Multiline Bus Bunching Control via Vehicle Substitution

Abstract Traditional bus bunching control methods (e.g., adding slack to schedules, adapting cruising speed), in one way or another, trade commercial speed for better system stability and, as a result, may impose the burden of additional travel time on passengers. Recently, a dynamic bus substitution strategy, where standby buses are dispatched to take over service from late/early buses, was proposed as an attempt to enhance system reliability without sacrificing too much passenger experience. This paper further studies this substitution strategy in the context of multiple bus lines under either time-independent or time-varying settings. In the latter scenario, the fleet of standby buses can be dynamically utilized to save on opportunity costs. We model the agency’s substitution decisions and retired bus repositioning decisions as a stochastic dynamic program so as to obtain the optimal policy that minimizes the system-wide costs. Numerical results show that the dynamic substitution strategy can benefit from the “economies of scale” by pooling the standby fleet across lines, and there are also benefits from dynamic fleet management when transit demand varies over time. Numerical examples are presented to illustrate the applicability and advantage of the proposed strategy. The substitution strategy not only holds the promise to outperform traditional holding methods in terms of reducing passenger costs, they also can be used to complement other methods to better control very unstable systems.

[1]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Dynamic bus holding strategies for schedule reliability: Optimal linear control and performance analysis , 2011 .

[2]  Laura Torres,et al.  Bus control strategies in corridors with signalized intersections , 2016 .

[3]  David Bernstein,et al.  The Holding Problem with Real - Time Information Available , 2001, Transp. Sci..

[4]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  OPTIMAL DESIGN OF TRANSIT SHORT-TURN TRIPS , 1989 .

[5]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  Dynamic bus substitution strategy for bunching intervention , 2018, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[6]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Dynamic control of complex transit systems , 2015 .

[7]  Ricardo Giesen,et al.  How much can holding and/or limiting boarding improve transit performance? , 2012 .

[8]  Kari Watkins,et al.  A real-time bus dispatching policy to minimize passenger wait on a high frequency route , 2015 .

[9]  Mark D. Abkowitz,et al.  IMPLEMENTING HEADWAY-BASED RELIABILITY CONTROL ON TRANSIT ROUTES , 1990 .

[10]  Omar J. Ibarra-Rojas,et al.  Planning, operation, and control of bus transport systems: A literature review , 2015 .

[11]  R B Potts,et al.  Maintaining a bus schedule , 1964 .

[12]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Fundamentals of Transportation and Traffic Operations , 1997 .

[13]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  “Approximate dynamic programming: Solving the curses of dimensionality” by Warren B. Powell , 2007, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[14]  Qing Liu,et al.  Real-Time Optimization Model for Dynamic Scheduling of Transit Operations , 2003 .

[15]  G. F. Newell Control of Pairing of Vehicles on a Public Transportation Route, Two Vehicles, One Control Point , 1974 .

[16]  Ricardo Giesen,et al.  Analysis of real-time control strategies in a corridor with multiple bus services , 2015 .

[17]  Ronghui Liu,et al.  Modelling bus bunching and holding control with vehicle overtaking and distributed passenger boarding behaviour , 2017 .

[18]  Mark D. Hickman,et al.  The Real–Time Stop–Skipping Problem , 2005, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[19]  Ricardo Giesen,et al.  Real-Time Control of Buses in a Transit Corridor Based on Vehicle Holding and Boarding Limits , 2009 .

[20]  Carlos F Daganzo,et al.  Public Transportation Systems , 2019 .

[21]  Donald Ervin Knuth,et al.  The Art of Computer Programming , 1968 .

[22]  G. F. Newell,et al.  Control Strategies for an Idealized Public Transportation System , 1972 .

[23]  Zhiyuan Liu,et al.  Bus stop-skipping scheme with random travel time , 2013 .

[24]  Alexander Skabardonis,et al.  A DYNAMIC MODEL FOR ADAPTIVE BUS SIGNAL PRIORITY , 2003 .

[25]  Nigel H. M. Wilson,et al.  Real-time holding control for high-frequency transit with dynamics , 2016 .

[26]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Reducing bunching with bus-to-bus cooperation , 2011 .

[27]  Amer Shalaby,et al.  AUTOMATED TRANSIT HEADWAY CONTROL VIA ADAPTIVE SIGNAL PRIORITY , 2004 .

[28]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  A headway-based approach to eliminate bus bunching: Systematic analysis and comparisons , 2009 .

[29]  Donald D. Eisenstein,et al.  A self-coördinating bus route to resist bus bunching , 2012 .