Evaluation Study of New Jersey Turnpike Authority's Time of Day Pricing Initiative

In September 2000, the New Jersey (NJ) Turnpike Authority introduced E-ZPass technology along with the first stage of its time of day pricing program. In January 2003, toll levels for each time period and vehicle type were increased as part of the second stage of the NJ Turnpike time of day pricing program. The project had three main focus areas: Traffic Impacts, Behavioral Impacts and Media and Decision Makers Responses. In the first area, aggregate traffic counts and disaggregate vehicle-by-vehicle traffic and travel time information were used to quantify the impacts of the two phases of the time of day pricing program on the time of day choices of users. In addition, a simulation and toll plaza model were developed to assess the before and after toll plaza and facility-wide throughput, delays both at the toll plazas and mainline, and emissions. In the second focus area, traveler surveys were conducted with passenger cars to gain insights on the behavioral changes, and to evaluate the economic value of travel time savings and elasticities of NJ Turnpike users. Finally, in the third focus area the acceptability of the time of day pricing program among media and decision makers was investigated. The aggregate analysis revealed a shift in traffic to off-peak periods after the first phase of time of day pricing program, and a shift to peak periods after the second phase. The disaggregate analysis indicated that given the small toll differential between peak and off-peak periods, commuters responded more to congestion (lower travel times) than slightly higher tolls, and second phase of the time of day pricing program did not have a statistically significant impact on the traffic patterns of the NJ Turnpike. Simulation results revealed that from 2000 to 2001 the average trip delay was reduced by about 3-18%, E-ZPass was observed to reduce the toll plaza delays by 44-74%, and there was a 10.7% reduction in vehicles emission levels. However, after 2001 emissions slightly increased due to the increasing demand. In addition, the NJ Turnpike users had relatively high value of travel (VOT) values ($15/hr-$20/hr) and low elasticity values (between -0.06 and -0.18), indicating that they give higher values to travel time savings compared to other toll road users in the United States (U.S.).

[1]  K. Small,et al.  ROAD PRICING FOR CONGESTION MANAGEMENT: A SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE. SYNTHESIS OF HIGHWAY PRACTICE 210 , 1994 .

[2]  J. Bates Measuring Travel Time Values with a Discrete Choice Model: A Note , 1987 .

[3]  P. Ferrari Road network toll pricing and social welfare , 2002 .

[4]  Matthew Barth,et al.  Integrating a Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model into ATMIS Transportation Modeling Frameworks , 2001 .

[5]  Anthony D. May,et al.  Road pricing: An international perspective , 1992 .

[6]  Panos G Michalopoulos,et al.  Practical Procedure for Calibrating Microscopic Traffic Simulation Models , 2003 .

[7]  M. Burris,et al.  DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS OF TRAVELER PARTICIPATION IN DIFFERENTIAL TIME OF DAY PRICING PROGRAMS , 2002 .

[8]  Thierry Blayac,et al.  Value of travel time: a theoretical legitimization of some nonlinear representative utility in discrete choice models , 2001 .

[9]  Georgina Santos,et al.  Preliminary Results of the London Congestion Charging Scheme , 2004 .

[10]  W. Vickrey Congestion Theory and Transport Investment , 1969 .

[11]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Development and Calibration of a Large-Scale Microscopic Traffic Simulation Model , 2004 .

[12]  Joseph Berechman,et al.  ESTIMATION AND EVALUATION OF FULL MARGINAL COSTS OF HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION IN NEW JERSEY , 2001 .

[13]  Reza Mortazavi,et al.  ANOMALIES IN THE VALUE OF TRAVEL-TIME CHANGES , 2001 .

[14]  C. A. Guevara,et al.  BEHIND THE SUBJECTIVE VALUE OF TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS: THE PERCEPTION OF WORK, LEISURE AND TRAVEL. , 2001 .

[15]  A. Boardman,et al.  “Plug-in” shadow price estimates for policy analysis , 1997 .

[16]  Ali Mekky,et al.  Forecasting Toll Revenues for Fully Electronic Highways Operating Under Transponder and Video-Imaging Systems , 1999 .

[17]  Baher Abdulhai,et al.  Genetic algorithm-based combinatorial parametric optimization for the calibration of microscopic traffic simulation models , 2001, ITSC 2001. 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8585).

[18]  Rosa Marina González The value of time: a theoretical review , 1997 .

[19]  T. Oum,et al.  A survey of recent estimates of price elasticities of demand for transport , 1990 .

[20]  Hai Yang,et al.  The multi-class, multi-criteria traffic network equilibrium and systems optimum problem , 2004 .

[21]  Takayuki Morikawa,et al.  Variations of Value of Travel Time Savings , 2003 .

[22]  Margaret O'Mahony,et al.  External Costs Associated with Interregional Transport , 1999 .

[23]  A. Deserpa A Theory of the Economics of Time , 1971 .

[24]  Staffan Algers,et al.  Mixed Logit Estimation of the Value of Travel Time , 1998 .

[25]  C. Winston,et al.  The value of automobile travel time: implications for congestion policy , 1998 .

[26]  Peter Bonsall,et al.  MODEL PREDICTIONS OF THE EFFECTS OF MOTORWAY CHARGING IN WEST YORKSHIRE , 1995 .

[27]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  SECOND BEST CONGESTION PRICING: THE CASE OF AN UNTOLLED ALTERNATIVE. IN: URBAN TRANSPORT , 1996 .

[28]  E Sullivan EVALUATING THE IMPACTS OF THE SR 91 VARIABLE-TOLL EXPRESS LANE FACILITY. FINAL REPORT , 1998 .

[29]  WISCONSIN'S APPROACH TO VARIATION IN TRAFFIC DATA , 2000 .

[30]  Yunlong Zhang,et al.  Systematic Validation of a Microscopic Traffic Simulation Program , 2004 .

[31]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  THE ADMINISTRATIVE AND COMPLIANCE COST OF MANUAL HIGHWAY TOLL COLLECTION: EVIDENCE FROM MASSACHUSETTS AND NEW JERSEY , 1995, National Tax Journal.

[32]  Christiane Metzner,et al.  TollSim: Simulation and evaluation of toll stations , 2004 .

[33]  Janusz Supernak i I-15 CONGESTION PRICING PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION SERVICES TASK 13 PHASE II YEAR THREE OVERALL REPORT , 2001 .

[34]  M. Burris,et al.  Impact of Variable Pricing on Temporal Distribution of Travel Demand , 2001 .

[35]  Henry X. Liu,et al.  A calibration procedure for microscopic traffic simulation , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[36]  S. Jara-Díaz On the goods-activities technical relations in the time allocation theory , 2003 .

[37]  Lawrence E. Blume,et al.  Mathematics for Economists , 1994 .

[38]  T. Litman London Congestion Pricing – Implications for Other Cities , 2005 .

[39]  G. Harvey TRANSPORTATION PRICING AND TRAVEL BEHAVIOR , 1994 .

[40]  D. Levinson,et al.  The Full Cost of Intercity Highway Transportation , 1998 .

[41]  Walid Abdelwahab,et al.  Elasticities of mode choice probabilities and market elasticities of demand: Evidence from a simultaneous mode choice/shipment-size freight transport model , 1998 .

[42]  William Vickrey,et al.  Automobile Accidents, Tort Law, Externalities, and Insurance: An Economist’s Critique , 1968 .

[43]  Joseph Berechman,et al.  Bridge and tunnel toll elasticities in New York , 1995 .

[44]  S. Proost,et al.  Travel cost and time measurement in travel cost models , 2001 .

[45]  I. Parry,et al.  Revenue Recycling and the Welfare Effects of Road Pricing , 1999 .

[46]  R. H. Myers,et al.  STAT 319 : Probability & Statistics for Engineers & Scientists Term 152 ( 1 ) Final Exam Wednesday 11 / 05 / 2016 8 : 00 – 10 : 30 AM , 2016 .

[47]  Anthony D. May,et al.  Effects of alternative road pricing systems on network performance , 2000 .

[48]  Edward C. Sullivan,et al.  Choice Models of Route, Occupancy, and Time of Day with Value-Priced Tolls , 2002 .

[49]  E. Sullivan,et al.  CONTINUATION STUDY TO EVALUATE THE IMPACTS OF THE SR 91 VALUE-PRICED EXPRESS LANES. FINAL REPORT , 2000 .

[50]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  A new approach for travel demand modeling: Linking Roy's Identity to discrete choice , 2004 .

[51]  T. Arentze,et al.  PREDICTING MULTI-FACETED ACTIVITY-TRAVEL ADJUSTMENT STRATEGIES IN RESPONSE TO POSSIBLE CONGESTION PRICING SCENARIOS USING AN INTERNET- BASED STATED ADAPTATION EXPERIMENT , 2003 .

[52]  Haitham Al-Deek,et al.  SIMULATION AND EVALUATION OF THE ORLANDO-ORANGE COUNTY EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY (OOCEA) ELECTRONIC TOLL COLLECTION PLAZAS USING TPSIM (COPYRIGHT) , 2000 .

[53]  Kenneth Gillingham,et al.  Measuring marginal congestion costs of urban transportation: Do networks matter? , 2007 .

[54]  R. Jayakrishnan,et al.  Calibration and Path Dynamics Issues in Microscopic Simulation for Advanced Traffic Management and Information Systems , 2001 .

[55]  Eric N Schreffler,et al.  San Diego’s Interstate 15 Congestion Pricing Project: Traffic-Related Issues , 2002 .