Discriminant function sexing of fragmentary and complete femora: standards for contemporary Croatia.

Determining sex is one of the first and most important steps in identifying decomposed corpses or skeletal remains. Previous studies have demonstrated that populations differ from each other in size and proportion and that these differences can affect metric assessment of sex. This paper establishes standards for determining sex from fragmentary and complete femurs in a modern Croatian population. The sample is composed of 195 femora (104 male and 91 female) from positively identified victims of the 1991 War in Croatia. Six discriminant functions were generated. one using seven variables, three using two variables, and two employing one variable. Results show that complete femora can be sexed with 94.4% accuracy. The same overall accuracy, with slight differences in male/female accuracy, was achieved using a combination of two variables defining the epiphyses, and with the variable maximum diameter of the femoral head.

[1]  M Graw,et al.  Determination of sex from femora. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[2]  C. A. King,et al.  Metric and comparative analysis of sexual dimorphism in the Thai femur. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  M. Šlaus.  Discriminant function sexing of fragmentary and complete femora from medieval sites in continental Croatia , 1997 .

[4]  M Y Işcan,et al.  Sex determination from the femur and tibia in South African whites. , 1997, Forensic science international.

[5]  G. Trancho,et al.  Sexual determination of the femur using discriminant functions. Analysis of a Spanish population of known sex and age. , 1997, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  M Y Işcan,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the Chinese femur. , 1995, Forensic science international.

[7]  G. Macho.  Is sexual dimorphism in the femur a "population specific phenomenon"? , 1990, Zeitschrift fur Morphologie und Anthropologie.

[8]  L. Wu,et al.  Sex determination of Chinese femur by discriminant function. , 1989, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  A. Tagaya.  Interpopulation Variation of Sex Differences , 1987 .

[10]  J Dittrick,et al.  Sex determination of prehistoric central California skeletal remains using discriminant analysis of the femur and humerus. , 1986, American journal of physical anthropology.

[11]  S. Maclaughlin,et al.  A simple univariate technique for determining sex from fragmentary femora: its application to a Scottish short cist population. , 1985, American journal of physical anthropology.

[12]  J V Taylor,et al.  Multiple discriminant function analysis of sex and race in the postcranial skeleton. , 1983, American journal of physical anthropology.

[13]  J V Taylor,et al.  Classification and misclassification in sexing the Black femur by discriminant function analysis. , 1982, American journal of physical anthropology.

[14]  J V Taylor,et al.  Determination of sex of white femora by discriminant function analysis: forensic science applications. , 1982, Journal of forensic sciences.

[15]  M. Kelley.  Sex determination with fragmented skeletal remains. , 1979, Journal of forensic sciences.

[16]  T. K. Black,et al.  A new method for assessing the sex of fragmentary skeletal remains: femoral shaft circumference. , 1978, American journal of physical anthropology.

[17]  S. Singh,et al.  Weight of the femur--a useful measurement for identification of sex. , 1974, Acta anatomica.

[18]  Tang Ck.  Some characteristics of the Chinese femur. , 1973 .

[19]  Fld. Steel,et al.  The sexing long bones with reference to the St. Bride's series of identified skeletons , 1962 .

[20]  M. Godycki.  Sur la certitude de dtermination du sexe d'aprs le fmur, le cubitus et l'humrus , 1957 .