The second phase of bipolar, nanosecond-range electric pulses determines the electroporation efficiency.

Bipolar cancellation refers to a phenomenon when applying a second electric pulse reduces ("cancels") cell membrane damage by a preceding electric pulse of the opposite polarity. Bipolar cancellation is a reason why bipolar nanosecond electric pulses (nsEP) cause weaker electroporation than just a single unipolar phase of the same pulse. This study was undertaken to explore the dependence of bipolar cancellation on nsEP parameters, with emphasis on the amplitude ratio of two opposite polarity phases of a bipolar pulse. Individual cells (CHO, U937, or adult mouse ventricular cardiomyocytes (VCM)) were exposed to either uni- or bipolar trapezoidal nsEP, or to nanosecond electric field oscillations (NEFO). The membrane injury was evaluated by time-lapse confocal imaging of the uptake of propidium (Pr) or YO-PRO-1 (YP) dyes and by phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization. Within studied limits, bipolar cancellation showed little or no dependence on the electric field intensity, pulse repetition rate, chosen endpoint, or cell type. However, cancellation could increase for larger pulse numbers and/or for longer pulses. The sole most critical parameter which determines bipolar cancellation was the phase ratio: maximum cancellation was observed with the 2nd phase of about 50% of the first one, whereas a larger 2nd phase could add a damaging effect of its own. "Swapping" the two phases, i.e., delivering the smaller phase before the larger one, reduced or eliminated cancellation. These findings are discussed in the context of hypothetical mechanisms of bipolar cancellation and electroporation by nsEP.

[1]  Mojca Pavlin,et al.  Electro‐mediated gene transfer and expression are controlled by the life‐time of DNA/membrane complex formation , 2010, The journal of gene medicine.

[2]  Chunqi Jiang,et al.  Electroporation of mammalian cells by nanosecond electric field oscillations and its inhibition by the electric field reversal , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Hope T. Beier,et al.  Cancellation of cellular responses to nanoelectroporation by reversing the stimulus polarity , 2014, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[4]  Bennett L Ibey,et al.  Lipid nanopores can form a stable, ion channel-like conduction pathway in cell membrane. , 2009, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[5]  L Tung,et al.  Electroporation of Cardiac Cell Membranes with Monophasic or Biphasic Rectangular Pulses , 1991, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  Rosana Almada Bassani,et al.  Lethal Effect of Electric Fields on Isolated Ventricular Myocytes , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Muriel Golzio,et al.  Effect of electric field vectoriality on electrically mediated gene delivery in mammalian cells. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[8]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[9]  Shu Xiao,et al.  Electropermeabilization by uni- or bipolar nanosecond electric pulses: The impact of extracellular conductivity. , 2018, Bioelectrochemistry.

[10]  Laura Marcu,et al.  Nanoelectropulse-induced phosphatidylserine translocation. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[11]  C. Dunnett A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control , 1955 .

[12]  Shu Xiao,et al.  Electroporation-Induced Electrosensitization , 2011, PloS one.

[13]  Caterina Merla,et al.  Frequency spectrum of induced transmembrane potential and permeabilization efficacy of bipolar electric pulses. , 2017, Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes.

[14]  L. Mir,et al.  Cell membrane electropermeabilization by symmetrical bipolar rectangular pulses. Part I. Increased efficiency of permeabilization. , 2001, Bioelectrochemistry.

[15]  A. Pakhomov,et al.  Gadolinium modifies the cell membrane to inhibit permeabilization by nanosecond electric pulses. , 2015, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[16]  D Miklavcic,et al.  Cell membrane electropermeabilization by symmetrical bipolar rectangular pulses. Part II. Reduced electrolytic contamination. , 2001, Bioelectrochemistry.

[17]  A. T. Esser,et al.  Mechanisms for the intracellular manipulation of organelles by conventional electroporation. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[18]  O. Pakhomova,et al.  Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane. , 2015, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[19]  Andrei G. Pakhomov,et al.  Analysis of Plasma Membrane Integrity by Fluorescent Detection of Tl+ Uptake , 2010, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[20]  E. Tekle,et al.  Electroporation by using bipolar oscillating electric field: an improved method for DNA transfection of NIH 3T3 cells. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  O. Pakhomova,et al.  Facilitation of electroporative drug uptake and cell killing by electrosensitization , 2013, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[22]  Shinji Hirakawa,et al.  High-Voltage, Multiphasic, Nanosecond Pulses to Modulate Cellular Responses , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[23]  Caleb C Roth,et al.  Bipolar nanosecond electric pulses are less efficient at electropermeabilization and killing cells than monopolar pulses. , 2014, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[24]  O. Pakhomova,et al.  Calcium-mediated pore expansion and cell death following nanoelectroporation. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[25]  Z. Levine,et al.  Quantitative Limits on Small Molecule Transport via the Electropermeome — Measuring and Modeling Single Nanosecond Perturbations , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[26]  O. Pakhomova,et al.  Activation of the phospholipid scramblase TMEM16F by nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEF) facilitates its diverse cytophysiological effects , 2017, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  Erick K. Moen,et al.  Asymmetrical bipolar nanosecond electric pulse widths modify bipolar cancellation , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[28]  D Miklavcic,et al.  Role of pulse shape in cell membrane electropermeabilization. , 2003, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[29]  Bennett L. Ibey,et al.  Ion transport into cells exposed to monopolar and bipolar nanosecond pulses. , 2015, Bioelectrochemistry.

[30]  William E Louch,et al.  Methods in cardiomyocyte isolation, culture, and gene transfer. , 2011, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[31]  O. Pakhomova,et al.  Delayed hypersensitivity to nanosecond pulsed electric field in electroporated cells , 2017, Scientific Reports.