO2 capture from power plants. Part I: A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine , 2007 .

[27]  Pascal Mougin,et al.  New IFP optimized first generation process for post-combustion carbon capture: HiCapt+™ , 2011 .

[28]  Günter Wozny,et al.  On the track to understanding three phases in one tower , 2007 .

[29]  F. Nicoud,et al.  Subgrid-Scale Stress Modelling Based on the Square of the Velocity Gradient Tensor , 1999 .

[30]  Dominique Legendre,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of reactive absorption in gas–liquid flow on structured packing using interface capturing method , 2010 .

[31]  U. Piomelli,et al.  LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION: PRESENT STATE AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES , 1998 .

[32]  Finn Andrew Tobiesen,et al.  Experimental validation of a rigorous absorber model for CO2 postcombustion capture , 2007 .

[33]  Dominique Legendre,et al.  Volume of fluid method for interfacial reactive mass transfer: Application to stable liquid film , 2010 .

[34]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Effective Gas/Liquid Contact Area of Packing for CO2 absoprtion/stripping , 2005 .