Political and Public Acceptability of Congestion Pricing: Ideology and Self Interest

Studies of the “stated preferences” of households generally report public and political opposition by urban commuters to congestion pricing. It is thought that this opposition inhibits or precludes tolls and pricing systems that would enhance efficiency in the use of scarce roadways. This paper analyzes the only case in which road pricing was decided by a citizen referendum on the basis of experience with a specific pricing system. The city of Stockholm introduced a toll system for seven months in 2006, after which citizens voted on its permanent adoption. We match precinct voting records to citizen commute times and costs by traffic zone, and we analyze patterns of voting in response to economic and political incentives. We document political and ideological incentives for citizen choice, but we also find that the pattern of time savings and incremental costs exerts a powerful influence on voting behavior. In this instance, at least, citizen voters behave as if they value commute time highly. When they have experienced first-hand the out-of-pocket costs and time-savings of a specific pricing scheme, they are prepared to adopt freely policies which reduce congestion on urban motorways.

[1]  Mogens Fosgerau,et al.  Workers' marginal costs of commuting , 2008 .

[2]  J. Elíasson.  Lessons from the Stockholm congestion charging trial , 2008 .

[3]  B. McCarl,et al.  Economics , 1870, The Indian medical gazette.

[4]  Orlando Strambi,et al.  URBAN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS , 1994 .

[5]  H. F. Williamson,et al.  Value of Time, Choice of Mode, and the Subsidy Issue in Urban Transportation , 1963, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  Terje Tretvik,et al.  Urban Road Pricing in Norway: Public Acceptability and Travel Behaviour , 2003 .

[7]  J. Schade,et al.  Acceptability of Urban Transport Pricing , 2000 .

[8]  J. Saunders.  The rise and fall of Edinburgh's congestion charging plans , 2005 .

[9]  J. P. Bocarejo,et al.  The London congestion charge: a tentative economic appraisal , 2005 .

[10]  J. Schade,et al.  Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies , 2003 .

[11]  B S Frey,et al.  Why Are Efficient Transport Policy Instruments so Seldom Used , 2003 .

[12]  J. Elíasson,et al.  The Stockholm congestion – charging trial 2006: Overview of effects ☆ , 2009 .

[13]  M. Beesley.  The Value of Time Spent in Travelling: Some New Evidence , 1965 .

[14]  J. Franklin.  A Non-Parametric Analysis of Welfare Redistribution : The Case of Stockholm ’ s Congestion Pricing Trial , 2005 .

[15]  T. Litman.  London Congestion Pricing – Implications for Other Cities , 2005 .

[16]  José A. Gómez-Ibáñez,et al.  THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF HIGHWAY TOLLS AND CONGESTION , 1992 .

[17]  K. Brundell-Freij,et al.  The development of public attitudes towards the Stockholm congestion trial , 2009 .

[18]  Jay R Cherlow.  Measuring Values of Travel Time Savings , 1981 .

[19]  Tom Rye,et al.  Public Acceptability of Road User Charging: The Case of Edinburgh and the 2005 Referendum , 2007 .

[20]  Wood Powell Anderson,et al.  Weed Science: Principles and Applications , 1995 .

[21]  Peter Jones,et al.  Acceptability of Road User Charging: Meeting the Challenge , 2003 .

[22]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  How Do Senators Vote? Disentangling the Role of Voter Preferences, Party Affiliation, and Senate Ideology , 1996 .

[23]  Jonathan Leape.  The London Congestion Charge , 2006 .

[24]  C. Sharp,et al.  Congestion and Welfare-An Examination of the Case for a Congestion Tax , 1966 .

[25]  A. Mas-Colell,et al.  Microeconomic Theory , 1995 .

[26]  Robert E. Hall,et al.  Economics: Principles and Applications , 1997 .

[27]  K. Small,et al.  The Economics Of Traffic Congestion , 1993 .

[28]  Mark Goh,et al.  Congestion management and electronic road pricing in Singapore , 2002 .

[29]  W. Harrington,et al.  OVERCOMING PUBLIC AVERSION TO CONGESTION PRICING , 2001 .

[30]  W. Vickrey.  PRICING IN URBAN AND SUBURBAN TRANSPORT , 1994 .

[31]  J. Elíasson.  A cost–benefit analysis of the Stockholm congestion charging system , 2009 .

[32]  A. Deserpa.  A Theory of the Economics of Time , 1971 .

[33]  J. Elíasson,et al.  Equity effects of congestion pricing: Quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm , 2006 .

[34]  C. Willoughby,et al.  Singapore's motorization policies 1960-2000 , 2001 .

[35]  John Forrest Kain.  How to improve urban transportation at practically no cost , 1970 .

[36]  A. Deserpa.  On the Comparative Statics of Time Allocation Theory , 1975 .

[37]  Sock-Yong Phang,et al.  ROAD CONGESTION PRICING IN SINGAPORE: 1975 TO 2003 , 2004 .

[38]  N. Mankiw,et al.  Principles of Economics , 1871 .