Pedestrian Kinematics Investigation with Finite Element Dummy Models Based on AnthropometryScaling Method

Pedestrian-vehicle impact experiments using cadavers have shown that factors such as vehicle shape and pedestrian anthropometry can influence pedestrian kinematics and injury mechanisms. While a parametric study examining these factors could elucidate the complex relationships that govern pedestrian kinematics, it would be impractical with cadaver tests due to the relative expense involved in performing numerous experiments on subjects with varying anthropometry. On the other hand, finite element (FE) modeling represents a more feasible approach since numerous experiments can be conducted for a fraction of the expense. The current study examined the relationship between pedestrian anthropometry and front shape of a mid-size sedan using a PAM-CRASH model of the 50th percentile male (50th) Polar-II pedestrian dummy extensively validated against experimental data. In order to evaluate the influence of pedestrian anthropometry on response kinematics, scaled dummy models were developed based on the weight and height of the 5th percentile female (5th F) and 95th percentile male (95th M). Simulations of the 5th F, 50th F, 50th M, and 95th Polar-II FE models struck at 40 km/h by a midsize sedan were used to generate trajectories of the head, upper thorax, mid-thorax, and pelvis. In an effort to assess the validity of scaling techniques when interpreting trajectory data from vehicle-pedestrian crashes, the trajectories of the 5th F, 50th F and 95th M model were scaled to the 50th M and compared to those generated with the 50th model. The results demonstrated nonlinear behavior of dummy kinematics that could not be accounted for with traditional linear scaling techniques.

[1]  Jeffrey Richard Crandall,et al.  Biofidelity Evaluation for the Knee and Leg of the Polar Pedestrian Dummy , 2005 .

[2]  Jeffrey Richard Crandall,et al.  Lateral Injury Criteria for the 6-year-old Pedestrian - Part I: Criteria for the Head, Neck, Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis , 2004 .

[3]  Hirotoshi Ishikawa,et al.  SUMMARY OF IHRA PEDESTRIAN SAFETY WG ACTIVITIES (2005) - PROPOSED TEST METHODS TO EVALUATE PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION AFFORDED BY PASSENGER CARS , 2001 .

[4]  Andreas Seidl,et al.  RAMSIS - A New CAD-Tool for Ergonomic Analysis of Vehicles Developed for the German Automotive Industry , 1997 .

[5]  Akihiko Akiyama,et al.  Development of performance specifications for a pedestrian research dummy , 2005 .

[6]  Check Y. Kam,et al.  Kinematic Corridors for PMHS Tested in Full-Scale Pedestrian Impact Tests , 2005 .

[7]  Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.  Investigating Pedestrian Kinematics with the Polar-II Finite Element Model , 2007 .

[8]  John T. McConville,et al.  Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics 1988 , 1989 .

[9]  Claire C. Gordon,et al.  2012 Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics , 2014 .

[10]  Akihiko Akiyama,et al.  Development and application of the new pedestrian dummy , 2001 .

[11]  Benoît Besnault,et al.  A PARAMETRIC FINITE ELEMENT MODEL OF THE HUMAN PELVIS , 1998 .

[12]  H. Langhaar Dimensional analysis and theory of models , 1951 .

[13]  Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.  Kinematic comparison of the Polar-II and PMHS in pedestrian impact tests with a sport-utility vehicle , 2005 .

[14]  Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.  Development and Validation of a Finite Element Model for the Polar-II Upper Body , 2006 .

[15]  Cheol Oh,et al.  Research and Rule-Making Activities on Pedestrian Protection in Korea , 2005 .

[16]  Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.  Pedestrian kinematic response to mid-sized vehicle impact , 2007 .

[17]  Yutaka Okamoto,et al.  A STUDY OF THE UPPER LEG COMPONENT TESTS COMPARED WITH PEDESTRIAN DUMMY TESTS , 2001 .

[18]  D. H. Robbins,et al.  Development of anthropometrically based design specifications for an advanced adult anthropomorphic dummy family, volume 1 , 1983 .