Of toothy grins and angry snarls--open mouth displays contribute to efficiency gains in search for emotional faces.

The emotional face-in-a-crowd effect is widely cited, but its origin remains controversial, particularly with photorealistic stimuli. Recently, it has been suggested that one factor underlying the guidance of attention by a photorealistic emotional face in visual search might be the visibility of teeth, a hypothesis, however, that has not been studied systematically to date. The present experiments manipulate the visibility of teeth experimentally and orthogonally to facial emotion. Results suggest that much of the face-in-a-crowd effect with photorealistic emotional faces is due to visible teeth, and that the visibility of teeth can create a search advantage for either a happy or an angry target face when teeth visibility and facial emotion are confounded. Further analyses clarify that the teeth visibility primarily affects the speed with which neutral crowds are scanned, shedding new light on the mechanism that evokes differences in search efficiency for different emotional expressions.

[1]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  A reversal of the search asymmetry favouring negative schematic faces , 2010 .

[2]  R. Gur,et al.  The face in the crowd effect: anger superiority when using real faces and multiple identities. , 2010, Emotion.

[3]  J. Tanaka,et al.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants , 2009, Psychiatry Research.

[4]  O. Lipp,et al.  Emotional faces in neutral crowds: Detecting displays of anger, happiness, and sadness on schematic and photographic images of faces , 2009 .

[5]  O. Lipp,et al.  No effect of inversion on attentional and affective processing of facial expressions. , 2009, Emotion.

[6]  Ulrich Ansorge,et al.  Visual search for facial expressions of emotions: a comparison of dynamic and static faces. , 2009, Emotion.

[7]  Gernot Horstmann,et al.  Visual search for schematic affective faces: Stability and variability of search slopes with different instances , 2009 .

[8]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Attentional effects of negative faces: Top-down contingent or involuntary? , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  G. Zelinsky A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. , 2008, Psychological review.

[10]  Daniel Smilek,et al.  Visual search for faces with emotional expressions. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  L. Nummenmaa,et al.  Detection of emotional faces: salient physical features guide effective visual search. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Ulrich Ansorge,et al.  More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  L. Damjanovic,et al.  The eyes are sufficient to produce a threat superiority effect. , 2006, Emotion.

[14]  G. Horstmann,et al.  Search asymmetries with real faces: testing the anger-superiority effect. , 2006, Emotion.

[15]  G. Horstmann,et al.  Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual as well as emotional differences. , 2006, Emotion.

[16]  Daniel Lundqvist,et al.  Looking for foes and friends: perceptual and emotional factors when finding a face in the crowd. , 2005, Emotion.

[17]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Look at me, I'm smiling: Visual search for threatening and nonthreatening facial expressions , 2005 .

[18]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Negative facial expression captures attention and disrupts performance , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  E. Fox,et al.  Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces , 2002, Cognition & emotion.

[20]  D E Williams,et al.  Preattentive guidance of eye movements during triple conjunction search tasks: The effects of feature discriminability and saccadic amplitude , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  A. Ohman,et al.  The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .

[24]  D. Purcell,et al.  It Takes a Confounded Face to Pop Out of a Crowd , 1996, Perception.

[25]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[26]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  E. Farmer,et al.  Visual search through color displays: Effects of target-background similarity and background uniformity , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  S. Mineka,et al.  Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. , 2001, Psychological review.

[29]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[31]  P. Ekman Pictures of Facial Affect , 1976 .