Synthetic biology: navigating the challenges ahead.

The emerging field of synthetic biology is broadly defined as the area of intersection of biology and engineering that focuses on the modification or creation of novel biological systems that do not have a counterpart in nature. Potential applications of this technology range from creating systems for environmental cleanup tasks, for medical diagnosis and treatment, to economical generation of hydrogen fuel. This technology is in tis nascent state and there are a number of concerns surrounding its potential applications and the nature of research being performed. With the potential to create hitherto unknown "living organisms", it raises a number of challenges along different dimensions. This article reviews the current state of the technology and analyzes synthetic biology using different lenses: patentability, ethics, and regulation. It proposes a classification system for the products of synthetic biology and provides recommendations in each of the above areas (patentability, ethics, and regulation) in the context of this classification system. These recommendations include an improved framework for patentability testing, ethical principles to guide work in this area, a controlled approval process, and reference frameworks for regulation.

[1]  E M Judd,et al.  Toggles and oscillators: new genetic circuit designs. , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[2]  M. Elowitz,et al.  A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators , 2000, Nature.

[3]  H. McAdams,et al.  Gene regulation: Towards a circuit engineering discipline , 2000, Current Biology.

[4]  C. Southgate Introduction to Environmental Ethics , 2002 .

[5]  J. Rinehart U . S . Patent , 2006 .

[6]  K. Strandburg What Does the Public Get? Experimental Use and the Patent Bargain , 2003 .

[7]  J Craig Venter,et al.  Generating a synthetic genome by whole genome assembly: φX174 bacteriophage from synthetic oligonucleotides , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  A. Paul,et al.  Chemical Synthesis of Poliovirus cDNA: Generation of Infectious Virus in the Absence of Natural Template , 2002, Science.

[9]  Arthur L. Caplan,et al.  Policy forum: genetics. Ethical considerations in synthesizing a minimal genome. , 1999, Science.

[10]  W. Russell,et al.  Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding Animal Testing and Research , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  H H McAdams,et al.  Towards a circuit engineering discipline. , 2000, Current biology : CB.

[12]  Dan Ferber,et al.  Microbes Made to Order , 2004, Science.

[13]  Ron Weiss,et al.  Teaching bacteria a new language. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Philip Ball,et al.  Life's lessons in design , 2001, Nature.

[15]  R. M. Iwasaka From Chakrabarty to chimeras: the growing need for evolutionary biology in patent law. , 2000, The Yale law journal.

[16]  T. A. Magnani The patentability of human-animal chimeras. , 1999, Berkeley technology law journal.

[17]  J. Collins,et al.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.

[18]  Chris Hanson,et al.  Amorphous computing , 2000, Commun. ACM.

[19]  O. White,et al.  Global transposon mutagenesis and a minimal Mycoplasma genome. , 1999, Science.