MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS: ERP VERSUS BOB

The purpose of this study is to compare the use of enterprise resource planning (ERP) and best of breed (BoB) standalone systems in practice. The data for the study were collected through a postal questionnaire in 300 large and middle-sized industrial units in Finland. The questionnaire addressed questions concerning IS implementation (why, how and by whom the IS project was introduced), management accounting function, and the use of advanced management accounting techniques. The results obtained indicate that financial departments have been more interested in traditional BoB systems, while other departments have concentrated more on ERP solutions. Further, as the articulated motives behind the IS project were strategic, and moreover technical in nature, the solution in most cases was ERP, while in the cases where motives were either strategic or technical, the choice was BoB. Otherwise, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups of BoB or ERP adopters, and the problems perceived in management accounting or the adoption of advanced management accounting techniques (e.g. ABC, ABM and BSC).

[1]  Universite’LavaE.  THE EFFECT OF STRATEGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ON THE ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING * , 2003 .

[2]  Robert Newton Anthony,et al.  The management control function , 1988 .

[3]  Paolo Maccarrone,et al.  The impact of ERPs on management accounting and control systems and the changing role of controllers , 2000 .

[4]  M. Granlund,et al.  It is a Small World of Management Accounting Practices , 1998 .

[5]  Thomas H. Johnson,et al.  Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting , 1987 .

[6]  M. Morton,et al.  The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation , 1993 .

[7]  David Dugdale,et al.  How many companies use ABC for stock valuation? A comment on Innes and Mitchell's questionnaire findings , 1997 .

[8]  Falconer Mitchell,et al.  Survey research on activity-based costing: a reply to Dugdale and Jones , 1997 .

[9]  Teemu Malmi,et al.  Moderate impact of ERPS on management accounting: a lag or permanent outcome? , 2002 .

[10]  T. Davenport.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[11]  Charles T. Horngren.  Management and Cost Accounting , 2001 .

[12]  Maurice Gosselin.  The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing , 1997 .

[13]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  ERP and application integration: Exploratory survey , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[14]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[15]  M. A. Rashid,et al.  Evolution of ERP Systems , 2005, Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology.

[16]  Angela Lin,et al.  Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems , 2001 .

[17]  T. Malmi.  Adoption and Implementation of Activity-Based Costing: Practice, Problems and Motives , 1997 .

[18]  Teemu Malmi,et al.  Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms , 1999 .

[19]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  SAP: integrated information systems and the implications for management accountants , 1998 .

[20]  Trond Bjørnenak.  Diffusion and accounting: the case of ABC in Norway , 1997 .

[21]  Urban Ask,et al.  Trends in the Development of Product Costing Practices and Techniques , 1992 .

[22]  Trevor Hopper,et al.  What does organizational change mean?: Speculations on a taken for granted category , 2001 .

[23]  Murrell G. Shields.  E-Business and ERP: Rapid Implementation and Project Planning , 2001 .

[24]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The promise--and peril--of integrated cost systems. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[25]  Ben Light,et al.  ERP and best of breed: a comparative analysis , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[26]  M. Castells,et al.  The Finnish Model of the Information Society , 2002 .

[27]  Bo-Göran Ekholm,et al.  Is the annual budget really dead? , 2000 .

[28]  Donald E. Riggs.  Competing in the third wave: The ten key management issues of the information age , 1998 .

[29]  J. A. Burns,et al.  Breeding for the best , 1985 .

[30]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[31]  Linda Duxbury.  The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation , 1993 .

[32]  Robin Cooper,et al.  Design of Cost Management Systems , 1998 .

[33]  T. Seppälä,et al.  The Practice of Management Accounting in Finland - a Change? , 2002 .

[34]  W. D. Schulte.  The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. , 2005 .

[35]  Markus Granlund,et al.  Cost accounting in Finland: current practice and trends of development , 1996 .