Assessment for learning in English and mathematics: a comparison

Research in the area of assessment for learning (AfL) has largely focused on generic approaches and strategies, applicable to teaching and learning in all subject areas. In this article, we address the issue of subject-specific approaches. We examine two lessons, one English and one mathematics, and we discuss the form of assessment for learning in the context of these two subjects. English and mathematics are often thought of as contrasting disciplines, typifying the arts/sciences split in education and there are significant differences in the social norms and the structure of knowledge in each subject. This article undertakes a comparison of the lessons in order better to understand how these significant differences affect the realization of formative assessment in the classroom, and in doing so finds much common ground which might be the starting point for future dialogue between the disciplines.

[1]  B. Marshall.  English Teachers - The Unofficial Guide: Researching the Philosophies of English Teachers , 2000 .

[2]  Clare Lee,et al.  Assessment for Learning- putting it into practice , 2003 .

[3]  Mike Askew,et al.  Effective Teaching and Learning: Scaffolding Revisited , 1996 .

[4]  C. Kielkopf.  What is Mathematics Really , 2003 .

[5]  Miriam Gamoran Sherin,et al.  Perspective on M. Lampert’s “When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching” , 2004 .

[6]  N. Mercer,et al.  Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science , 2004 .

[7]  Randolph A. Philipp,et al.  Calculational and Conceptual Orientations in Teaching Mathematics , 1994 .

[8]  P. Black,et al.  'In praise of educational research': formative assessment , 2003 .

[9]  B. Marshall.  Goals or horizons—the conundrum of progression in English: or a possible way of understanding formative assessment in English , 2004 .

[10]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[11]  Barbara Jaworski,et al.  Research Practice into/influencing Mathematics Teaching and Learning Development: Towards a Theoretical framework based on co-learning partnerships , 2003 .

[12]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[13]  D. Sadler.  Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[14]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Making mathematics count : the report of Professor Adrian Smith's inquiry into post-14 mathematics education , 2004 .

[15]  K. M. Hart,et al.  Secondary School Children's Understanding of Mathematics. A Report of the Mathematics Component of the Concepts in Secondary Mathematics and Science Programme. , 1980 .

[16]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Children's Conceptual Structures for Multidigit Numbers and Methods of Multidigit Addition and Subtraction. , 1997 .

[17]  A. Sfard.  On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One , 1998 .

[18]  David C. Johnson,et al.  Children's Mathematical Frameworks 8-13: A Study of Classroom Teaching , 1989 .

[19]  Paul Cobb,et al.  An Analysis of Development of Sociomathematical Norms in One First-Grade Classroom , 2001 .

[20]  B. Greer.  Multiplication and division as models of situations. , 1992 .

[21]  G. Pólya.  Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning , 1958 .

[22]  Imre Lakatos,et al.  On the Uses of Rigorous Proof. (Book Reviews: Proofs and Refutations. The Logic of Mathematical Discovery) , 1977 .

[23]  I. Lakatos,et al.  Proofs and Refutations: Frontmatter , 1976 .

[24]  Jo Boaler,et al.  Exploring Situated Insights into Research and Learning. , 2000 .

[25]  Changes in control beliefs in Portuguese primary school pupils as a consequence of the employment of self-assessment strategies. , 1996, The British journal of educational psychology.

[26]  Joanna Oldham.  The Book of the Film: Enhancing Print Literacy at KS 3 , 1999 .

[27]  Juan Pascual-Leone,et al.  C. A view of cognition from a formalist's perspective , 1976 .

[28]  Raymond L. Debus,et al.  Effects of internally focused feedback and attributional feedback on enhancement of academic self-concept , 1991 .

[29]  J. Sinclair,et al.  Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils , 1975 .

[30]  You've Read the Book, Now Make the Film: Moving Image Media, Print Literacy and Narrative , 1999 .

[31]  Pertti J. Pelto,et al.  Ethnographic Research: A Guide to General Conduct , 1987 .

[32]  J. T. Dillon.  The Practice Of Questioning , 1990 .

[33]  Anthony E. Kelly,et al.  Theme Issue: The Role of Design in Educational Research , 2003 .

[34]  Tamara Bibby,et al.  Turning Our Attention from the What to the How: the National Numeracy Strategy , 2000 .

[35]  Lois W. Sayrs.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .