Multitemporal soil moisture monitoring by use of optical remote sensing data in a dike relocation area

The nature restoration project ‘Lenzener Elbtalaue’, realised from 2002 to 2011 at the river Elbe, included the first large scale dike relocation in Germany (420 ha). Its aim was to initiate the development of endangered natural wetland habitats and processes, accompanied by greater biodiversity in the former grassland dominated area. The monitoring of spatial and temporal variations of soil moisture in this dike relocation area is therefore particularly important for estimating the restoration success. The topsoil moisture monitoring from 1990 to 2017 is based on the Soil Moisture Index (SMI)1 derived with the triangle method2 by use of optical remotely sensed data: land surface temperature and Normalized Differnce Vegetation Index are calculated from Landsat 4/5/7/8 data and atmospheric corrected by use of MODIS data. Spatial and temporal soil moisture variations in the restored area of the dike relocation are compared to the agricultural and pasture area behind the new dike. Ground truth data in the dike relocation area was obtained from field measurements in October 2017 with a FDR device. Additionally, data from a TERENO soil moisture sensor network (SoilNet) and mobile cosmic ray neutron sensing (CRNS) rover measurements are compared to the results of the triangle method for a region in the Harz Mountains (Germany). The SMI time series illustrates, that the dike relocation area has become significantly wetter between 1990 and 2017, due to restructuring measurements. Whereas the SMI of the dike hinterland reflects constant and drier conditions. An influence of climate is unlikely. However, validation of the dimensionless index with ground truth measurements is very difficult, mostly due to large differences in scale.

[1]  Guoqing Zhou,et al.  Estimation of Soil Moisture from Optical and Thermal Remote Sensing: A Review , 2016, Sensors.

[2]  Jan Vanderborght,et al.  On the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil moisture at the field scale , 2014 .

[3]  A. Musolff,et al.  Principal Component Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Pattern of Soil Moisture and Apparent Electrical Conductivity , 2017 .

[4]  Miquel Ninyerola,et al.  Revision of the Single-Channel Algorithm for Land Surface Temperature Retrieval From Landsat Thermal-Infrared Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Juan C. Jiménez-Muñoz,et al.  Land Surface Temperature Retrieval Methods From Landsat-8 Thermal Infrared Sensor Data , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  Martin Kappas,et al.  An integrated methodology for soil moisture analysis using multispectral data in Mongolia , 2017, Geo spatial Inf. Sci..

[7]  Vahid Moosavi,et al.  Estimation of spatially enhanced soil moisture combining remote sensing and artificial intelligence approaches , 2016 .

[8]  Marek G Zreda,et al.  Quantifying mesoscale soil moisture with the cosmic-ray rover , 2013 .

[9]  Michael H. Cosh,et al.  Calibration and Validation of the COSMOS Rover for Surface Soil Moisture Measurement , 2014 .

[10]  Peter Dietrich,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Hillslope‐Scale Soil Moisture Patterns: Characteristic States and Transition Mechanisms , 2015 .

[11]  J. C. Price Using spatial context in satellite data to infer regional scale evapotranspiration , 1990 .

[12]  R. Rosolem,et al.  Cosmic‐ray Neutron Rover Surveys of Field Soil Moisture and the Influence of Roads , 2017, Water Resources Research.

[13]  Zhaodong Feng,et al.  Assessment of soil moisture using Landsat ETM+ temperature/vegetation index in semiarid environment , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.