EEG Integrated Platform Lossless (EEG-IP-L) pre-processing pipeline for objective signal quality assessment incorporating data annotation and blind source separation

BACKGROUND The methods available for pre-processing EEG data are rapidly evolving as researchers gain access to vast computational resources; however, the field currently lacks a set of standardized approaches for data characterization, efficient interactive quality control review procedures, and large-scale automated processing that is compatible with High Performance Computing (HPC) resources. NEW METHOD In this paper we describe an infrastructure for the development of standardized procedures for semi and fully automated pre-processing of EEG data. Our pipeline incorporates several methods to isolate cortical signal from noise, maintain maximal information from raw recordings and provide comprehensive quality control and data visualization. In addition, batch processing procedures are integrated to scale up analyses for processing hundreds or thousands of data sets using HPC clusters. RESULTS We demonstrate here that by using the EEG Integrated Platform Lossless (EEG-IP-L) pipeline's signal quality annotations, significant increase in data retention is achieved when applying subsequent post-processing ERP segment rejection procedures. Further, we demonstrate that the increase in data retention does not attenuate the ERP signal. CONCLUSIONS The EEG-IP-L state provides the infrastructure for an integrated platform that includes long-term data storage, minimal data manipulation and maximal signal retention, and flexibility in post processing strategies.

[1]  Tom Eichele,et al.  Semi-automatic identification of independent components representing EEG artifact , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  W. David Hairston,et al.  DETECT: A MATLAB Toolbox for Event Detection and Identification in Time Series, with Applications to Artifact Detection in EEG Signals , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  G. Gomez Automatic Artifact Removal ( AAR ) toolbox v 1 . 3 ( Release 09 . 12 . 2007 ) for MATLAB , 2007 .

[4]  Sidney J. Segalowitz,et al.  Cognitive control in the eye of the beholder: Electrocortical theta and alpha modulation during response preparation in a cued saccade task , 2017, NeuroImage.

[5]  Tony Charman,et al.  Neural Correlates of Eye Gaze Processing in the Infant Broader Autism Phenotype , 2009, Biological Psychiatry.

[6]  Kay A. Robbins,et al.  Hierarchical Event Descriptors (HED): Semi-Structured Tagging for Real-World Events in Large-Scale EEG , 2016, Front. Neuroinform..

[7]  Kaspar Anton Schindler,et al.  PureEEG: Automatic EEG artifact removal for epilepsy monitoring , 2014, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  Mark C. W. van Rossum,et al.  Systematic biases in early ERP and ERF components as a result of high-pass filtering , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  Anthony John Judge Functional Classification. I. , 1984 .

[10]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography , 2019, Scientific Data.

[11]  N. Fox,et al.  The Maryland analysis of developmental EEG (MADE) pipeline. , 2020, Psychophysiology.

[12]  T. Willoughby,et al.  Sensitivity to negative feedback among children and adolescents: An ERP study comparing developmental differences between high-worriers and low-worriers , 2020, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  S. Segalowitz,et al.  A functional classification of medial frontal negativity ERPs: Theta oscillations and single subject effects. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[14]  A. Mognon,et al.  ADJUST: An automatic EEG artifact detector based on the joint use of spatial and temporal features. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[15]  Dorothy V. M. Bishop,et al.  Journal of Neuroscience Methods , 2015 .

[16]  Tim Mullen,et al.  How Sensitive Are EEG Results to Preprocessing Methods: A Benchmarking Study , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Kay A. Robbins,et al.  Automated EEG mega-analysis I: Spectral and amplitude characteristics across studies , 2018, NeuroImage.

[18]  R. B. Reilly,et al.  FASTER: Fully Automated Statistical Thresholding for EEG artifact Rejection , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  Scott Makeig,et al.  The ICLabel dataset of electroencephalographic (EEG) independent component (IC) features , 2019, Data in brief.

[20]  R. Ross A Practical Guide to the Selection and Use of Splrometers , 1988 .

[21]  Sidney J. Segalowitz,et al.  STATSLAB: An open-source EEG toolbox for computing single-subject effects using robust statistics , 2018, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  Gert Cauwenberghs,et al.  Real-time EEG Source-mapping Toolbox (REST): Online ICA and source localization , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[23]  Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado,et al.  ICLabel: An automated electroencephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and website , 2019, NeuroImage.

[24]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  EEG-IP: an international infant EEG data integration platform for the study of risk and resilience in autism and related conditions , 2018, Molecular medicine.

[25]  Amir Rastegarnia,et al.  Methods for artifact detection and removal from scalp EEG: A review , 2016, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  Sidney J. Segalowitz,et al.  Watch out! Medial frontal cortex is activated by cues signaling potential changes in response demands , 2015, NeuroImage.

[27]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[28]  Nima Bigdely Shamlo,et al.  Automated EEG mega-analysis I: Spectral and amplitude characteristics across studies , 2020, NeuroImage.

[29]  Valdas Noreika,et al.  14 challenges and their solutions for conducting social neuroscience and longitudinal EEG research with infants. , 2019, Infant behavior & development.

[30]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Testing the ICA mixing matrix based on inter-subject or inter-session consistency , 2011, NeuroImage.

[31]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments , 2016, Scientific Data.

[32]  Nima Bigdely Shamlo,et al.  Automated EEG mega-analysis II: Cognitive aspects of event related features , 2020, NeuroImage.

[33]  Jia Wu,et al.  Social exclusion modulates event-related frontal theta and tracks ostracism distress in children , 2015, NeuroImage.

[34]  Tim Mullen,et al.  Automated EEG mega-analysis II: Cognitive aspects of event related features , 2018, NeuroImage.

[35]  Kyungmin Su,et al.  The PREP pipeline: standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis , 2015, Front. Neuroinform..

[36]  James A Desjardins,et al.  Deconstructing the early visual electrocortical responses to face and house stimuli. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[37]  April R. Levin,et al.  The Harvard Automated Processing Pipeline for Electroencephalography (HAPPE): Standardized Processing Software for Developmental and High-Artifact Data , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[38]  Marco Congedo,et al.  Online denoising of eye-blinks in electroencephalography , 2017, Neurophysiologie Clinique.

[39]  M. Tangermann,et al.  Automatic Classification of Artifactual ICA-Components for Artifact Removal in EEG Signals , 2011, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[40]  Slawomir J. Nasuto,et al.  Automatic Artefact Removal from Event-related Potentials via Clustering , 2007, J. VLSI Signal Process..

[41]  Reinhold Scherer,et al.  FORCe: Fully Online and Automated Artifact Removal for Brain-Computer Interfacing , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.