The implementation of total quality management in Canada and Mexico: a case study

Total quality management (TQM) gained its popularity during the last decade and continues to have a profound impact on business strategies today. Using the case method, this research examines the influence of national culture on the successful or unsuccessful implementation of TQM in Canada and Mexico. Focused interviews are used to compare the TQM implementation process in two plants in Canada and Mexico. As hypothesized, the qualitative results suggest that a firm in a collectivistic culture, such as Mexico, is more successful at implementing TQM than a firm in an individualistic culture, such as Canada. This is because the collectivistic culture has more TQM beliefs and values than the individualistic culture. The implications of these findings for organizations in collectivistic and individualistic cultures are discussed.

[1]  Charles M. Vance,et al.  An Examination of the Transferability of Traditional Performance Appraisal Principles across Cultural Boundaries , 1992 .

[2]  Richard Florida,et al.  THE TRANSFER OF JAPANESE MANAGEMENT STYLES IN TWO US TRANSPLANT INDUSTRIES: AUTOS AND ELECTRONICS , 1995 .

[3]  David I. Levine,et al.  Product quality and pay equity between lower-level employees and top management: An investigation of distributive justice theory. , 1992 .

[4]  G. Hofstede.  Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? , 1980 .

[5]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Total quality and human resources management: lessons learned from Baldrige Award-winning companies , 1993 .

[6]  R. Schroeder,et al.  A THEORY OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT UNDERLYING THE DEMING MANAGEMENT METHOD , 1994 .

[7]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  Management in developing countries , 1993 .

[8]  P. Earley,et al.  Culture, self-identity, and work , 1993 .

[9]  A. Kimball Romney,et al.  Variations in value orientations. , 1961 .

[10]  Dae Ryun Chang,et al.  Global Quality Management: A Research Focus* , 1995 .

[11]  Carol Reeves,et al.  DEFINING QUALITY: ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS , 1994 .

[12]  Joseph Moses Juran.  Juran on leadership for quality : an executive handbook , 1989 .

[13]  K. Leung.  Some determinants of reactions to procedural models for conflict resolution: A cross-national study. , 1987 .

[14]  J. Dean,et al.  MANAGEMENT THEORY AND TOTAL QUALITY: IMPROVING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE THROUGH THEORY DEVELOPMENT , 1994 .

[15]  Joseph Moses Juran.  Juran on Leadership For Quality , 1989 .

[16]  M. Sashkin,et al.  Does fairness make a difference , 1990 .

[17]  T. R. Miller,et al.  The Japanese Management Theory Jungle-Revisited , 1994 .

[18]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[19]  H. Triandis.  The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[20]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[21]  H. Triandis,et al.  Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. , 1990 .

[22]  David A. Waldman,et al.  THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT TO A THEORY OF WORK PERFORMANCE , 1994 .

[23]  Santiago Gutiérrez.  Can you make it in Mexico , 1993 .

[24]  Barbara A. Spencer,et al.  MODELS OF ORGANIZATION AND TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT: A COMPARISON AND CRITICAL EVALUATION , 1994 .

[25]  P. Earley.  East Meets West Meets Mideast: Further Explorations Of Collectivistic and Individualistic Work Groups , 1993 .

[26]  John Humphrey,et al.  THE ADOPTION OF JAPANESE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES IN BRAZILIAN INDUSTRY , 1995 .

[27]  Greg J. Bamber,et al.  The International Transferability of Japanese Management Strategies: An Australian Perspective , 1992 .

[28]  Mariah E. de Forest.  Thinking of a plant in Mexico , 1994 .

[29]  M. Kuhn,et al.  An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. , 1954 .

[30]  R. Brislin.  Cross-cultural research methods , 1973 .