Universal screening for domestic violence in a department of obstetrics and gynaecology: a patient and carer perspective

BEN NATAN M., BEN ARI G., BADER T. & HALLAK M. (2011) Universal screening for domestic violence in a department of obstetrics and gynaecology: a patient and carer perspective. International Nursing Review59, 108–114 Aim:  This study aimed to examine the effect of knowledge, department routine, and attitudes of physicians and nurses on the identification of female victims of domestic violence in Israel, as well as the patients' attitudes regarding the screening process. Background:  Every seventh woman in Israel is reported to have been victimized by her intimate partner at least once in her lifetime. Routine screening for intimate partner violence is endorsed by the Ministry of Health in Israel; however screening rates in healthcare settings remain low. Methods:  Correlative, cross-sectional design was utilized based on a sample of 100 physicians and nurses from an obstetrics and gynaecology department in a central Israel hospital and a stratified simple random sampling to recruit 100 former female patients. Findings:  Both medical and nursing staffs were reluctant to screen women for domestic violence, although the patients interviewed for the study claimed that screening is crucial for preventing domestic violence. Past experience with assessing violence and intention to screen were the most significant predictors of screening behaviour. Several factors impede screening by medical and nursing staff, although it is legally mandated. Discussion:  Nurses' and physicians' screening of women about domestic violence is a fundamental intervention with implications for health care in general and basic human rights in particular; however attitudes and beliefs must also be considered. Conclusions:  Screening women about domestic violence is an intervention not usually implemented by physicians and nurses. Understanding barriers to screening may help form feasible policies for improving the quality of services offered to women.

[1]  L. Modiba,et al.  Pilot survey of domestic abuse amongst pregnant women attending an antenatal clinic in a public hospital in Gauteng Province in South Africa. , 2011, Midwifery.

[2]  R. Robinson Myths and stereotypes: how registered nurses screen for intimate partner violence. , 2010, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[3]  D. Gillies,et al.  Screening and Intervention for Domestic Violence During Pregnancy Care: A Systematic Review , 2010, Trauma, violence & abuse.

[4]  M. B. Natan,et al.  Knowledge and Attitudes of Nurses Regarding Domestic Violence and Their Effect on the Identification of Battered Women , 2010, Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses.

[5]  Niwako Yamawaki,et al.  The Functions of Gender Role Traditionality, Ambivalent Sexism, Injury, and Frequency of Assault on Domestic Violence Perception , 2009, Violence against women.

[6]  Hadass Goldblatt Caring for abused women: impact on nurses' professional and personal life experiences. , 2009, Journal of advanced nursing.

[7]  R. Pratt,et al.  Domestic violence against women: Understanding social processes and women's experiences , 2009 .

[8]  Nora Montalvo-Liendo Cross-cultural factors in disclosure of intimate partner violence: an integrated review. , 2009, Journal of advanced nursing.

[9]  J. Silverman,et al.  Screening for domestic violence in an oncology clinic: barriers and potential solutions. , 2008, Oncology nursing forum.

[10]  Kirk R. Smith,et al.  Barriers to the Mandatory Reporting of Domestic Violence Encountered by Nursing Professionals , 2008, Journal of Trauma Nursing.

[11]  K. Spilsbury,et al.  Systematic review of the perceptions and experiences of accessing health services by adult victims of domestic violence. , 2007, Health & social care in the community.

[12]  C. Wathen,et al.  Factors influencing identification of and response to intimate partner violence: a survey of physicians and nurses , 2007, BMC Public Health.

[13]  M. Ramsay,et al.  Can current national surveillance systems in England and Wales monitor sexual transmission of hepatitis C among HIV-infected men who have sex with men? , 2007, BMC public health.

[14]  C. Brensinger,et al.  Identifying Pregnant Women Experiencing Domestic Violence in an Urban Emergency Department , 2007, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[15]  M. Yoder,et al.  Barriers to screening for domestic violence in the emergency department. , 2007, Journal of continuing education in nursing.

[16]  C. Watts,et al.  Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence , 2006, The Lancet.

[17]  M. Glezerman,et al.  [Domestic violence against women and the role of the obstetrician/gynecologist]. , 2006, Harefuah.

[18]  P. Wollan,et al.  Mothers' comfort with screening questions about sensitive issues, including domestic violence. , 2006, Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM.

[19]  G. Furman,et al.  Medical student identification of domestic violence as measured on an objective, standardized clinical examination. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  N. Christofides,et al.  How nurses' experiences of domestic violence influence service provision: study conducted in North-west province, South Africa. , 2005, Nursing & health sciences.

[21]  D. Coonrod,et al.  Screening for Domestic Violence: Practice Patterns, Knowledge, and Attitudes of Physicians in Arizona , 2004, Southern medical journal.

[22]  H. Nelson,et al.  Screening Women and Elderly Adults for Family and Intimate Partner Violence: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  B. Herbert,et al.  Domestic violence against women. , 1995, JAMA.

[24]  T. Stovall,et al.  Methods of and attitudes toward screening obstetrics and gynecology patients for domestic violence. , 1995, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.