Encoding and Decoding Touch Location in the Leech CNS

Spike times encode stimulus values in many sensory systems, but it is generally unknown whether such temporal variations are decoded (i.e., whether they influence downstream networks that control behavior). In the present study, we directly address this decoding problem by quantifying both sensory encoding and decoding in the leech. By mechanically stimulating the leech body wall while recording from mechanoreceptors, we show that pairs of leech sensory neurons with overlapping receptive fields encode touch location by their relative latencies, number of spikes, and instantaneous firing rates, with relative latency being the most accurate indicator of touch location. We then show that the relative latency and count are decoded by manipulating these variables in sensory neuron pairs while simultaneously monitoring the resulting behavior. Although both variables are important determinants of leech behavior, the decoding mechanisms are more sensitive to changes in relative spike count than changes in relative latency.

[1]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[2]  R. Johansson,et al.  First spikes in ensembles of human tactile afferents code complex spatial fingertip events , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  W. Kristan,et al.  A neuronal network for computing population vectors in the leech , 1998, Nature.

[4]  V. Torre,et al.  Highly Variable Spike Trains Underlie Reproducible Sensorimotor Responses in the Medicinal Leech , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  A. Parker,et al.  Sense and the single neuron: probing the physiology of perception. , 1998, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  Simon J. Thorpe,et al.  Spike arrival times: A highly efficient coding scheme for neural networks , 1990 .

[7]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[8]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  P. Carson,et al.  Enzymatic deficiency in primaquine-sensitive erythrocytes. , 1956, Science.

[10]  S. Lockery,et al.  Distributed processing of sensory information in the leech. II. Identification of interneurons contributing to the local bending reflex , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Diamond,et al.  Population coding in somatosensory cortex , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  J. Kaas,et al.  Magnification, receptive-field area, and "hypercolumn" size in areas 3b and 1 of somatosensory cortex in owl monkeys. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  H. K. Hartline,et al.  THE RESPONSE OF SINGLE OPTIC NERVE FIBERS OF THE VERTEBRATE EYE TO ILLUMINATION OF THE RETINA , 1938 .

[14]  V. Amassian Evoked single cortical unit activity in the somatic sensory areas. , 1953, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  Roger W. Cholewiak,et al.  The Perception of Tactile Distance: Influences of Body Site, Space, and Time , 1999 .

[16]  Eric E. Thomson,et al.  Location and intensity discrimination in the leech local bend response quantified using optic flow and principal components analysis. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  P. König,et al.  Correlated firing in sensory-motor systems , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  K O Johnson,et al.  Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  M. Diamond,et al.  Population Coding of Stimulus Location in Rat Somatosensory Cortex , 2001, Neuron.

[20]  V. Torre,et al.  Using Optical Flow to Characterize Sensory-Motor Interactions in a Segment of the Medicinal Leech , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  F. Mechler,et al.  Temporal coding of contrast in primary visual cortex: when, what, and why. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps , 2010 .

[23]  Guglielmo Foffani,et al.  Role of Spike Timing in the Forelimb Somatosensory Cortex of the Rat , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Behavioural and Mechanosensory Neurone Responses to Skin Stimulation in Leeches , 1982 .

[25]  B. Richmond,et al.  Latency: another potential code for feature binding in striate cortex. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  M W Oram,et al.  The temporal resolution of neural codes: does response latency have a unique role? , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[27]  R. Cholewiak space, and time , 1999 .

[28]  W. Kristan,et al.  Representation of touch location by a population of leech sensory neurons. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  F N JONES Space-time relationships in somesthetic localization. , 1956, Science.

[30]  J J Eggermont Azimuth coding in primary auditory cortex of the cat. II. Relative latency and interspike interval representation. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  William B. Kristan,et al.  Quantifying Stimulus Discriminability: A Comparison of Information Theory and Ideal Observer Analysis , 2005, Neural Computation.

[32]  Jones Fn,et al.  Space-Time Relationships in Somesthetic Localization , 1956 .

[33]  W. Kristan SENSORY AND MOTOR NEURONES RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCAL BENDING RESPONSE IN LEECHES , 1982 .

[34]  J E Lewis,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of a Directed Behavior in the Medicinal Leech: Implications for Organizing Motor Output , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Tactile resolution: peripheral neural mechanisms underlying the human capacity to determine positions of objects contacting the fingerpad , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[36]  G. Orban,et al.  Response latency of macaque area MT/V5 neurons and its relationship to stimulus parameters. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.