Study of the Lateral Boundary Condition Temporal Resolution Problem and a Proposed Solution by Means of Boundary Error Restarts

To properly utilize coupled limited-area models (LAMs), the time scales of the cross-boundary fluxes in the available lateral boundary data must be assessed. In current operational practice, the update frequencies of these data are usually determined by common sense guesswork and by technical constraints. This paper quantifies the required temporal resolution of the lateral boundary conditions. For a mesoscale LAM it is concluded that in standard forecast cases, coupling updates of about 3 h are sufficient. However, in rare cases of severe storms, this can lead to errors in the coupling data of about 10 hPa. To avoid such errors, it is found that one should update the coupling fields with the period given by the time step of the model that provides the coupling data. However, in most existing operational applications this is not feasible. For those cases, it is shown that the forecast can be substantially improved by restarting the model run at a forecast range when the storm has entered the domain. The proper restart time can be detected in an operational suite by an existing strategy of monitoring the coupling update frequency. Additionally, it is argued that the forecast should then be initialized by a scale-selective digital filter.

[1]  Piet Termonia.  Monitoring and Improving the Temporal Interpolation of Lateral-Boundary Coupling Data for Limited-Area Models , 2003 .

[2]  Peter Lynch,et al.  The Dolph-Chebyshev Window: A Simple Optimal Filter , 1997 .

[3]  Jan Erik Haugen,et al.  A Spectral Limited-Area Model Formulation with Time-dependent Boundary Conditions Applied to the Shallow-Water Equations , 1993 .

[4]  Heini Wernli,et al.  Dynamical aspects of the life cycle of the winter storm ‘Lothar’ (24–26 December 1999) , 2002 .

[5]  Piet Termonia.  Scale-Selective Digital-Filtering Initialization , 2008 .

[6]  R. Treadon,et al.  A Tutorial on Lateral Boundary Conditions as a Basic and Potentially Serious Limitation to Regional Numerical Weather Prediction , 1997 .

[7]  A. McDonald.  Transparent lateral boundary conditions for baroclinic waves II. Introducing potential vorticity waves , 2006 .

[8]  H. Storch,et al.  A Spectral Nudging Technique for Dynamical Downscaling Purposes , 2000 .

[9]  A. Mcdonald,et al.  Transparent lateral boundary conditions for baroclinic waves: a study of two elementary systems of equations , 2005 .

[10]  Ronald M. Errico,et al.  Spectra Computed from a Limited Area Grid , 1985 .

[11]  Pierre Bénard,et al.  Well-Posed Lateral Boundary Conditions for Spectral Semi-Implicit Semi-Lagrangian Schemes: Tests in a One-Dimensional Model , 2009 .

[12]  F. Chomé,et al.  One-way nested regional climate simulations and domain size , 2005 .

[13]  H. Davies,et al.  A lateral boundary formulation for multi-level prediction models. [numerical weather forecasting , 1976 .

[14]  Piet Termonia,et al.  Externalizing the lateral boundary conditions from the dynamic core in semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian models , 2008 .

[15]  Piet Termonia,et al.  Monitoring the Coupling-Update Frequency of a Limited-Area Model by Means of a Recursive Digital Filter , 2004 .

[16]  David P. Baumhefner,et al.  Evaluation of lateral boundary errors in a limited-domain model , 1982 .

[17]  John D. Horel,et al.  Sensitivity of a Spectrally Filtered and Nudged Limited-Area Model to Outer Model Options , 1996 .

[18]  Peter Lynch,et al.  Initialization of the HIRLAM Model Using a Digital Filter , 1992 .