A comparison of vibrotactile thresholds on the finger obtained with ISO type equipment and Japanese equipment.

A vibrotactile threshold measurement system that enables the thresholds at the fingertips to be determined more rapidly and precisely has been developed. This system was studied to assess the impact of various factors on the obtained values. An experiment using two different types of equipment was also conducted to assess the repeatability of measurement. One system was similar to that required by International Standard (System A), and the other system was of the currently used in Japan (System B). The subjects were nine males and one female, measurements were taken on three different days. This paper compares the structure of the equipment used internationally (ISO/CD13091) and the equipment typically used in Japan and the measurements of vibrotactile thresholds taken at a 125 Hz frequency using Systems A and B. The measurement method and conditions adopted were almost the same as those outlined in the ISO draft. The results of this experiment showed that there were some differences between the two systems. The vibrotactile thresholds measured using System B showed higher values than did those measured using System A. The results also indicated that equipment that satisfies ISO standards provides sufficient repeatability for use as a diagnostic aid. Also, this paper is shown the vibrotactile measurement equipment conditions must be considered when using vibrotactile threshold measurement equipment in Japan.

[1]  M J Griffin,et al.  A comparison of vibrotactile thresholds on the finger obtained with different equipment. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[2]  M J Griffin,et al.  Factors influencing vibration sense thresholds used to assess occupational exposures to hand transmitted vibration. , 1991, British journal of industrial medicine.

[3]  I Pyykkö,et al.  Digital vibrogram: a new diagnostic tool for sensory testing in compression neuropathy. , 1986, The Journal of hand surgery.

[4]  I Pyykkö,et al.  A new principle for assessing vibrotactile sense in vibration-induced neuropathy. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[5]  S Watanabe,et al.  Temporary threshold shift of vibratory sensation after clasping a vibrating handle , 1981, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[6]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[7]  M J Griffin,et al.  Measures of vibrotactile sensitivity in persons exposed to hand-arm vibration. , 1986, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[8]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Handbook of Human Vibration , 1990 .

[9]  J. E. Piercy,et al.  Assessment of impaired tactile sensation. A pilot study. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[10]  N Harada [Studies on the changes in the vibratory sensation threshold at the fingertip in relation to some physical parameters of exposed vibration. Part 1. A study on the methods of vibration exposure and measurement of the vibratory sensation threshold (author's transl)]. , 1978, Nihon eiseigaku zasshi. Japanese journal of hygiene.