Optimization Framework and Parameter Determination for Proximity-Based Device Discovery in D2D Communication Systems

One of the most important processes in device-to-device communications of cellular devices is that of discovery, which determines the proximity of devices. When a discovery process is performed, there are several parameters to determine, including the discovery range, the discovery period, and the modulation and coding scheme of the discovery messages. In this paper, we address the relationships between these parameters and describe an optimization framework to determine them. In the proposed procedure, it is important to first optimize the discovery rate, which is defined as the number of discoverable devices per unit time. Once the discovery rate is maximized, the discovery period can be determined accordingly based on the device density and the target discovery range. Since the discovery rate is not affected by many of discovery parameters such as the discovery range, the device density, and the discovery period, it can be used as a performance metric for comparing discovery schemes with different discovery ranges or different discovery periods.

[1]  Bin Guo,et al.  Graph-Based Resource Allocation for D2D Communications Underlying Cellular Networks in Multiuser Scenario , 2014 .

[2]  Chung Gu Kang,et al.  Adaptive yielding scheme for link scheduling in OFDM-based synchronous device-to-device (D2D) communication system , 2014, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[3]  Shaohui Sun,et al.  Discovery of device-device proximity: Physical layer design for D2D discovery , 2013, 2013 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China - Workshops (CIC/ICCC).

[4]  Andreas Kunz,et al.  Energy-Efficient D2D Discovery for Proximity Services in 3GPP LTE-Advanced Networks: ProSe Discovery Mechanisms , 2014, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[5]  Sunghyun Choi,et al.  Analysis of Device-to-Device discovery and link setup in LTE networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE 24th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[6]  Jianjun Wu,et al.  Resource Management for Device-to-Device Communications in Heterogeneous Networks Using Stackelberg Game , 2014 .

[7]  Po-Kai Huang,et al.  Energy efficient and scalable device-to-device discovery protocol with fast discovery , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communications and Networking (SECON).

[8]  Hongqiang Zhai,et al.  Physical Carrier Sensing and Spatial Reuse in Multirate and Multihop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[9]  Hui Wang,et al.  Network-Coded Relaying in Multiuser Multicast D2D Network , 2014 .

[10]  Stefan Parkvall,et al.  Design aspects of network assisted device-to-device communications , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  Junyi Li,et al.  FlashLinQ: enabling a mobile proximal internet , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[12]  Hung-Yu Wei,et al.  Bio-Inspired Proximity Discovery and Synchronization for D2D Communications , 2013, IEEE Communications Letters.

[13]  Kari Pajukoski,et al.  On the design of discovery patterns for half-duplex TDD nodes operating in frame-based systems , 2013, 2013 Future Network & Mobile Summit.

[14]  Chung Gu Kang,et al.  Interference mitigation and D2D parameter estimation for distributed-control D2D underlay systems , 2017, Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol..

[15]  Carl Wijting,et al.  Device-to-device communication as an underlay to LTE-advanced networks , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  Sanjay Shakkottai,et al.  FlashLinQ: A synchronous distributed scheduler for peer-to-peer ad hoc networks , 2010, 2010 48th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[17]  Zhu Han,et al.  Device-to-Device Discovery for Proximity-Based Service in LTE-Advanced System , 2015, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.