Mixed valuation methods: a combined AHP-GP procedure for individual and group multicriteria agricultural valuation

This paper introduces a new assessment method classification, in which a third procedure, mixed valuation, is jointly included with the traditional economic and non-economic methodologies. The paper considers a case of multiple actors (from a previous work by the same authors—Aznar et al. (Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 25(2):389–409, 2007), in which a new technique for multicriteria agriculture valuation (MAVAM) was proposed. The method is specifically designed for situations in which scarce information about the elements being compared (quantified or not) is available. It works in individual and group decision making contexts and attempts to both obtain and incorporate the objective information associated with the tangible aspects of the problem and the subjective knowledge associated with the human factor into the valuation process. It combines two of the most extended multicriteria decision making techniques: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Goal Programming (GP). The first of these enables tangible and intangible information stemming from known elements to be collected by using pairwise comparisons; the second allows the scarce information available and the personal approach to the valuation to be included in the valuation process. The proposed methodology is illustrated by means of its application to a case of individual and group valuation of an agricultural asset in the La Ribera district, Valencia (Spain).

[1]  Marc J. Schniederjans,et al.  Using Goal Programming and the analytic hierarchy process in house selection , 1995 .

[2]  T. Saaty,et al.  Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgements , 1983 .

[3]  R. D. Groot,et al.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services , 2002 .

[4]  S. French Value‐focused thinking: A path to creative decision making, Keeney, R. L., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992, ISBN 0‐674‐93197‐1 , 1993 .

[5]  H. Pastijn Handbook of critical issues in goal programming: Carlos Romero Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1990, xi + 124 pages, £25.00, ISBN 008 0406610 , 1992 .

[6]  Yannis Siskos,et al.  A Multiple Criteria Analysis Model For Real Estate Evaluation , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[7]  J. G. Hunt,et al.  L1 ESTIMATION IN SMALL SAMPLES WITH LAPLACE ERROR DISTRIBUTIONS , 1974 .

[8]  Mustafa Yurdakul,et al.  Selection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies using a combined analytic hierarchy process and goal programming model , 2004 .

[9]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[10]  Chian-Son Yu,et al.  A GP-AHP method for solving group decision-making fuzzy AHP problems , 2002, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  Bojan Srdjevic,et al.  Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  MavrotasG.,et al.  Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems , 1995 .

[13]  Jerónimo Aznar Bellver,et al.  Valoración Agraria multicriterio en un entorno con escasa información/Multicriteria Agricultural Valuation in an Environment with scarce information , 2007 .

[14]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[15]  Alexander Schrijver,et al.  Handbook of Critical Issues in Goal Programming , 1992 .

[16]  Saul I. Gass,et al.  A note on synthesizing group decisions , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  Z. Xu,et al.  On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Optimal Estimation of Executive Compensation by Linear Programming , 1955 .

[19]  M. T. Escobar,et al.  Aggregation of Individual Preference Structures in Ahp-Group Decision Making , 2007 .

[20]  R. Ramanathan,et al.  Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages , 1994 .

[21]  Jerónimo Aznar Bellver,et al.  Métodos de valoración basados en la programación por metas: modelo de valoración restringida , 2004 .

[22]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Aggregation of preferences in an environmental economics context: a goal-programming approach , 2002 .

[23]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorization procedure , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  T. Saaty,et al.  Group decision-making: Head-count versus intensity of preference , 2007 .

[25]  Daryl E. Carlson,et al.  A simple approximation of the sampling distribution of least absolute residuals regression estimates , 1977 .

[26]  Jerónimo Aznar-Bellver,et al.  Estimating Regression Parameters with Imprecise Input Data in an Appraisal Context , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Jacinto González-Pachón,et al.  Aggregation of partial ordinal rankings: an interval goal programming approach , 2001, Comput. Oper. Res..

[28]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) , 2004 .

[29]  José María Moreno Jiménez Los métodos estadísticos y el nuevo método científico , 2003 .

[30]  Saul I. Gass Erratum: A Process for Determining Priorities and Weights for Large-Scale Linear Goal Programmes , 1986 .

[31]  Masood A. Badri,et al.  A combined AHP}GP model for qualitycontrol sy stems , 2001 .

[32]  Jerónimo Aznar-Bellver,et al.  Modelling aesthetic variables in the valuation of paintings: an interval goal programming approach , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[33]  Kirti Peniwati,et al.  Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  G. Mavrotas,et al.  Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[35]  Kun Jai Lee,et al.  Selection of an Optimal Nuclear Fuel Cycle Scenario by Goal Programming and the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1999 .