Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality.

PURPOSE To evaluate prospectively the effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality at 64-section computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study protocol had local ethics committee approval; written informed consent was obtained. There were 125 patients (45 women, 80 men; mean age, 59.9 years +/- 12.9 [standard deviation]; 79 receiving beta-blockers) who underwent 64-section CT coronary angiography with retrospective electrocardiographic gating. Data sets were reconstructed in 5% steps from 20% to 80% of R-R interval. Heart rate variability was calculated as 1 standard deviation from mean rate during scanning. Two observers rated image quality of each coronary segment at least 1.5-mm diameter (1 = no motion artifacts, 5 = not evaluative). Repeated analysis of variance measurements were performed to evaluate quantitative parameters. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to compare image quality in each patient with average heart rate and heart rate variability. RESULTS Average heart rate was 63.3 beats per minute +/- 13.1, with variability of 3.2 beats per minute +/- 2.1. Diagnostic image quality (score < or = 3) was attained in 1821 of 1836 segments at the best reconstruction interval. There was no correlation between mean heart rate and image quality for all segments of the right coronary and left anterior descending arteries, but there was a significant correlation for left circumflex artery (r = 0.33, P < .05). Heart rate variability was correlated with image quality overall (r = 0.75, P < .001) and for each coronary artery. Heart rate was less variable and image quality was better (P < .05) in patients receiving beta-blockers. Best image quality was obtained in diastole with heart rate less than 80 beats per minute and in systole with faster heart rate. CONCLUSION Coronary angiography with 64-section CT provides diagnostic image quality within a wide range of heart rates. Reducing average heart rate and heart rate variability is beneficial for reducing artifacts.

[1]  B. Ohnesorge,et al.  Heart Rate Adaptive Optimization of Spatial and Temporal Resolution for Electrocardiogram-Gated Multislice Spiral CT of the Heart , 2001, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  T. Flohr,et al.  Coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and optimal reconstruction window in retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT at 375-ms gantry rotation time , 2005, European Radiology.

[3]  C. Herzog,et al.  Heart-rate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector-row cardiac CT: influence of physiological and technical prerequisite on image quality , 2002, European Radiology.

[4]  M F Reiser,et al.  ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. , 2001, Radiology.

[5]  Michael Grass,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. , 2005, Radiology.

[6]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.

[7]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[8]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography , 2001, The Lancet.

[9]  M. Budoff,et al.  Coronary Artery Motion During the Cardiac Cycle and Optimal ECG Triggering for Coronary Artery Imaging , 2001, Investigative radiology.

[10]  K Stierstorfer,et al.  Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot. , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[11]  C. Claussen,et al.  Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography: experience in 94 patients. , 2002, Clinical imaging.

[12]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. , 2005 .

[13]  S. Shim,et al.  Improvement of image quality with beta-blocker premedication on ECG-gated 16-MDCT coronary angiography. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  E. Wenkel,et al.  Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Qiao-wei Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with a high heart rate using 16-slice spiral computed tomography with 0.37-s gantry rotation time , 2005, European Radiology.

[16]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[17]  W Moshage,et al.  In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: measurement with electron-beam CT. , 2000, Radiology.

[18]  T Akasaka,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary flow velocity and coronary flow velocity reserve in the left anterior descending coronary artery by Doppler echocardiography: comparison with invasive technique. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  W. Bautz,et al.  Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses With Thin-Slice Multi-Detector Row Spiral Computed Tomography and Multiplanar Reconstruction , 2003, Circulation.

[20]  P. Serruys,et al.  Large thrombus entrapped in a patent foramen ovale of the atrial septum, which apparently “disappeared” without embolic events , 2002, Heart.

[21]  G. Simonetti,et al.  Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. , 2004, European heart journal.

[22]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.