Bimanual and unimanual length perception

From previous studies, it is unclear how bimanual length discrimination differs from unimanual length discrimination. To investigate the difference, we designed an experiment with four conditions. In the first two conditions, unimanual and bimanual discrimination thresholds are determined. In the third and fourth conditions, length is explored with the two index fingers like in the bimanual condition, but the reference is either internal, by clasping the hands together, or external, by grasping handles connected to the table. We find that thresholds for the unimanual condition (7.0 %) and the clasping condition (9.2 %) are both lower than for the bimanual condition (16 %) and the grasping handles condition (15 %). We conclude that when discriminating length unimanually and bimanually while clasping the hands together, the internal reference within the hand can be used and that explains the lower discrimination thresholds

[1]  Joseph Jastrow,et al.  THE PERCEPTION OF SPACE BY DISPARATE SENSES , 1886 .

[2]  William Noyes,et al.  THE PERCEPTION OF SPACE BY DISPARATE SENSES , 1887 .

[3]  H. S. Langfeld,et al.  The differential spatial limen for finger span. , 1917 .

[4]  H. F. Gaydos.  Sensitivity in the judgment of size by finger-span. , 1958, The American journal of psychology.

[5]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Finger span: ratio scale, category scale, and JND scale. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  A. Dietze.  Kinaesthetic Discrimination: The Difference Limen for Finger Span , 1961 .

[7]  Robert Teghtsoonian,et al.  Seen and felt length , 1965 .

[8]  H. Kuypers,et al.  Cerebral control of contralateral and ipsilateral arm, hand and finger movements in the split-brain rhesus monkey. , 1973, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  Location and Distance Estimates by Blind and Sighted Children , 1975, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  D. McCloskey,et al.  Detections of movements imposed on finger, elbow and shoulder joints. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  W. M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Manual discrimination and identification of length by the finger-span method , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS FOR THE DESIGN OF FORCE-REFLECTING HAPTIC INTERFACES , 1994 .

[13]  D J Bryant,et al.  Effect of Orientation in Haptic Reproduction of Line Length , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  Cognitive allocentric representations of visual space shape pointing errors , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  Roberta L Klatzky,et al.  Representing spatial location and layout from sparse kinesthetic contacts. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  A. Streri,et al.  Role of force cues in the haptic estimations of a virtual length , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Peter M. Vishton,et al.  Haptically Linked Dyads , 2006, Psychological science.

[18]  Gabriel Baud-Bovy,et al.  The haptic perception of spatial orientations , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Valentina Squeri,et al.  Size-Change Detection Thresholds of a Hand-Held Bar at Rest and during Movement , 2010, EuroHaptics.

[20]  A. Kappers,et al.  An Antisymmetric Psychometric Function on a Logarithmic Scale , 2011, Perception.

[21]  Astrid M. L. Kappers,et al.  Discrimination thresholds for haptic perception of volume, surface area, and weight , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[22]  André J. Szameitat,et al.  Neural Activation and Functional Connectivity during Motor Imagery of Bimanual Everyday Actions , 2012, PloS one.

[23]  Astrid M. L. Kappers,et al.  Bimanual Integration of Position and Curvature in Haptic Perception , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[24]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Two Distinct Ipsilateral Cortical Representations for Individuated Finger Movements , 2012, Cerebral cortex.