BAYESIAN AND FREQUENTIST APPROACHES FOR FITTING THE GAMMA-TIME-DEPENDENT MODEL TO DESCRIBE NEUTRAL DETERGENT FIBER DEGRADATION

 ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was evaluate and compare the efficiency of Bayesian and frequentist approach to describe the rumen degradation of NDF. Simulated data was composed by four scenarios: regular restriction in the number of incubation times, random loss of incubation times, loss of specific parts of degradation curves, variation in the precision of the incubations procedures. Two real datasets was used, these real data encompassed the evaluation of NDF degradation of a tropical grass (Brachiaria decumbes). The model was fitted according their characteristics approach and compared by plots and assessors. The Bayesian and frequentist approach presented reliable estimates of degradation parameters for the majority of the data tested. Therefore, in specific cases with short random records number, the Bayesian approach showed greater bias of the estimates of incubation residue and estimates of degradation rate without a biological coherence of the parameters, compared to frequentist inference. In another words, the Bayesian approach fitted with prior diffuse, presented less flexible. Nevertheless, it is emphasized the importance of the background information before the modeling, mainly for the Bayesian approach, in order to define proper prior distributions. Future thorough studies about the influence of non-informative prior for the parameters are necessary.

[1]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[2]  Philip Heidelberger,et al.  Simulation Run Length Control in the Presence of an Initial Transient , 1983, Oper. Res..

[3]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[4]  Bayesian analysis for comparison of nonlinear regression model parameters: an application to ruminal degradability data , 2010 .

[5]  William J. Browne,et al.  Bayesian and likelihood-based methods in multilevel modeling 1 A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models , 2006 .

[6]  E. Detmann,et al.  Evaluation of ruminal degradation profiles of forages using bags made from different textiles , 2011 .

[7]  Andrew B. Lawson,et al.  Bayesian Biostatistics: Lesaffre/Bayesian Biostatistics , 2012 .

[8]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  G. B. Mourão,et al.  Bayesian analysis of autoregressive panel data model: application in genetic evaluation of beef cattle , 2011 .

[10]  J. Matis,et al.  Methodology for Estimating Digestion and Passage Kinetics of Forages , 2015 .

[11]  S. E. Hills,et al.  Illustration of Bayesian Inference in Normal Data Models Using Gibbs Sampling , 1990 .

[12]  F. Silva,et al.  Bayesian inference of mixed models in quantitative genetics of crop species , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[13]  Brian J. Smith,et al.  boa: An R Package for MCMC Output Convergence Assessment and Posterior Inference , 2007 .

[14]  A. Gelman Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper) , 2004 .

[15]  D. Mertens,et al.  2 Rate and Extent of Digestion , 1993 .

[16]  G. Broderick,et al.  Quantifying ruminal digestion of organic matter and neutral detergent fiber using the omasal sampling technique in cattle--a meta-analysis. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  James O. Berger,et al.  The interplay of Bayesian and frequentist analysis , 2004 .

[18]  P. Cecon,et al.  Estimação de parâmetros da cinética de trânsito de partículas em bovinos sob pastejo por diferentes seqüências amostrais , 2001 .

[19]  B. Rannala,et al.  The Bayesian revolution in genetics , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.