SHAPE BASED CLASSIFICATION OF SEISMIC BUILDING STRUCTURAL TYPES

Abstract. This paper investigates automatic prediction of seismic building structural types described by the Global Earthquake Model (GEM) taxonomy, by combining remote sensing, cadastral and inspection data in a supervised machine learning approach. Our focus lies on the extraction of detailed geometric information from a point cloud gained by aerial laser scanning. To describe the geometric shape of a building we apply Shape-DNA, a spectral shape descriptor based on the eigenvalues of the Laplace-Beltrami operator. In a first experiment on synthetically generated building stock we succeed in predicting the roof type of different buildings with accuracies above 80 %, only relying on the Shape-DNA. The roof type of a building thereby serves as an example of a relevant feature for predicting GEM attributes, which cannot easily be identified and described by using traditional methods for shape analysis of buildings. Further research is necessary in order to explore the usability of Shape-DNA on real building data. In a second experiment we use real-world data of buildings located in the Groningen region in the Netherlands. Here we can automatically predict six GEM attributes, such as the type of lateral load resisting system, with accuracies above 75 % only by taking a buildings footprint area and year of construction into account.

[1]  Daniela Giorgi,et al.  Discrete Laplace-Beltrami operators for shape analysis and segmentation , 2009, Comput. Graph..

[2]  Fabio Remondino,et al.  A REVIEW OFPOINT CLOUDS SEGMENTATION AND CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS , 2017 .

[3]  Norbert Haala,et al.  An update on automatic 3D building reconstruction , 2010 .

[4]  Martha Elizabeth Shenton,et al.  Laplace-Beltrami eigenvalues and topological features of eigenfunctions for statistical shape analysis , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[5]  Pooya Sarabandi Development of algorithms for building inventory compilation through remote sensing and statistical inferencing , 2007 .

[6]  Hannes Taubenböck,et al.  Estimation of seismic building structural types using multi-sensor remote sensing and machine learning techniques , 2015 .

[7]  Martha Elizabeth Shenton,et al.  Global Medical Shape Analysis Using the Laplace-Beltrami Spectrum , 2007, MICCAI.

[8]  M. Pittore,et al.  Toward a rapid probabilistic seismic vulnerability assessment using satellite and ground-based remote sensing , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[9]  Massimiliano Pittore,et al.  Estimating building inventory for rapid seismic vulnerability assessment: Towards an integrated approach based on multi-source imaging , 2012 .

[10]  Niklas Peinecke,et al.  Laplace-Beltrami spectra as 'Shape-DNA' of surfaces and solids , 2006, Comput. Aided Des..

[11]  J. A. de Waal,et al.  A guideline for assessing seismic risk induced by gas extraction in the Netherlands , 2015 .

[12]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  Christian Geiß Seismic vulnerability assessment of built environments with remote sensing , 2015 .

[14]  Reynaldo J. Arteaga,et al.  Laplace-Beltrami spectra as ‘Shape-DNA’ of surfaces using the closest point method , 2014 .

[15]  Paolo Gamba,et al.  Vulnerability study on a large industrial area using satellite remotely sensed images , 2011 .

[16]  Pierre Vandergheynst,et al.  Geodesic Convolutional Neural Networks on Riemannian Manifolds , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW).

[17]  Zeyun Yu,et al.  A compact shape descriptor for triangular surface meshes , 2014, Comput. Aided Des..

[18]  Heinrich Müller,et al.  Improved Laplacian Smoothing of Noisy Surface Meshes , 1999, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[19]  Paul Suetens,et al.  SHREC '11 Track: Shape Retrieval on Non-rigid 3D Watertight Meshes , 2011, 3DOR@Eurographics.

[20]  L. L. Porta,et al.  Active and passive remote sensing for supporting the evaluation of the urban seismic vulnerability , 2010 .

[21]  Charles Scawthorn,et al.  GEM Building Taxonomy (Version 2.0) , 2013 .