Rapid fabrication and screening of tailored functional 3D biomaterials.

Three dimensional synthetic polymer scaffolds have remarkable chemical and mechanical tunability in addition to biocompatibility. However, the chemical and physical space is vast in view of the number of variables that can be altered e.g. chemical composition, porosity, pore size and mechanical properties to name but a few. Here, we report the development of an array of 3D polymer scaffolds, whereby the physical and chemical properties of the polymer substrates were controlled, characterized in parallel (e.g. micro-CT scanning of 24 samples) and biological properties screened. This approach allowed the screening of 48 different polymer scaffolds constructed in situ by means of freeze-casting and photo-polymerisation with the tunable composition and 3D architecture of the polymer scaffolds facilitating the identification of optimal 3D biomaterials. As a proof of concept, the array approach was used to identify 3D polymers that were capable of supporting cell growth while controlling their behaviour. Sitting alongside classical polymer microarray technology, this novel platform reduces the gap between the identification of a biomaterial in 2D and its subsequent 3D application.

[1]  S. Oh,et al.  Wide-range stiffness gradient PVA/HA hydrogel to investigate stem cell differentiation behavior. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[2]  Nic D. Leipzig,et al.  The effect of substrate stiffness on adult neural stem cell behavior. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[3]  R. Ritchie,et al.  Bioinspired large-scale aligned porous materials assembled with dual temperature gradients , 2015, Science Advances.

[4]  Aleksandra K. Denisin,et al.  Tuning the Range of Polyacrylamide Gel Stiffness for Mechanobiology Applications. , 2016, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[5]  Mark Bradley,et al.  Polymer microarrays for cellular adhesion. , 2006, Chemical communications.

[6]  M. Bradley,et al.  Fabrication of arrays of polymer gradients using inkjet printing. , 2012, Macromolecular rapid communications.

[7]  Molly M. Stevens,et al.  Anisotropic fibrous scaffolds for articular cartilage regeneration. , 2012, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[8]  Yinzhi Lai,et al.  Three-dimensional polymer scaffolds for high throughput cell-based assay systems. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[9]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[10]  D. Deligianni,et al.  Stress relaxation behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Jun Wang,et al.  High throughput scaffold-based 3D micro-tumor array for efficient drug screening and chemosensitivity testing. , 2019, Biomaterials.

[12]  C. Simmons,et al.  A microfabricated platform with hydrogel arrays for 3D mechanical stimulation of cells. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[13]  R. Reis,et al.  A soft 3D polyacrylate hydrogel recapitulates the cartilage niche and allows growth-factor free tissue engineering of human articular cartilage. , 2019, Acta biomaterialia.

[14]  G. Mestres,et al.  Role of pore size and morphology in musculo-skeletal tissue regeneration. , 2016, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[15]  Yu Suk Choi,et al.  Interplay of Matrix Stiffness and Protein Tethering in Stem Cell Differentiation , 2014, Nature materials.

[16]  L. Griffith,et al.  Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[17]  P. Real,et al.  Poly(ethylmethacrylate-co-diethylaminoethyl acrylate) coating improves endothelial re-population, bio-mechanical and anti-thrombogenic properties of decellularized carotid arteries for blood vessel replacement , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[18]  E. Bonnin,et al.  Ice-templating beet-root pectin foams: Controlling texture, mechanics and capillary properties , 2018, Chemical Engineering Journal.

[19]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[20]  M. Bradley,et al.  Discovery and Evaluation of a Functional Ternary Polymer Blend for Bone Repair: Translation from a Microarray to a Clinical Model , 2013 .

[21]  Carl G. Simon,et al.  Combinatorial Polymer Scaffold Libraries for Screening Cell‐Biomaterial Interactions in 3D , 2008 .

[22]  Akhilesh K. Gaharwar,et al.  3D Biomaterial Microarrays for Regenerative Medicine: Current State‐of‐the‐Art, Emerging Directions and Future Trends , 2016, Advanced materials.

[23]  Mark Bradley,et al.  Versatile biocompatible polymer hydrogels: scaffolds for cell growth. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[24]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Microfabricated Biomaterials for Engineering 3D Tissues , 2012, Advanced materials.

[25]  P. Gopalan,et al.  Hydrogel arrays formed via differential wettability patterning enable combinatorial screening of stem cell behavior. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[26]  J. Hanak The “multiple-sample concept” in materials research: Synthesis, compositional analysis and testing of entire multicomponent systems , 1970 .

[27]  Melinda K. Kutzing,et al.  Cell Growth in Response to Mechanical Stiffness is Affected by Neuron- Astroglia Interactions , 2007 .

[28]  J. Mano,et al.  Bone physiology as inspiration for tissue regenerative therapies. , 2018, Biomaterials.

[29]  A. Ranga,et al.  3D niche microarrays for systems-level analyses of cell fate , 2014, Nature Communications.

[30]  M. Knight,et al.  Experimental validation of a flat punch indentation methodology calibrated against unconfined compression tests for determination of soft tissue biomechanics. , 2016, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[31]  David J. Beebe,et al.  Understanding the Impact of 2D and 3D Fibroblast Cultures on In Vitro Breast Cancer Models , 2013, PloS one.

[32]  H Follet,et al.  The degree of mineralization is a determinant of bone strength: a study on human calcanei. , 2004, Bone.

[33]  G. Genin,et al.  Cryoprotectant enables structural control of porous scaffolds for exploration of cellular mechano-responsiveness in 3D , 2019, Nature Communications.

[34]  Assaf Shapira,et al.  Personalized Hydrogels for Engineering Diverse Fully Autologous Tissue Implants , 2018, Advanced materials.

[35]  A. Evdokiou,et al.  SaOS2 Osteosarcoma Cells as an In Vitro Model for Studying the Transition of Human Osteoblasts to Osteocytes , 2014, Calcified Tissue International.

[36]  Fergal J O'Brien,et al.  The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[37]  G. Thouas,et al.  Bone tissue engineering scaffolding: computer-aided scaffolding techniques , 2014, Progress in Biomaterials.

[38]  Anthony Atala,et al.  Engineering Complex Tissues , 2012, Science Translational Medicine.

[39]  Song Li,et al.  Biomimetic gradient scaffold from ice-templating for self-seeding of cells with capillary effect. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[40]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Wenle Li,et al.  Freeze casting of porous materials: review of critical factors in microstructure evolution , 2012 .

[42]  I. Sanchez,et al.  Cryogenic Process to Elaborate Poly(ethylene glycol) Scaffolds. Experimental and Simulation Studies , 2013 .

[43]  F. N. van de Vosse,et al.  Experimental investigation of collagen waviness and orientation in the arterial adventitia using confocal laser scanning microscopy , 2011, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[44]  Weimin Li,et al.  A versatile 3D tissue matrix scaffold system for tumor modeling and drug screening , 2017, Science Advances.

[45]  Liping Liu THEORY OF ELASTICITY , 2012 .

[46]  M. Stevens,et al.  Combinatorial scaffold morphologies for zonal articular cartilage engineering , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[47]  A Sarvazyan,et al.  Soft tissue elastometer. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[48]  G. Wesolowski,et al.  Characterization of a human osteosarcoma cell line (Saos-2) with osteoblastic properties. , 1987, Cancer research.

[49]  D. Elbert,et al.  Liquid-liquid two-phase systems for the production of porous hydrogels and hydrogel microspheres for biomedical applications: A tutorial review. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[50]  Hsi-Chin Wu,et al.  Control of three-dimensional substrate stiffness to manipulate mesenchymal stem cell fate toward neuronal or glial lineages. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[51]  M. Bradley,et al.  High‐Density Polymer Microarrays: Identifying Synthetic Polymers that Control Human Embryonic Stem Cell Growth , 2014, Advanced healthcare materials.

[52]  Xiaowei Yang,et al.  Structural mechanics of 3D-printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds with tetragonal, hexagonal and wheel-like designs , 2019, Biofabrication.

[53]  Arrays of 3D double-network hydrogels for the high-throughput discovery of materials with enhanced physical and biological properties. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[54]  Mark Bradley,et al.  Strategies for cell manipulation and skeletal tissue engineering using high-throughput polymer blend formulation and microarray techniques. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[55]  M. Bradley,et al.  Acrylate-based materials for heart valve scaffold engineering. , 2017, Biomaterials science.

[56]  Sandra J Shefelbine,et al.  BoneJ: Free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ. , 2010, Bone.

[57]  Li-Hsin Han,et al.  Modeling Physiological Events in 2D vs. 3D Cell Culture. , 2017, Physiology.

[58]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.