Preclinical Performance Evaluation of Percutaneous Glucose Biosensors

The utility of continuous glucose monitoring devices remains limited by an obstinate foreign body response (FBR) that degrades the analytical performance of the in vivo sensor. A number of novel materials that resist or delay the FBR have been proposed as outer, tissue-contacting glucose sensor membranes as a strategy to improve sensor accuracy. Traditionally, researchers have examined the ability of a material to minimize the host response by assessing adsorbed cell morphology and tissue histology. However, these techniques do not adequately predict in vivo glucose sensor function, necessitating sensor performance evaluation in a relevant animal model prior to human testing. Herein, the effects of critical experimental parameters, including the animal model and data processing methods, on the reliability and usefulness of preclinical sensor performance data are considered.

[1]  G. S. Wilson,et al.  Introduction to the Glucose Sensing Problem , 2009 .

[2]  Andreas Pfützner,et al.  Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects. , 2012, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[3]  F. Clubb,et al.  Swine as Models in Biomedical Research and Toxicology Testing , 2012, Veterinary pathology.

[4]  W. Reichert,et al.  Macrophage embedded fibrin gels: an in vitro platform for assessing inflammation effects on implantable glucose sensors. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[5]  Jae Ho Shin,et al.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices. , 2013, Chemical reviews.

[6]  Omar Antar,et al.  Cell based metabolic barriers to glucose diffusion: macrophages and continuous glucose monitoring. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[7]  B Wayne Bequette,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Real-Time Algorithms for Calibration, Filtering, and Alarms , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[8]  G. Reaven,et al.  Nongenetic mouse models of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1998, Metabolism: clinical and experimental.

[9]  Buddy D. Ratner,et al.  Porous Implants Modulate Healing and Induce Shifts in Local Macrophage Polarization in the Foreign Body Reaction , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Giridharan Gokulrangan,et al.  Mediation of in vivo glucose sensor inflammatory response via nitric oxide release. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[11]  U. Klueh,et al.  Impact of macrophage deficiency and depletion on continuous glucose monitoring in vivo. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[12]  B H Ginsberg,et al.  A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[13]  P. Turner,et al.  Administration of substances to laboratory animals: routes of administration and factors to consider. , 2011, Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS.

[14]  John J. Mastrototaro,et al.  An electroenzymatic glucose sensor fabricated on a flexible substrate , 1991 .

[15]  D. Bellinger,et al.  Swine models of type 2 diabetes mellitus: insulin resistance, glucose tolerance, and cardiovascular complications. , 2006, ILAR journal.

[16]  C. Goodman,et al.  Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health , 1988 .

[17]  Boris P Kovatchev,et al.  Graphical and numerical evaluation of continuous glucose sensing time lag. , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[18]  M. Schoenfisch,et al.  In Vivo Analytical Performance of Nitric Oxide-Releasing Glucose Biosensors , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  J. Brauker,et al.  Analysis of time lags and other sources of error of the DexCom SEVEN continuous glucose monitor. , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[20]  D. Howey,et al.  In vivo evaluation of an electroenzymatic glucose sensor implanted in subcutaneous tissue. , 1992, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[21]  G. S. Wilson,et al.  Design and in vitro studies of a needle-type glucose sensor for subcutaneous monitoring. , 1991, Analytical chemistry.

[22]  Bruce Klitzman,et al.  Implant Healing in Experimental Animal Models of Diabetes , 2011, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[23]  G. S. Wilson,et al.  Modification of the sensitivity of glucose sensor implanted into subcutaneous tissue. , 1996, Diabetes & metabolism.

[24]  W M Reichert,et al.  Engineering the tissue which encapsulates subcutaneous implants. III. Effective tissue response times. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[25]  U. Klueh,et al.  Murine model of implantable glucose sensors: a novel model for glucose sensor development. , 2005, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[26]  Savita Khanna,et al.  Characterization of a preclinical model of chronic ischemic wound. , 2009, Physiological genomics.

[27]  F. Papadimitrakopoulos,et al.  Microsphere erosion in outer hydrogel membranes creating macroscopic porosity to counter biofouling-induced sensor degradation. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  Heidi E Koschwanez,et al.  In vitro, in vivo and post explantation testing of glucose-detecting biosensors: current methods and recommendations. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[29]  U. Ungerstedt,et al.  Analyte flux through chronically implanted subcutaneous polyamide membranes differs in humans and rats. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[30]  G. S. Wilson,et al.  Calibration of a subcutaneous amperometric glucose sensor. Part 1. Effect of measurement uncertainties on the determination of sensor sensitivity and background current. , 2002, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[31]  R. Freeman,et al.  Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[32]  Wheat Lj Infection and diabetes mellitus. , 1979, The Western journal of medicine.

[33]  W M Reichert,et al.  Engineering the tissue which encapsulates subcutaneous implants. I. Diffusion properties. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[34]  D. Cox,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of continuous glucose-monitoring sensors: continuous glucose-error grid analysis illustrated by TheraSense Freestyle Navigator data. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[35]  D. Cox,et al.  Evaluating Clinical Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose , 1987, Diabetes Care.

[36]  N. Schaper,et al.  Diabetes: impaired damage control , 2011, Diabetologia.

[37]  Leslie C. Sherwood,et al.  Creating a Long-Term Diabetic Rabbit Model , 2010, Experimental diabetes research.

[38]  N. Gretz,et al.  Biocompatibility of an electrochemical sensor for continuous glucose monitoring in subcutaneous tissue. , 2005, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[39]  William M Reichert,et al.  Modeling the relative impact of capsular tissue effects on implanted glucose sensor time lag and signal attenuation , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[40]  W M Reichert,et al.  Engineering the tissue which encapsulates subcutaneous implants. II. Plasma-tissue exchange properties. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[41]  G. S. Wilson,et al.  Calibration of a subcutaneous amperometric glucose sensor implanted for 7 days in diabetic patients. Part 2. Superiority of the one-point calibration method. , 2002, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[42]  T. Fahey,et al.  Diabetes impairs the late inflammatory response to wound healing. , 1991, The Journal of surgical research.

[43]  R. Gifford,et al.  Continuous glucose monitoring: 40 years, what we've learned and what's next. , 2013, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[44]  Shaoyi Jiang,et al.  Zwitterionic hydrogels implanted in mice resist the foreign-body reaction , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.