Correlation of Radiographic Parameters and Clinical Symptoms in Adult Scoliosis

Study Design. This study is a retrospective review of the initial enrollment data from a prospective multicentered study of adult spinal deformity. Objectives. The purpose of this study is to correlate radiographic measures of deformity with patient-based outcome measures in adult scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. Prior studies of adult scoliosis have attempted to correlate radiographic appearance and clinical symptoms, but it has proven difficult to predict health status based on radiographic measures of deformity alone. The ability to correlate radiographic measures of deformity with symptoms would be useful for decision-making and surgical planning. Methods. The study correlates radiographic measures of deformity with scores on the Short Form-12, Scoliosis Research Society-29, and Oswestry profiles. Radiographic evaluation was performed according to an established positioning protocol for anteroposterior and lateral 36-inch standing radiographs. Radiographic parameters studied were curve type, curve location, curve magnitude, coronal balance, sagittal balance, apical rotation, and rotatory subluxation. Results. The 298 patients studied include 172 with no prior surgery and 126 who had undergone prior spine fusion. Positive sagittal balance was the most reliable predictor of clinical symptoms in both patient groups. Thoracolumbar and lumbar curves generated less favorable scores than thoracic curves in both patient groups. Significant coronal imbalance of greater than 4 cm was associated with deterioration in pain and function scores for unoperated patients but not in patients with previous surgery. Conclusions. This study suggests that restoration of a more normal sagittal balance is the critical goal for any reconstructive spine surgery. The study suggests that magnitude of coronal deformity and extent of coronal correction are less critical parameters.

[1]  Courtney W. Brown,et al.  Is There an Optimal Patient Stance for Obtaining a Lateral 36” Radiograph?: A Critical Comparison of Three Techniques , 2005, Spine.

[2]  S. Weinstein,et al.  Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis: a 50-year natural history study. , 2003, JAMA.

[3]  K. Wood,et al.  Sagittal Profile of the Elderly , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[4]  V. Deviren,et al.  Predictors of Flexibility and Pain Patterns in Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2002, Spine.

[5]  V. Deviren,et al.  9:46 Validation of the modified Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument (SRS-22) for adult deformity , 2002 .

[6]  V. Deviren,et al.  Outcome and Complications of Long Fusions to the Sacrum in Adult Spine Deformity: Luque-Galveston, Combined Iliac and Sacral Screws, and Sacral Fixation , 2002, Spine.

[7]  F. Schwab,et al.  Adult Scoliosis: A Quantitative Radiographic and Clinical Analysis , 2002, Spine.

[8]  R. Betz,et al.  Do Radiographic Parameters Correlate With Clinical Outcomes in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? , 2000, Spine.

[9]  S. Weinstein Bristol-Myers Squibb/Zimmer Award for Distinguished Achievement in Orthopaedic Research: Long-Term Follow-up of Pediatric Orthopaedic Conditions Natural History and Outcomes of Treatment*† , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  L. Lenke,et al.  Comparison of Standing Sagittal Spinal Alignment in Asymptomatic Adolescents and Adults , 1998, Spine.

[11]  S. Weinstein,et al.  Long-term psychosocial characteristics of patients treated for idiopathic scoliosis. , 1997, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[12]  Kevin W. McEnery,et al.  An Analysis of Sagittal Spinal Alignment in 100 Asymptomatic Middle and Older Aged Volunteers , 1995, Spine.

[13]  R. Jackson,et al.  Coronal and Sagittal Plane Spinal Deformities Correlating with Back Pain and Pulmonary Function in Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1989, Spine.

[14]  M Bernhardt,et al.  Segmental Analysis of the Sagittal Plane Alignment of the Normal Thoracic and Lumbar Spines and Thoracolumbar Junction , 1989, Spine.

[15]  F TRAVAGLINI,et al.  Natural History of Untreated Idiopathic Scoliosis After Skeletal Maturity , 1986, Spine.

[16]  R. Jackson,et al.  Incidence and Severity of Back Pain in Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1983, Spine.

[17]  A. Alter Idiopathic scoliosis: Long term follow-up and prognosis in untreated patients , 1982 .

[18]  S. Weinstein,et al.  Idiopathic scoliosis: long-term follow-up and prognosis in untreated patients. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  M. Pitt,et al.  Thoracic kyphosis: range in normal subjects. , 1980, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  D. Drummond,et al.  Untreated scoliosis in the adult. , 1978, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  J. Kostuik,et al.  Scoliosis surgery in adults. , 1973, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  I. Ponseti,et al.  Long-term follow-up of patients with idiopathic scoliosis not treated surgically. , 1969, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  Christopher Dewdney The Natural History , 2002 .

[24]  A. Danielsson Outcome of treatment for scoliosis. A multi-disciplinary follow-up at least 20 years after surgery or brace treatment in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with comparison to a matching control group , 2000 .

[25]  A. Nachemson,et al.  A long term follow-up study of non-treated scoliosis. , 1968, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[26]  U. Nilsonne,et al.  Long-term prognosis in idiopathic scoliosis. , 1968, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.