Designing the Article 6.4 mechanism

Different options of methodological approaches for setting emission baselines are currently under consideration in the international climate negotiations. This paper examines options for baseline approaches for the Article 6.4 mechanism, and draws lessons from how baselines have been used for other market mechanisms. The paper highlights that the different approaches being discussed offer advantages and disadvantages in the context of Article 6.4. Moreover, the paper points out that a one size- fits-all approach to setting baselines is unlikely to be appropriate for the new mechanism, given the variety of possible mitigation activity types and contexts. In particular, analysis of Clean Development Mechanism projects shows that a single baseline approach led to wide variations in baseline levels, implying the need to revise some methodologies if they are to be applied to Article 6.4. The paper also discusses benefits and implications for host Parties participating in the Article 6.4 mechanism, which may affect how Parties achieve their NDCs.

[1]  Karen Holm Olsen,et al.  Sustainable development benefits of clean development mechanism projects: A new methodology for sustainability assessment based on text analysis of the project design documents submitted for validation , 2008 .

[2]  J. Corfee-Morlot,et al.  Co-Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation Policies: Literature Review and New Results , 2009 .

[3]  Benchmarks to determine baselines for mitigation action under the Article 6.4 mechanism , 2019 .

[4]  John Psarras,et al.  Does the CDM offer sustainable development benefits or not? , 2013 .

[5]  Teng Fei,et al.  Definition of Business as Usual and Its Impacts on Assessment of Mitigation Efforts , 2012 .

[6]  Michael Lazarus,et al.  Discounting offsets: issues and options , 2011 .

[7]  R. Chung A CER discounting scheme could save climate change regime after 2012 , 2007 .

[8]  F. Preston,et al.  Making Concrete Change Innovation in Low-carbon Cement and Concrete , 2018 .

[9]  Markus Amann,et al.  Co-benefits of post-2012 global climate mitigation policies , 2013, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[10]  AN INITIAL VIEW ON METHODOLOGIES FOR EMISSION BASELINES: ELECTRICITY GENERATION CASE STUDY , 2002 .

[11]  Gregory Briner,et al.  Crossing the Threshold: Ambitious Baselines for the UNFCCC New Market-Based Mechanism , 2012 .

[12]  Sivan Kartha,et al.  Baseline recommendations for greenhouse gas mitigation projects in the electric power sector , 2004 .

[13]  PROJECTING EMISSIONS BASELINES FOR NATIONAL CLIMATE POLICY: OPTIONS FOR GUIDANCE TO IMPROVE TRANSPARENCY , 2012 .

[14]  N. Höhne,et al.  Beyond pure offsetting: Assessing options to generate Net-Mitigation-Effects in carbon market mechanisms , 2014 .

[15]  Can Wang,et al.  International carbon markets under the Paris Agreement: Basic form and development prospects , 2019, Advances in Climate Change Research.

[16]  Luca Lo Re,et al.  Markets negotiations under the Paris Agreement , 2019, OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers.