Simple variance reduction in Monte Carlo calculations of specific absorbed fractions: Russian roulette and splitting at the source organ

Purpose: To investigate the capabilities of several variance reduction techniques in the calculation of specific absorbed fractions in cases where the source and the target organs are far away and/or the target organs have a small volume. Methods: The specific absorbed fractions have been calculated by using the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE and by assuming the thyroid gland as the source organ and the testicles, the urinary bladder, the uterus, and the ovaries as the target ones. A mathematical anthropomorphic phantom, similar to the MIRD-type phantoms, has been considered. Photons with initial energies of 50, 100 and 500 keV were emitted isotropically from the volume of the source organ. Simulations have been carried out by implementing the variance reduction techniques of splitting and Russian roulette at the source organ only and the interaction forcing at the target organs. The influence of the implementation details of those techniques have been investigated and optimal parameters have been determined. All simulations were run with a CPU time of 1.5 · 105 s. Results: Specific absorbed fractions with relative uncertainties well below 10% have been obtained in most cases, agreeing with those used as reference. The best value for the factor defining the application of the Russian roulette technique was r = 0.3. The best value for the splitting number was between s = 3 and s = 10, depending on the specific energies and target organs. Conclusions: The proposed strategy provides an effective method for computing specific absorbed fractions for the most unfavorable situations, with a computing effort that is considerably reduced with respect to other methodologies.

[1]  L. P. Neves,et al.  Estimate of S-values for children due to six positron emitting radionuclides used in PET examinations , 2017 .

[2]  N Petoussi-Henss,et al.  ICRP Publication 133: The ICRP computational framework for internal dose assessment for reference adults: specific absorbed fractions , 2016, Annals of the ICRP.

[3]  A M Lallena,et al.  Monte Carlo calculation of specific absorbed fractions: variance reduction techniques , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Markus Luster,et al.  EANM Dosimetry Committee Series on Standard Operational Procedures for Pre-Therapeutic Dosimetry II. Dosimetry prior to radioiodine therapy of benign thyroid diseases , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  A. Lallena,et al.  Specific absorbed fractions in thyroid diagnostics and treatment: Monte Carlo calculation with PENELOPE. , 2012, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[6]  S Ted Treves,et al.  Internal photon and electron dosimetry of the newborn patient---a hybrid computational phantom study , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Hossein Rajabi,et al.  Assessment of MIRD data for internal dosimetry using the GATE Monte Carlo code , 2011, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[8]  H. Schlattl,et al.  Application of the ICRP/ICRU reference computational phantoms to internal dosimetry: calculation of specific absorbed fractions of energy for photons and electrons , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  N Petoussi-Henss,et al.  New calculations for internal dosimetry of beta-emitting radiopharmaceuticals. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[10]  C Hoeschen,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of biokinetic models for radiopharmaceuticals used in nuclear medicine. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[11]  Jiajin Fan,et al.  PHOTON SAF CALCULATION BASED ON THE CHINESE MATHEMATICAL PHANTOM AND COMPARISON WITH THE ORNL PHANTOMS , 2008, Health physics.

[12]  Michael G Stabin,et al.  Uncertainties in Internal Dose Calculations for Radiopharmaceuticals , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  H. Hakimabad,et al.  Evaluation of specific absorbed fractions from internal photon sources in ORNL analytical adult phantom. , 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[14]  J. K. Lee,et al.  Specific absorbed fraction for Korean adult voxel phantom from internal photon source. , 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[15]  A. Lallena,et al.  Dose distribution in water for monoenergetic photon point sources in the energy range of interest in brachytherapy: Monte Carlo simulations with PENELOPE and GEANT4 , 2006, physics/0612045.

[16]  Jack Valentin,et al.  A report like no other , 2006 .

[17]  Markus Luster,et al.  Iodine biokinetics and dosimetry in radioiodine therapy of thyroid cancer: procedures and results of a prospective international controlled study of ablation after rhTSH or hormone withdrawal. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  J. Valentin,et al.  Human Alimentary Tract Model for Radiological Protection , 2006 .

[19]  X. Xu,et al.  SPECIFIC ABSORBED FRACTIONS FOR INTERNAL PHOTON EMITTERS CALCULATED FOR A TOMOGRAPHIC MODEL OF A PREGNANT WOMAN , 2004, Health physics.

[20]  Sakae Kinase,et al.  Evaluation of specific absorbed fractions in voxel phantoms using Monte Carlo simulation. , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[21]  X. Xu,et al.  Calculations of specific absorbed fractions of the gastrointestinal tract using a realistic whole body tomographic model. , 2003, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[22]  M G Stabin,et al.  PHOTON SPECIFIC ABSORBED FRACTIONS CALCULATED IN THE TRUNK OF AN ADULT MALE VOXEL-BASED PHANTOM , 2002, Health physics.

[23]  M. Zankl,et al.  The adult male voxel model ”Golem” segmented from whole-body CT patient data , 2001, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[24]  M. Zankl,et al.  Impact on internal doses of photon SAFs derived with the GSF adult male voxel phantom. , 2001, Health physics.

[25]  M Zankl,et al.  Construction of a computed tomographic phantom for a Japanese male adult and dose calculation system , 2001, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[26]  M G Stabin,et al.  Absorbed fractions in a voxel-based phantom calculated with the MCNP-4B code. , 2000, Medical physics.

[27]  Terry Smith,et al.  Comparison of internal radiation doses estimated by MIRD and voxel techniques for a "family" of phantoms , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  A. Bozkurt,et al.  VIP-MAN: AN IMAGE-BASED WHOLE-BODY ADULT MALE MODEL CONSTRUCTED FROM COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE VISIBLE HUMAN PROJECT FOR MULTI-PARTICLE MONTE CARLO CALCULATIONS , 2000, Health physics.

[29]  D. G. Jones A Realistic Anthrompomorphic Phantom for Calculating Specific Absorbed Fractions of Energy Deposited from Internal Gamma Emitters , 1998 .

[30]  M. Zankl,et al.  Voxel Anthropomorphic Models as a Tool for Internal Dosimetry , 1998 .

[31]  K. Eckerman,et al.  Modifications to the ORNL Phantom Series in Simulation of the Responses of Thyroid Detectors , 1998 .

[32]  P B Hoffer,et al.  Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. , 1994, Medical physics.

[33]  K. F. Eckerman,et al.  Specific absorbed fractions of energy at various ages from internal photon sources: 6, Newborn , 1987 .

[34]  W. S. Snyder,et al.  Estimates of absorbed fractions for monoenergetic photon sources uniformly distributed in various organs of a heterogeneous phantom. , 1974, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[35]  J. Sempau,et al.  PENELOPE-2006: A Code System for Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport , 2009 .

[36]  Nina Petoussi-Henss,et al.  The GSF family of voxel phantoms , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  R. B. Sparks,et al.  Comparison of the effectiveness of some common animal data scaling techniques in estimating human radiation dose , 1999 .

[38]  E. Iso,et al.  Measurement Uncertainty and Probability: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement , 1995 .