The effect of age of acquisition in visual word processing: further evidence for the semantic hypothesis.

The authors investigated whether the meaning of visually presented words is activated faster for early-acquired words than for late-acquired words. They addressed the issue using the semantic Simon paradigm. In this paradigm, participants are instructed to decide whether a stimulus word is printed in uppercase or lowercase letters. However, they have to respond with a verbal label ("living" or "nonliving") that is either congruent with the meaning of the word (e.g., saying "living" to the stimulus DOG) or incongruent (e.g., saying "nonliving" to the stimulus dog). Results showed a significant congruency effect that was stronger for early-acquired words than for late-acquired words. The authors conclude that the age of acquisition is an important variable in the activation of the meaning of visually presented words.

[1]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  Challenging the widespread assumption that connectionism and distributed representations go hand-in-hand , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  M Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[4]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 2332 Dutch words from 49 different semantic categories , 2003 .

[5]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[6]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Geoffrey B. Duggan,et al.  Age of Acquisition, Ageing, and Verb Production: Normative and Experimental Data , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  J. Houwer.  THE SEMANTIC SIMON EFFECT , 1998 .

[9]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Exploring a neural-network account of age-of-acquisition effects using repetition priming of faces , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Age of Acquisition Effects in Word Reading and Other Tasks , 2002 .

[11]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  ROLES OF WORD FREQUENCY AND AGE OF ACQUISITION IN WORD NAMING AND LEXICAL DECISION , 1995 .

[12]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French: Relationships with psycholinguistic variables, the English data from Morrison et al. (1997), and naming latencies , 2003 .

[14]  R. Ratcliff.  Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Cristina Izura,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in word recognition and production in first and second languages , 2002 .

[16]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[17]  S. Gerhand,et al.  Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise. , 1998 .

[18]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  The Large-Scale Structure of Semantic Networks: Statistical Analyses and a Model of Semantic Growth , 2001, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Age of acquisition in face categorisation: is there an instance-based account? , 1999, Cognition.