The Impact of Distraction Mitigation Strategies on Driving Performance

Objectives: An experiment was conducted to assess the effects of distraction mitigation strategies on drivers? performance and productivity while engaged in an in-vehicle information system task. Background: Previous studies show that in-vehicle tasks undermine driver safety and there is a need to mitigate driver distraction. Method: An advising strategy that alerts drivers to potential dangers and a locking strategy that prevents the driver from continuing the distracting task were presented to 16 middle-aged and 12 older drivers in a driving simulator in two modes (auditory, visual) and two road conditions (curves, braking events). Results: Distraction was a problem for both age groups. Visual distractions were more detrimental than auditory ones for curve negotiation, as depicted by more erratic steering, F(6, 155) = 26.76, p < .05. Drivers did brake more abruptly under auditory distractions, but this effect was mitigated by both the advising, t(155) = 8.37, p < .05, and locking strategies, t(155) = 8.49, p < .05. The locking strategy also resulted in longer minimum time to collision for middle-aged drivers engaged in visual distractions, F(6, 138) = 2.43, p < .05. Conclusions: Adaptive interfaces can reduce abrupt braking on curve entries resulting from auditory distractions and can also improve the braking response for distracted drivers. Application: These strategies can be incorporated into existing in-vehicle systems, thus mitigating the effects of distraction and improving driver performance.

[1]  Robert L Sumwalt,et al.  Cockpit Interruptions and Distractions: Effective Management Requires a Careful Balancing Act , 1999 .

[2]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Impact of traveler advisory systems on driving speed: some new evidence , 2004 .

[3]  Andrew M. Parkes,et al.  Driving Future Vehicles , 1993 .

[4]  C D Wickens,et al.  Compatibility and Resource Competition between Modalities of Input, Central Processing, and Output , 1983, Human factors.

[5]  A Stevens,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN FACTORS GUIDELINES FOR IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[6]  Valdimar Briem,et al.  The effect of concurrent task difficulty on working memory during simulated driving , 1999 .

[7]  D. E. Johnson,et al.  Analysis of Messy Data Volume I: Designed Experiments , 1985 .

[8]  Drake R. Bradley,et al.  Some cautions regarding statistical power in split-plot designs , 1998 .

[9]  P J Cooper,et al.  Differences in accident characteristics among elderly drivers and between elderly and middle-aged drivers. , 1990, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Dallas E. Johnson,et al.  Analysis of messy data , 1992 .

[11]  A Latorella Kara,et al.  Effects of Modality on Interrupted Flight Deck Performance: Implications for Data Link , 1998 .

[12]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Driver Distraction From a Control Theory Perspective , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Michael J. Goodman,et al.  NHTSA DRIVER DISTRACTION RESEARCH: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE , 2001 .

[14]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[15]  M M Minderhoud,et al.  Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Daniel C. McFarlane,et al.  Comparison of Four Primary Methods for Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Dario D. Salvucci.  Modeling Driver Distraction from Cognitive Tasks , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[18]  Peter J Cooper,et al.  Turning gap acceptance decision-making: the impact of driver distraction. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[19]  C G Brown,et al.  DRIVING FUTURE VEHICLES. CHAPTER 30: A HUMAN VIEW OF DIALOGUE AND DIALOGUE MANAGEMENT IN THE AUTOMOBILE , 1993 .

[20]  Timothy L. Brown,et al.  Speech-Based Interaction with In-Vehicle Computers: The Effect of Speech-Based E-Mail on Drivers' Attention to the Roadway , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[21]  C. Wickens,et al.  Workload transition: Implications for individual and team performance. , 1993 .

[22]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Components of fluent reading , 1985 .

[23]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[24]  John D. Lee,et al.  Preface to the Special Section on Driver Distraction , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[25]  Clyde Young Kramer,et al.  Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications , 1956 .

[26]  W W Wierwille,et al.  AUTOMOTIVE ERGONOMICS. CHAPTER 14. VISUAL AND MANUAL DEMANDS OF IN- CAR CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS , 1993 .

[27]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Collision Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[28]  Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones,et al.  Evaluating two aspects of direct manipulation in advanced cockpits , 1992, CHI.

[29]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Humans and Automation: System Design and Research Issues , 2002 .

[30]  Susan A Ferguson,et al.  Other high-risk factors for young drivers - how graduated licensing does, doesn't or could address them. , 2013, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[31]  John Vavrik,et al.  The impact of hands-free message reception/response on driving task performance. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  M. A. Recarte,et al.  COGNITIVE DEMANDS OF HANDS-FREE-PHONE CONVERSATION WHILE DRIVING , 2002 .

[33]  Christopher A. Monk,et al.  The Attentional Costs of Interrupting Task Performance at Various Stages , 2002 .

[34]  William B. Rouse,et al.  Studies of dynamic task allocation in an aerial search environment , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[35]  H Summala,et al.  Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[36]  Katja Vogel,et al.  A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  Linda Angell,et al.  The Dimensions of Driver Performance during Secondary Manual Tasks , 2005 .

[38]  W B Verwey.  Evaluating safety effects of in-vehicle information systems , 1996 .

[39]  W B Verwey.  How can we prevent overload of the driver , 1993 .

[40]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Taxonomy of Mitigation Strategies for Driver Distraction , 2003 .

[41]  G McGwin,et al.  Characteristics of traffic crashes among young, middle-aged, and older drivers. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[42]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[43]  P A Hancock,et al.  Alarm effectiveness in driver-centred collision-warning systems. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[44]  A. Hamish Jamson,et al.  Speech-Based E-Mail and Driver Behavior: Effects of an In-Vehicle Message System Interface , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[45]  Frank Drews,et al.  Profiles in Driver Distraction: Effects of Cell Phone Conversations on Younger and Older Drivers , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[46]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance , 2004 .

[47]  Erwin R. Boer,et al.  Development of a steering entropy method for evaluating driver workload , 1999 .

[48]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Factors influencing the use of cellular (mobile) phone during driving and hazards while using it. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[49]  R. Leiser.  Driver-vehicle interface: dialogue design for voice input , 1993 .