Minimum risk distance measure for object recognition

The optimal distance measure for a given discrimination task under the nearest neighbor framework has been shown to be the likelihood that a pair of measurements have different class labels [S. Mahamud et al., (2002)]. For implementation and efficiency considerations, the optimal distance measure was approximated by combining more elementary distance measures defined on simple feature spaces. We address two important issues that arise in practice for such an approach: (a) What form should the elementary distance measure in each feature space take? We motivate the need to use the optimal distance measure in simple feature spaces as the elementary distance measures; such distance measures have the desirable property that they are invariant to distance-respecting transformations, (b) How do we combine the elementary distance measures ? We present the precise statistical assumptions under which a linear logistic model holds exactly. We benchmark our model with three other methods on a challenging face discrimination task and show that our approach is competitive with the state of the art.

[1]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[2]  Hiroshi Murase,et al.  Detection of 3D objects in cluttered scenes using hierarchical eigenspace , 1997, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[3]  R. Chellappa,et al.  Subspace Linear Discriminant Analysis for Face Recognition , 1999 .

[4]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[5]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[6]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Beyond eigenfaces: probabilistic matching for face recognition , 1998, Proceedings Third IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition.

[8]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[9]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[10]  Xiaoou Tang,et al.  Dual-space linear discriminant analysis for face recognition , 2004, CVPR 2004.

[11]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  The optimal distance measure for nearest neighbor classification , 1981, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Hyeonjoon Moon,et al.  The FERET Evaluation Methodology for Face-Recognition Algorithms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Francesco Ricci,et al.  A Minimum Risk Metric for Nearest Neighbor Classification , 1999, ICML.

[14]  P. Jonathon Phillips,et al.  Support Vector Machines Applied to Face Recognition , 1998, NIPS.

[15]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[16]  Martial Hebert,et al.  The optimal distance measure for object detection , 2003, 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings..

[17]  Bruno O. Shubert,et al.  Random variables and stochastic processes , 1979 .

[18]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[19]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[20]  Martial Hebert, Co-chair , 2002 .