Immediate and long-term results of the treatment of patients with rectal cancer

The purpose of the study was to analyze rectal resection outcomes in patients with rectal cancer.Material and Methods. A retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes of 251 patients with stage cT3–4aN0–2M0 rectal cancer, who underwent transperitoneal resections of the rectum with mesorectumectomy from 2015 to 2020, was carried out. The age of the patients ranged from 27 to 90 years. Considering the extent of rectal tumor spread, 143 (56.9 %) patients underwent neoadjuvant prolonged conformal radiation therapy or chemoradiotherapy.Results. The failure of the colorectal anastomosis was observed in 11 (4.4 %) patients, repeated surgery was performed in 8 (72.7 %) patients (Grade C). During the follow-up, disease progression was detected in 58 (23.1 %) patients, tumor recurrence in the rectum occurred in 2 (0.8 %) patients, and distant metastases were found in 56 (22.3 %) patients. Statistical analysis showed that the parameters, such as the age, localization of the tumor in the rectum, tumor grade and T stage did not significantly affect the disease progression. A statistically significant relationship between the disease progression and pN2 stage was revealed. Patients with pN2 stage were 4.1 times more likely to have disease progression. The 75th percentile survival time was51.2 months. Patients with pN2 stage had a 3.6-fold increase in the risk of lethal outcome.Conclusion. The study demonstrated good oncological and surgical outcomes in the treatment of stage II–III rectal cancer with high survival rates. Resection of the rectum in patients with rectal cancer is a safe and predictable surgical procedure accompanied by a low incidence of anastomotic leaks and disease recurrence. The pN2 stage in rectal cancer patients significantly worsened the oncologic outcomes and survival of patients.

[1]  E. Kolesnikov,et al.  The results of anterior rectal resection with the formation of a hardware anastomosis in cancer patients , 2021, South Russian Journal of Cancer.

[2]  Hugh Elbourne,et al.  Risk factors for recurrence in colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis in a regional Australian hospital , 2021, ANZ journal of surgery.

[3]  H. van Goor,et al.  Trends in risk factors of anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery (2011–2019): A Dutch population‐based study , 2021, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[4]  Ю. А. Геворкян,et al.  Современные прогностические факторы при колоректальном раке , 2021 .

[5]  S. Ng,et al.  Anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer patients: New insights and perspectives. , 2020, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[6]  Min Seob Kim,et al.  MSI status is associated with distinct clinicopathological features in BRAF mutation colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, Pathology, research and practice.

[7]  P. Delrio,et al.  Promising Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers for Precision Prevention and Therapy , 2019, Cancers.

[8]  C. Ishioka,et al.  Consensus molecular subtypes classification of colorectal cancer as a predictive factor for chemotherapeutic efficacy against metastatic colorectal cancer , 2018, Oncotarget.

[9]  R. Perez,et al.  New Strategies in Rectal Cancer. , 2017, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[10]  D. Margolin,et al.  Management of Colorectal Anastomotic Leak , 2016, Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.

[11]  R. Steele,et al.  Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks , 2015, The British journal of surgery.

[12]  Y. Doki,et al.  The Severity of Anastomotic Leakage May Negatively Impact the Long-term Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer. , 2018, Anticancer research.