Vibrotactile adaptation fails to enhance spatial localization in adults with autism

A recent study [Tannan, V., Tommerdahl, M., Whitsel, B.L., 2006. Vibrotactile adaptation enhances spatial localization. Brain Res. 1102(1), 109-116 (Aug 2)] showed that pre-exposure of a skin region to a 5 s 25 Hz flutter stimulus ("adaptation") results in an approximately 2-fold improvement in the ability of neurologically healthy human adults to localize mechanical stimulation delivered to the same skin region that received the adapting stimulation. Tannan et al. [Tannan, V., Tommerdahl, M., Whitsel, B.L., 2006. Vibrotactile adaptation enhances spatial localization. Brain Res. 1102(1), 109-116 (Aug 2)] proposed that tactile spatial discriminative performance is improved following adaptation because adaptation is accompanied by an increase in the spatial contrast in the response of contralateral primary somatosensory cortex (SI) to mechanical skin stimulation--an effect identified in previous imaging studies of SI cortex in anesthetized non-human primates [e.g., Simons, S.B., Tannan, V., Chiu, J., Favorov, O.V., Whitsel, B.L., Tommerdahl, M, 2005. Amplitude-dependency of response of SI cortex to flutter stimulation. BMC Neurosci. 6(1), 43 (Jun 21) ; Tommerdahl, M., Favorov, O.V., Whitsel, B.L., 2002. Optical imaging of intrinsic signals in somatosensory cortex. Behav. Brain Res. 135, 83-91; Whitsel, B.L., Favorov, O.V., Tommerdahl, M., Diamond, M., Juliano, S., Kelly, D., 1989. Dynamic processes govern the somatosensory cortical response to natural stimulation. In: Lund, J.S., (Ed.), Sensory Processing in the Mammalian Brain. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 79-107]. In the experiments described in this report, a paradigm identical to that employed previously by Tannan et al. [Tannan, V., Tommerdahl, M., Whitsel, B.L., 2006. Vibrotactile adaptation enhances spatial localization. Brain Res. 1102(1), 109-116 (Aug 2)] was used to study adults with autism. The results demonstrate that although cutaneous localization performance of adults with autism is significantly better than the performance of control subjects when the period of adapting stimulation is short (i.e., 0.5 s), tactile spatial discriminative capacity remained unaltered in the same subjects when the duration of adapting stimulation was increased (to 5 s). Both the failure of prior history of tactile stimulation to alter tactile spatial localization in adults with autism, and the better-than-normal tactile localization performance of adults with autism when the period of adaptation is short are concluded to be attributable to the deficient cerebral cortical GABAergic inhibitory neurotransmission characteristic of this disorder.

[1]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Model of autism: increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems , 2003, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[2]  M. Rowe,et al.  Vibrotactile frequency discrimination in human hairy skin. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  B. Whitsel,et al.  Duration-dependent response of SI to vibrotactile stimulation in squirrel monkey. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Jean-Louis Adrien,et al.  Hypersensitivity to acoustic change in children with autism: electrophysiological evidence of left frontal cortex dysfunctioning. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[5]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Ruth A. Carper,et al.  Autism and Abnormal Development of Brain Connectivity , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Autism: a window onto the development of the social and the analytic brain. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  F. Polleux,et al.  Toward a developmental neurobiology of autism. , 2004, Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews.

[9]  G. Essick,et al.  Tactile Perception in Adults with Autism: a Multidimensional Psychophysical Study , 2008, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[10]  D. Cohen,et al.  Sensory receptor sensitivity in autistic children: response times to proximal and distal stimulation. , 1981, Archives of general psychiatry.

[11]  M Tommerdahl,et al.  Stimulus-dependent effects on tactile spatial acuity , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[12]  S. Schulz,et al.  Glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 and 67 kDa proteins are reduced in autistic parietal and cerebellar cortices , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[13]  Matthew K Belmonte,et al.  Functional anatomy of impaired selective attention and compensatory processing in autism. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Amplitude-dependency of response of SI cortex to flutter stimulation , 2005, BMC Neuroscience.

[15]  P. Haggard,et al.  Tactile sensitivity in Asperger syndrome , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[16]  V. Tannan,et al.  A novel device for delivering two-site vibrotactile stimuli to the skin , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  D. Buxhoeveden,et al.  Disruption in the Inhibitory Architecture of the Cell Minicolumn: Implications for Autisim , 2003, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[18]  L. Sikich,et al.  Early Pharmacological Treatment of Autism: A Rationale for Developmental Treatment , 2007, Biological Psychiatry.

[19]  L. Saksida,et al.  Towards an understanding of the mechanisms of weak central coherence effects: experiments in visual configural learning and auditory perception. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  J. Hussman,et al.  Letters to the Editor: Suppressed GABAergic Inhibition as a Common Factor in Suspected Etiologies of Autism , 2001, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[21]  A. Kohn,et al.  Functional neocortical microcircuitry demonstrated with intrinsic signal optical imaging in vitro , 1999, Neuroscience.

[22]  R H LaMotte,et al.  Disorders in somesthesis following lesions of parietal lobe. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  M. Herbert,et al.  Large Brains in Autism: The Challenge of Pervasive Abnormality , 2005, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[24]  B. Hubert,et al.  Enhanced Perceptual Functioning in Autism: An Update, and Eight Principles of Autistic Perception , 2006, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[25]  Barry L. Whitsel,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation enhances spatial localization , 2006, Brain Research.

[26]  Walter Magerl,et al.  Spatial discrimination thresholds for pain and touch in human hairy skin , 2001, Pain.

[27]  M. Just,et al.  Cortical activation and synchronization during sentence comprehension in high-functioning autism: evidence of underconnectivity. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  Geraldine Dawson,et al.  A replication of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) revised algorithms. , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[29]  B. Whitsel,et al.  Determinants of patchy metabolic labeling in the somatosensory cortex of cats: a possible role for intrinsic inhibitory circuitry , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  Mark Tommerdahl,et al.  Optical imaging of intrinsic signals in somatosensory cortex , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[31]  H. Engeland,et al.  Minicolumnar abnormalities in autism , 2006, Acta Neuropathologica.

[32]  Andrew E. Switala,et al.  Minicolumnar pathology in autism , 2002, Neurology.