Decentration and tilt: silicone multifocal versus acrylic soft intraocular lenses

Purpose: To compare differences in decentration and tilt between a silicone multifocal and an acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) by evaluating postoperative changes. Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. Methods: Forty eyes of 20 patients with IOL implantation were randomized into 2 groups according to IOL type: 3‐piece silicone multifocal IOL or 3‐piece acrylic IOL. All lenses were implanted in the capsular bag through a clear corneal incision after continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis and phacoemulsification. The amount of the decentration and the degree of the tilt of each IOL were measured using the EAS‐1000 anterior eye segment analysis system 1 day and 1 and 2 months after surgery. Results: No significant difference in decentration and tilt was found among the 3 follow‐ups or between lens types. Conclusion: Neither IOL decentration nor tilt showed significant progression up to 2 months in eyes with a silicone multifocal or acrylic IOL when the IOLs were placed properly in the capsular bag. The amount of decentration and tilt was similar between lens types.

[1]  S Ohmi,et al.  Decentration associated with asymmetric capsular shrinkage and intraocular lens size , 1993, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  D. Apple,et al.  An experimental study comparing various anterior capsulectomy techniques. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  Charles J. Koester,et al.  Measurement of intraocular lens decentration and tilt in vivo , 1988, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  D L Guyton,et al.  Rapid determination of intraocular lens tilt and decentration through the undilated pupil. , 1990, Ophthalmology.

[5]  D. Apple,et al.  Prospective experimental study of factors related to posterior chamber intraocular lens decentration , 1992, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  L. Woung,et al.  Position of poly(methyl methacrylate) and silicone intraocular lenses after phacoemulsificaxion , 1998, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  H. Hayashi,et al.  Comparison of decentration and tilt between one piece and three piece polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lenses , 1998, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  A. Caballero,et al.  Long‐term decentration of intraocular lenses implanted with envelope capsulotomy and continuous curvilinear capsulotomy: A comparative study , 1995, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  A. E. Maumenee,et al.  Intraocular lenses. Experience at the Wilmer Institute. , 1982, Ophthalmology.

[10]  S. O. Hansen,et al.  Posterior capsular opacification and intraocular lens decentration Part II: Experimental findings on a prototype circular intraocular lens design , 1988, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  F. Mutlu,et al.  The Role of Capsulotomy and Intraocular Lens Type on Tilt and Decentration of Polymethylmethacrylate and Foldable Acrylic Lenses , 1998, Ophthalmologica.

[12]  Y. Emori,et al.  Measurement of postoperative intraocular lens tilting and decentration using Scheimpflug images , 1989, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.