Using lean methodology to improve efficiency of electronic order set maintenance in the hospital

Order sets, a series of orders focused around a diagnosis, condition, or treatment, can reinforce best practice, help eliminate outdated practice, and provide clinical guidance. However, order sets require regular updates as evidence and care processes change. We undertook a quality improvement intervention applying lean methodology to create a systematic process for order set review and maintenance. Root cause analysis revealed challenges with unclear prioritization of requests, lack of coordination between teams, and lack of communication between producers and requestors of order sets. In March of 2014, we implemented a systematic, cyclical order set review process, with a set schedule, defined responsibilities for various stakeholders, formal meetings and communication between stakeholders, and transparency of the process. We first identified and deactivated 89 order sets which were infrequently used. Between March and August 2014, 142 order sets went through the new review process. Processing time for the build duration of order sets decreased from a mean of 79.6 to 43.2 days (p<.001, CI=22.1, 50.7). Applying Lean production principles to the order set review process resulted in significant improvement in processing time and increased quality of orders. As use of order sets and other forms of clinical decision support increase, regular evidence and process updates become more critical.

[1]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  Improving Outcomes with Clinical Decision Support , 2012 .

[2]  David W. Bates,et al.  Governance for clinical decision support: case studies and recommended practices from leading institutions , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  Patricia Kipnis,et al.  An electronic order set for acute myocardial infarction is associated with improved patient outcomes through better adherence to clinical practice guidelines. , 2014, Journal of hospital medicine.

[4]  Ferdinand T. Velasco,et al.  Improving Outcomes with Clinical Decision Support: An Implementer's Guide , 2012 .

[5]  Mark Spranca,et al.  Reduction in medication errors in hospitals due to adoption of computerized provider order entry systems , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  K Henriksen,et al.  The Impact of Standardized Order Sets on Quality and Financial Outcomes -- Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 2: Culture and Redesign) , 2008 .

[7]  Gary S Kaplan,et al.  Why Lean doesn't work for everyone , 2014, BMJ quality & safety.

[8]  John D. McGreevey,et al.  Order sets in electronic health records: principles of good practice. , 2013, Chest.

[9]  D. Ballard,et al.  Implementing a standardized order set for community-acquired pneumonia: impact on mortality and cost. , 2009, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[10]  Julie Gunderson,et al.  The Impact of Standardized Order Sets on Quality and Financial Outcomes , 2008 .

[11]  Michael G Leu,et al.  Systematic Update of Computerized Physician Order Entry Order Sets to Improve Quality of Care: A Case Study , 2013, Pediatrics.

[12]  Charlotte A. Weaver,et al.  Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.