The long-term nuclear explosives predicament : final disposal of military usable fissile material in nuclear waste from nuclear power and from the elimination of nuclear weapons

It is possible that the long-term global energy future does not turn out to be a breeder-reactor-based plutonium economy, but that a sustainable energy future based on renewable energy sources develops instead, i.e., a post-nuclear world. The thesis is based on a scenario where this is the case. Then large amounts of fissile material, that would otherwise to be consumed in the plutonium economy, will have to be disposed of as long-lived nuclear waste. This material is usable for the construction of nuclear explosives and consists of weapons-grade uranium and weapons-grade plutonium from nuclear weapons dismantled as a result of reductions of the nuclear arsenals, and reactor-grade plutonium produced in civil nuclear reactors, but not recycled. Regarding the possibilities of using reactor-grade plutonium for the construction of nuclear explosives, it is found that reactor-grade plutonium is an entirely credible fissile material for nuclear explosives, but that the increased spontaneous fission neutron background inherent in such material does provide an incentive for a nuclear explosives program to produce weapons-grade plutonium. On the other hand, laser isotope separation technology can be used to convert reactorgrade plutonium into weapons-grade plutonium. Present planning for the final disposal of spent nuclear reactor fuel that contains reactor-grade plutonium calls for the deposition of the material in mined geologic repositories. This disposal solution does, however, not make the fissile material “practicably irrecoverable” and safeguards would have to be put on the material for an indefinite time-period. Thus our generations, who utilize nuclear power, will leave a burden on future generations that do not. This is the long-term nuclear explosives predicament. In this thesis the predicament is examined. A scenario is described where the production of new military fissile material is halted and where civil nuclear power is phased out in a “no-new orders” case. It is found that approximately 1 100 tonnes of weapons-grade uranium, 233 tonnes of weapons-grade plutonium and 3 795 tonnes of reactor-grade plutonium has to be finally disposed of as nuclear waste, as the use of large-scale nuclear technology is phased out. This material could be used for the construction of over 1 million nuclear explosives and will be available for such purposes for a very long time. Reactor-grade plutonium is found to be easier to extract from spent nuclear fuel with time and some physical characteristics important for the construction of nuclear explosives are improved. However, the biggest problem, the large spontaneous neutron background, does not decrease. Alternative methods for disposal of the fissile material that will avoid the longterm nuclear explosives predicament are examined. Among these methods are dilution, denaturing or transmutation of the fissile material and options for practicably irrecoverable disposal in deep boreholes, on the sea-bed, and in space. Weighing in costs, environmental safety and public acceptance it is found that the deep boreholes method for disposal should be the primary alternative to be examined further. This method, which may make the fissile material more difficult to retrieve than from a mined repository, can be combined with an effort to “forget” where the material was put. This would, however, be a reversal of the present considerations where an attempt is planned to transfer as much information about the nuclear waste as possible into the future. Included in the thesis is also an evaluation of the possibilities of controlling the limited civil nuclear activities in a post-nuclear world. It is found that the opportunities for an effective safeguard regime are very favourable. Some surveillance technologies that might find widespread use in a post-nuclear world are described, including satellite surveillance. In a review part of the thesis, methods for the production of fissile material usable for the construction of nuclear explosives are described; the technological basis for the construction of nuclear weapons is examined, including the possibilities for using reactor-grade plutonium produced in civil nuclear power reactors for such purposes; also the present planning for the disposal of spent fuel from civil nuclear power reactors and for the handling of the fissile material from dismantled nuclear warheads is described. The Swedish plan for the handling and disposal of spent nuclear fuel is selected as a reference example of a spent fuel disposal system and is described in detail.

[1]  J. W. Roddy,et al.  Physical and decay characteristics of commercial LWR spent fuel , 1985 .

[2]  Lawrence Scheinman,et al.  The International Safeguards Problem , 1977 .

[3]  Hajime Miyashiro,et al.  Development of Partitioning and Transmutation Technology for Long-Lived Nuclides , 1991 .

[4]  B. Jasani,et al.  Satellites for arms control and crisis monitoring , 1987 .

[5]  Unoda Treaty between the United States of America and the union of soviet socialist republics on the elimination of their intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles , 1987 .

[6]  Cool Energy: The Renewable Solution to Global Warming , 1990 .

[7]  C Norman Weapons builders eye civilian reactor fuel. , 1981, Science.

[8]  W. Meyer,et al.  Homemade nuclear bomb syndrome , 1975 .

[9]  H. D. Smyth,et al.  A general account of the development of methods of using atomic energy for military purposes under the auspices of the United States Government 1940-1945 , 1945 .

[10]  W. Seifritz Nukleare Sprengkörper, Bedrohung oder Energieversorgung für die Menschheit? , 1984 .

[11]  Sam T. Cohen The Truth About the Neutron Bomb, The Inventor of the Bomb Speaks Out , 1983 .

[12]  S. Şahin The effect of Pu-240 on neutron lifetime in nuclear explosives , 1978 .

[13]  Richard B. Firestone,et al.  Table of Isotopes , 1978 .

[14]  Ralph Balent,et al.  Converting nuclear weapons to peaceful use , 1985 .

[15]  R. Pentreath Direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel , 1990 .

[16]  Lewis A. Dunn,et al.  Arms Control Verification and the New Role of On-Site Inspection , 1989 .

[17]  Theodore B. Taylor,et al.  Third-Generation Nuclear Weapons , 1987 .

[18]  Theodore B. Taylor Verified elimination of nuclear warheads , 1989 .

[19]  H. A. Feiveson,et al.  Security implications of alternative fission futures. [Risks and alternatives] , 1976 .

[20]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Radioactive Waste: Politics and Technology , 1993 .

[21]  J. Last Our common future. , 1987, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[22]  Johan Swahn International Surveillance Satellites - Open Skies for All? , 1988 .

[23]  W. Haefele,et al.  Energy from Nuclear Power , 1990 .

[24]  J. Goldblat Twenty years of the Non-proliferation Treaty : implementation and prospects , 1990 .

[25]  J. Powers,et al.  IAEA concerns about advanced containment and surveillance concepts or other alternative safeguards concepts , 1981 .

[26]  E Marshall Bomb factories of the 21st century. , 1989, Science.

[27]  Friedwardt Winterberg The physical principles of thermonuclear explosive devices , 1981 .

[28]  Georges A. Vendryes,et al.  Superphénix: A Full-Scale Breeder Reactor , 1977 .

[29]  Edwin Brown Firmage,et al.  The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons , 1969 .

[30]  M. Spaeth,et al.  Status and prospects for lasers in isotope separation , 1982 .

[31]  A. Devolpi Denaturing fissile materials , 1982 .

[32]  W. Madia,et al.  Coprocessing—An Evaluation of Chemical Reprocessing Without Plutonium Separation , 1978 .

[33]  Remote Sensing Temperature Mapping: the Thermal Plume Example , 1983 .

[34]  Security implications of remote sensing , 1988 .

[35]  James I. Davis,et al.  Atomic Vapor Laser Isotope Separation , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[36]  B. Levi,et al.  Stopping the Production of Fissile Materials for Weapons , 1985 .

[37]  C Norman Livermore wins laser battle. , 1982, Science.

[38]  W. C. Wolkenhauer,et al.  Transmutation of high-level radioactive waste with a controlled thermonuclear reactor , 1973 .

[39]  O. Rudnitskaya,et al.  Nuclear physics and nuclear reactors , 1975 .

[40]  J. Liljenzin,et al.  Reducing the long-term hazard of reactor waste through actinide removal and destruction in nuclear reactors , 1980 .

[41]  C. Cantrell Uranium Enrichment , 1974, Nature.

[42]  Darryl A. Howlett Euratom and Nuclear Safeguards , 1990 .

[43]  W. Seifritz Remarks on the Plutonium-240 Induced Pre-Ignition Problem in a Nuclear Device , 1981 .

[44]  B. Sanders Safeguards against nuclear proliferation , 1975 .

[45]  Robert S. Norris,et al.  Beating Swords into Swords , 1990 .

[46]  S. Beaman Actinide recycle in LMFBRs as a waste management alternative , 1975 .

[47]  Harold A. Feiveson Proliferation Resistant Nuclear Fuel Cycles , 1978 .

[48]  Steve Fetter,et al.  Detecting nuclear warheads , 1990 .

[49]  E. Hall,et al.  Radiobiology for the radiologist , 1973 .

[50]  P. L. Hendrickson,et al.  Options and regulatory issues related to disposition of fissile materials from arms reduction , 1990 .

[51]  A. De Volpi Proliferation, Plutonium and Policy: Institutional and Technological Impediments to Nuclear Weapons Propagation , 1979 .

[52]  P. Wydler,et al.  A Uranium-Plutonium-Neptunium Fuel Cycle to Produce Isotopically Denatured Plutonium , 1980 .

[53]  Chuck Hansen,et al.  U.S. Nuclear Weapons the Secret History , 1988 .

[54]  Amory B. Lovins Thorium cycles and proliferation , 1979 .

[55]  J. Schapira Long-term nuclear waste management: Present status and alternatives , 1989 .

[56]  G. Zorpette,et al.  Nuclear Waste: the challenge is global , 1990, IEEE Spectrum.

[57]  R. H. Rainey,et al.  Technical consideration of the use of nuclear fuel spikants for proliferation deterrence , 1979 .

[58]  S. Saleska,et al.  Hanford Cleanup: Explosive Solution , 1990 .

[59]  A. Schneider,et al.  The Role of Plutonium-238 in Nuclear Fuel Cycles , 1982 .

[60]  G. Lawrence High power linear accelerators for tritium production and transmutation of nuclear waste , 1991 .

[61]  J. Bonn,et al.  Laser resonant ionization of plutonium , 1985 .

[62]  G. Wicks,et al.  Doing something about high-level nuclear waste , 1989 .

[63]  Dan W. Reicher,et al.  High-tech protest against plutonium plant , 1988 .

[64]  Herbert F. York,et al.  The Advisors: Oppenheimer, Teller and the Superbomb , 1976 .

[65]  J. Paisner Atomic vapor laser isotope separation , 1988 .

[66]  E Marshall Debate Continues on the Bomb That Wasn't. , 1980, Science.

[67]  Reed Robert Burn Research, training, test and production reactor directory : United States of America , 1988 .

[68]  Leonard S. Spector,et al.  Nuclear Ambitions: The Spread Of Nuclear Weapons 1989-1990 , 1990 .

[69]  Marianne Hanson,et al.  The International Atomic Energy Agency , 2021, Nature.

[70]  T. Johansson Sweden's abortive nuclear weapons project , 1986 .

[71]  K.K.S. Pillay International safeguards concerns of spent fuel disposal program , 1988 .

[72]  Energy Program Nuclear Proliferation and Safeguards: Appendix Volume II, Part One , 1977 .

[73]  M. Cross Japan's nuclear power tightrope , 1991, IEEE Spectrum.

[74]  T. H. Pigford Waste transmutation and public acceptance , 1991 .

[75]  E. Otten,et al.  Trace detection of plutonium by three-step photoionization with a laser system pumped by a copper vapor laser , 1985 .

[76]  A. T. Jr. Peaslee Some political issues related to future special nuclear materials production , 1981 .

[77]  A DeVolpi Fissile Materials and Nuclear Weapons Proliferation , 1986 .

[78]  Gregory R. Choppin,et al.  Nuclear Chemistry: Theory and Applications , 1980 .

[79]  Franklin G. Sadowski,et al.  Processing and analysis of commercial satellite image data of the nuclear accident near Chernobyl, U.S.S.R. , 1987 .

[80]  Robert Jungk,et al.  Book Reviews: Brighter Than a Thousand Suns. A Personal History of the Atomic Scientists , 1958 .

[81]  Oecd Compass Environmental impacts of renewable energy : the OECD COMPASS Project , 1988 .

[82]  K. Kompa,et al.  The practical and physical aspect of uranium isotope separation with lasers , 1982 .

[83]  Unoda Treaty between the United States of America and the union of soviet socialist republics on the reduction and limitation of strategic offensive arms , 1979 .

[84]  S. Şahin Reply to “Remarks on the Plutonium-240 Induced Pre-Ignition Problem in a Nuclear Device” , 1981 .

[85]  William F. Lawless Problems with military nuclear waste , 1985 .

[86]  P. Gummett Uranium enrichment and nuclear weapon proliferation , 1983 .

[87]  B. Collén ISOTOPE EFFECTS IN ELECTROLYSIS OF SOLID LITHIUM HYDRIDE , 1964 .

[88]  V. Letokhov,et al.  Laser isotope separation , 1979, Nature.

[89]  R H Williams,et al.  Fission Power: An Evolutionary Strategy , 1979, Science.

[90]  Eugene A. Rosa,et al.  Nuclear Politics: Energy and the State in the United States, Sweden, and France. , 1990 .

[91]  F.P.J. Robotham,et al.  The Geological Disposal of Nuclear Waste , 1988 .

[92]  L. De Geer,et al.  Early Measurements of the Chernobyl Fallout in Sweden , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[93]  R. M. Smith,et al.  Safeguards problems and possible solutions with deep underground disposal of used nuclear fuel and fuel recycle waste , 1987 .

[94]  P. H. Tannenbaum Communication across 300 generations: deterring human interference with waste deposit sites , 1984 .

[95]  Edward Teller,et al.  The Constructive Uses of Nuclear Explosives , 1968 .

[96]  Simon Ramo Arms reduction: An ambitious proposal , 1982, IEEE Spectrum.

[97]  Thomas B. Cochran,et al.  So Little Time, So Many Weapons, So Much to Do , 1992 .

[98]  C Norman Congress, DOE Battle Over British Plutonium: DOE refuses to give up the option of using plutonium from the civilian R & D program, including 4 tons imported from Britain, to make weapons. , 1984, Science.

[99]  Robert E. Berlin,et al.  Radioactive Waste Management , 1989 .

[100]  Ingemar Vintersved,et al.  The Swedish Air Monitoring Network for Particulate Radioactivity , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[101]  H. Forsström,et al.  Radioactive waste management. Facilities and planning in Sweden , 1988 .

[102]  B. Collén ELECTROLYTIC SEPARATION OF LITHIUM ISOTOPES IN AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS OF LITHIUM CHLORIDE USING A MERCURY CATHODE , 1963 .

[103]  D. G. Hurst,et al.  Reactor Physics Constants , 1964 .

[104]  M. Reiss Without the Bomb: The Politics of Nuclear Nonproliferation , 1989 .

[105]  L O Love,et al.  Electromagnetic Separation of Isotopes at Oak Ridge , 1973, Science.

[106]  Mary D. Davis The Military-civilian Nuclear Link: A Guide To The French Nuclear Industry , 1987 .

[107]  A S Krass,et al.  Laser enrichment of uranium: the proliferation connection. , 1977, Science.

[108]  Jozef Goldblat Non-Proliferation , 2020 .

[109]  David Alan Rosenberg,et al.  The Origins of Overkill: Nuclear Weapons and American Strategy, 1945-1960 , 1983 .

[110]  Ann M. Florini The Opening Skies: Third-Party Imaging Satellites and U.S. Security , 1988 .

[111]  C. Heising-Goodman An Evaluation of the Plutonium Denaturing Concept as an Effective Safeguards Method , 1980 .

[112]  Andrew J. Pierre,et al.  Nuclear Proliferation Today: The Spread of Nuclear Weapons 1984 , 1985 .

[113]  Thomas A. Sebeok,et al.  Communication Measures to Bridge Ten Millennia , 1984 .

[114]  Thomas B. Cochran,et al.  Nuclear weapons databook , 1983 .

[115]  Cesare Silvi Nuclear Warhead Dismantlement and Possible Reuse in Civil Nuclear Power Reactors , 1991 .

[116]  Barry M. Casper Laser enrichment: a new path to proliferation , 1977 .

[117]  A. Lovins Nuclear weapons and power-reactor plutonium , 1980, Nature.

[118]  J. Duderstadt,et al.  Preliminary design and neutronic analysis of a laser fusion driven actinide waste burning hybrid reactor , 1979 .

[119]  O. J. Wick Plutonium handbook : a guide to the technology , 1967 .

[120]  R. Zare LASER SEPARATION OF ISOTOPES , 1977 .

[121]  Albert Wohlstetter Spreading the Bomb without Quite Breaking the Rules , 1976 .

[122]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[123]  K. Keller Peaceful Nuclear Explosions II , 1973 .

[124]  José Goldemberg,et al.  Energy for a sustainable world , 1987 .

[125]  J. G. Hoffman,et al.  Day of Trinity , 1966 .