Modeling and Characterization of the Uplink and Downlink Exposure in Wireless Networks

This paper deals with a new methodology to assess the exposure induced by both uplink and downlink of a cellular network using 3D electromagnetic simulations. It aims to analyze together the exposure induced by a personal device (uplink exposure) and that induced by a base station (downlink exposure). The study involved the major parameters contributing to variability and uncertainty in exposure assessment, such as the user’s posture, the type of wireless device, and the propagation environment. Our approach is relying basically on the modeling of the power radiated by the personal device and the ambient electric field, while taking into account the effects of human body shadowing and the propagation channel fluctuations. The exposure assessment as well as the human-wave interactions has been simulated using the finite difference in time domain method (FDTD). In uplink scenarios, four FDTD simulations were performed with a child model, used in two postures (sitting and standing) and in two usage scenarios (voice and data), which aimed to examine the exposure induced by a mobile phone and a tablet emitting, respectively, at 900 MHz and 1940 MHz. In the downlink scenario, a series of FDTD simulations of an exposure to a single plane wave and multiplane waves have been conducted, and an efficient metamodeling of the exposure using the Polynomial Chaos approach has been developed.

[1]  F. Anwar,et al.  Prediction of received signal power and propagation path loss in open/rural environments using modified Free-Space loss and Hata models , 2008, 2008 IEEE International RF and Microwave Conference.

[2]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[3]  P. Ravazzani,et al.  Electromagnetic field exposure assessment in Europe radiofrequency fields (10 MHz–6 GHz) , 2013, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[4]  A. Sibille Statistical Modeling of the Radio-Electric Properties of Wireless Terminals in their Environment , 2012, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[5]  Luc Martens,et al.  Statistical multi-path exposure method for assessing the whole-body SAR in a heterogeneous human body model in a realistic environment. , 2013, Bioelectromagnetics.

[6]  Luc Martens,et al.  The LEXNET Project: Wireless Networks and EMF: Paving the Way for Low-EMF Networks of the Future , 2014, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[7]  Xiao Dong Chen,et al.  Effects of the ground and the human body on the performance of a handset antenna , 2004 .

[8]  J.C. Batchelor,et al.  Body channel characterisation using dual band button antennas , 2009, 2009 3rd European Conference on Antennas and Propagation.

[9]  Joe Wiart,et al.  A surrogate model to assess the whole body SAR induced by multiple plane waves at 2.4 GHz , 2011, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[10]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Influence of electromagnetic polarization on the whole-body averaged SAR in children for plane-wave exposures , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Niels Kuster,et al.  The Virtual Family—development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Jun Wang,et al.  Uplink power control and interference coordination for heterogeneous network , 2012, 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC).

[13]  Alain Sibille Taking into account variability in wireless communication devices performance , 2015 .

[14]  P. Dimbylow,et al.  Effects of posture on FDTD calculations of specific absorption rate in a voxel model of the human body , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  A. Ahlbom Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .

[16]  C. Gabriel Compilation of the Dielectric Properties of Body Tissues at RF and Microwave Frequencies. , 1996 .

[17]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[18]  Joe Wiart,et al.  Analysis of the distribution of specific absorption rate induced by five plane waves with a fast and new method in Visible Human , 2011, 2011 XXXth URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium.

[19]  安藤 寛,et al.  Cross-Validation , 1952, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[20]  Michael A. Jensen Application of FDTD and RGFM to EM interaction with biological tissue: a comparison , 1998, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. 1998 Digest. Antennas: Gateways to the Global Network. Held in conjunction with: USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting (Cat. No.98CH36.

[21]  J. Wiart,et al.  Joint Minimization of Uplink and Downlink Whole-Body Exposure Dose in Indoor Wireless Networks , 2015, BioMed research international.

[22]  Luc Martens,et al.  Stochastic method for determination of the organ‐specific averaged SAR in realistic environments at 950 MHz , 2013, Bioelectromagnetics.

[23]  Wout Joseph,et al.  Combining near‐ and far‐field exposure for an organ‐specific and whole‐body RF‐EMF proxy for epidemiological research: A reference case , 2013, Bioelectromagnetics.

[24]  Joe Wiart,et al.  A Novel Methodology to Evaluate Uplink Exposure by Personal Devices in Wireless Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[25]  Joe Wiart,et al.  Duality Between Uplink Local and Downlink Whole-Body Exposures in Operating Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[26]  Xiongwen Zhao,et al.  WINNER II Channel Models Part I Channel Models , 2022 .

[27]  J. Wiart,et al.  Influence of Plane-Wave Incidence Angle on Whole Body and Local Exposure at 2100 MHz , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[28]  Maria A. Stuchly,et al.  Exposure of Human Models in the Near and Far Field - A Comparison , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.