Identification of Methods of Reducing Construction Waste in Construction Enterprises Based on Surveys

The article presents the analysis of the dependence between methods of reducing construction waste and the size of the construction enterprise. The analysis was carried out for the following construction products: steel, concrete, wood, and small-sized (ceramic, concrete) and finishing (ceramic and stone tiles) products. Based on the literature review, the 13 most frequently used methods of reducing construction waste were identified. Surveys were then conducted among 140 construction enterprises. The research was conducted in Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates. In order to test whether there is a relationship between the used waste-reduction method for a given construction product and the size of the enterprise, the Pearson chi-square test of independence was used. The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis were formulated, and the critical level of significance α = 0.05 was adopted. The results were statistically significant for 7 methods of reducing construction waste. The identified methods include appropriate storage, the training of employees in the field of waste management, the use of monitoring systems, the appropriate transport and unloading of products, the appropriate involvement of subcontractors, the use of prefabricated elements, and the reuse of products on the construction site. Based on the conducted research, it was found that these methods are more often used with an increase in the size of the enterprise. The presented analysis emphasizes the urgent need to improve, integrate, and adjust the promotion of both the reduction of construction waste and the benefits of this reduction in construction enterprises, especially those of the smallest size.

[1]  Vivian W. Y. Tam,et al.  Construction Waste Management Profiles, Practices, and Performance: A Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis in Four Countries , 2016 .

[2]  Karl Pearson F.R.S. X. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling , 2009 .

[3]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: a lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability , 2013, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[4]  Hjh Jos Brouwers,et al.  Construction Waste: Quantification and Source Evaluation , 1996 .

[5]  Alfred Strauss,et al.  Correlation among selected fracture‐mechanical parameters of concrete obtained from experiments and inverse analyses , 2016 .

[6]  S. Ghaffar,et al.  Pathways to circular construction: An integrated management of construction and demolition waste for resource recovery , 2020 .

[7]  Assem Al-Hajj,et al.  Material Waste in the UAE Construction Industry: Main Causes and Minimization Practices , 2011 .

[8]  Leonhard E. Bernold,et al.  Source evaluation of solid waste in building construction , 1994 .

[9]  Paola Villoria Sáez,et al.  Best practice measures assessment for construction and demolition waste management in building constructions , 2013 .

[10]  Ibrahim Mahamid Impact of rework on material waste in building construction projects , 2020 .

[11]  Ruoyu Jin,et al.  Science mapping approach to assisting the review of construction and demolition waste management research published between 2009 and 2018 , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[12]  K Moustakas,et al.  Preliminary study for the management of construction and demolition waste , 2008, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[13]  Jiayuan Wang,et al.  Status quo and future directions of construction and demolition waste research: A critical review , 2019 .

[14]  César Porras-Amores,et al.  Estimation of construction and demolition waste volume generation in new residential buildings in Spain , 2012, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[15]  Shuai Zhou,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis for the Polymeric Microcapsules in Self-Healing Cementitious Composites , 2020, Polymers.

[16]  Ghanim A. Bekr Study of the Causes and Magnitude of Wastage of Materials on Construction Sites in Jordan , 2014 .

[17]  Olabode Emmanuel Ogunmakinde,et al.  Waste minimisation strategies at the design phase: Architects' response. , 2020, Waste management.

[18]  P. Graham,et al.  Employee perceptions of the solid waste management system operating in a large Australian contracting organization: implications for company policy implementation , 2000 .

[19]  Tasnia Hassan Nazifa,et al.  An empirical study of construction and demolition waste generation and implication of recycling. , 2019, Waste management.

[20]  Jingkuang Liu,et al.  Exploring factors influencing construction waste reduction: A structural equation modeling approach , 2020 .

[21]  Libo Yan,et al.  A Comprehensive Review on Recycled Aggregate and Recycled Aggregate Concrete , 2021 .

[22]  Xiaowei Deng,et al.  Multi-scale response sensitivity analysis based on direct differentiation method for concrete structures , 2019, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[23]  Jianguo Chen,et al.  Considerations for better construction and demolition waste management: Identifying the decision behaviors of contractors and government departments through a game theory decision-making model , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[24]  George Ofori,et al.  Building waste assessment score: design-based tool , 2004 .

[25]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Sustainable recycling approach: an understanding of designers' and contractors' recycling responsibilities throughout the life cycle of buildings in two US cities , 2012 .