Flow-level stability of data networks with non-convex and time-varying rate regions

In this paper we characterize flow-level stochastic stability for networks with non-convex or time-varying rate regions underresource allocation based on utility maximization. Similar to prior works on flow-level stability, we consider exogenous data arrivals with finite workloads. However, to model many realistic situations, the rate region, which constrains the feasibility of resource allocation, may be either non-convex or time-varying. When the rate region is fixed but non-convex, we derive sufficient and necessary conditions for stability, which coincide when the set of allocated rate vectors has continuous contours. When the rate region is time-varying according to some stationary, ergodic process, we derive the precise stability region. In both cases,the size of the stability region depends on the resource allocation policy, in particular, on the fairness parameter in ∝-fair utility maximization. This is in sharp contrast with the substantial existing literature on stability under fixed and convex rate regions, in which the stability region coincides with the rate region for many utility-based resource allocation schemes, independently of the value of the fairness parameter. We further investigate the tradeoff between fairness and stability when rate region is non-convex or time-varying. Numerical examples of both wired and wireless networks are provided to illustrate the new stability regions and tradeoffs proved in the paper.

[1]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[2]  Wojciech Szpankowski,et al.  Stabilty Conditions for Some Multiqueue Distributed Systems: Buffered Random Access Systems , 1992 .

[3]  T. Bonald,et al.  Flow-level Stability of Utility-Based Allocations for Non-Convex Rate Regions , 2006, 2006 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[4]  Laurent Massoulié,et al.  A queueing analysis of max-min fairness, proportional fairness and balanced fairness , 2006, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[5]  Laurent Massoulié,et al.  Impact of fairness on Internet performance , 2001, SIGMETRICS '01.

[6]  Thomas Bonald,et al.  How mobility impacts the flow-level performance of wireless data networks , 2004 .

[7]  Jean C. Walrand,et al.  Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control , 2000, TNET.

[8]  P. Gupta,et al.  Optimal Throughput Allocation in General Random-Access Networks , 2006, 2006 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[9]  Matthew S. Grob,et al.  CDMA/HDR: a bandwidth-efficient high-speed wireless data service for nomadic users , 2000, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[10]  Sem C. Borst,et al.  Stability of Parallel Queueing Systems with Coupled Service Rates , 2006, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[11]  Edward W. Knightly,et al.  End-to-end performance and fairness in multihop wireless backhaul networks , 2004, MobiCom '04.

[12]  J. Dai.  On Positive Harris Recurrence of Multiclass Queueing Networks: A Unified Approach Via Fluid Limit Models , 1995 .

[13]  L. Massouli'e.  Structural properties of proportional fairness: Stability and insensitivity , 2007, 0707.4542.

[14]  Haiyun Luo,et al.  A new model for packet scheduling in multihop wireless networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[15]  Rayadurgam Srikant,et al.  Connection Level Stability Analysis of the Internet using the Sum of Squares Technique , 2004 .

[16]  Sem C. Borst,et al.  Wireless data performance in multi-cell scenarios , 2004, SIGMETRICS '04/Performance '04.

[17]  Christian Gromoll,et al.  Fluid limit of a network with fair bandwidth sharing and general document size distributions , 2004 .

[18]  Nicholas Bambos,et al.  Queueing Dynamics and Maximal Throughput Scheduling in Switched Processing Systems , 2003, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[19]  Wei Luo,et al.  Stability of N interacting queues in random-access systems , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[20]  Sem C. Borst,et al.  Capacity of Wireless Data Networks with Intra- and Inter-Cell Mobility , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[21]  Sem Borst,et al.  Capacity of wireless networks with intra- and inter-cell mobility , 2005 .

[22]  R. Srikant,et al.  On the Connection-Level Stability of Congestion-Controlled Communication Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[23]  Sem C. Borst,et al.  How mobility impacts the flow-level performance of wireless data systems , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[24]  A. Robert Calderbank,et al.  Layering as Optimization Decomposition: A Mathematical Theory of Network Architectures , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[25]  Xue-Ming Yuan,et al.  Stability of Data Networks: Stationary and Bursty Models , 2005, Oper. Res..

[26]  Koushik Kar,et al.  Cross-layer rate control for end-to-end proportional fairness in wireless networks with random access , 2005, MobiHoc '05.

[27]  W. Szpankowski.  Stability conditions for some distributed systems: buffered random access systems , 1994, Advances in Applied Probability.

[28]  Sem C. Borst,et al.  Stability of multi-class queueing systems with state-dependent service rates , 2006, valuetools '06.

[29]  Mung Chiang Devavrat Shah Ao Tang.  Stochastic Stability Under Network Utility Maximization : General File Size Distribution , 2006 .

[30]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  Stability and performance analysis of networks supporting elastic services , 2001, TNET.

[31]  Laurent Massoulié,et al.  Bandwidth sharing: objectives and algorithms , 2002, TNET.

[32]  Heng-Qing Ye,et al.  Stability of data networks under an optimization-based bandwidth allocation , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[33]  Ao Tang,et al.  Counter-intuitive throughput behaviors in networks under end-to-end control , 2006, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[34]  Alexandre Proutière,et al.  WLC07-3: Packet and Flow Level Performance of Wireless Multihop Data Networks , 2006, IEEE Globecom 2006.