Speech Recognition Technology and Students With Writing Difficulties: Improving Fluency.

The present study investigated the effects of speech recognition technology (SR) and advance planning on children's writing processes. Fluent and less fluent writers, ages 11 to 14, composed 4 narratives, via handwriting and SR, both with and without advance planning. Less fluent children's handwritten narratives were significantly inferior to those of fluent children in terms of length, quality, and surface errors. For less fluent writers, SR (a) significantly increased the length and (b) decreased the surface errors of narratives. Although narrative length related positively to holistic quality, SR did not significantly improve quality. Advance planning helped children to compose more fully developed stories. For children with writing difficulties, advance planning and SR may each independently support text generation.

[1]  Alex Cherry Wilkinson.  Classroom computers and cognitive science , 1983 .

[2]  Robert L. Bangert-Drowns,et al.  The Word Processor as an Instructional Tool: A Meta-Analysis of Word Processing in Writing Instruction , 1993 .

[3]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Learning Disabled Students' Composing Under Three Methods of Text Production , 1987 .

[4]  Patricia A. Popp,et al.  Persisting Problems of Adults with Learning Disabilities , 1990, Journal of learning disabilities.

[5]  Cheryl M. Yates,et al.  Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing , 1992 .

[6]  R. Stiggins,et al.  Creating Writers: Linking Assessment and Writing Instruction , 1989 .

[7]  P. Newcomer,et al.  The Written Composing Ability of Children with Learning Disabilities: A Review of the Literature From 1980 to 1990 , 1991, Journal of learning disabilities.

[8]  S. Graham,et al.  Components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students' compositions and self-efficacy. , 1989 .

[9]  William D. Schafer,et al.  Evaluation of a Writing Instruction Model that Integrated a Process Approach, Strategy Instruction, and Word Processing , 1995 .

[10]  Mary Ross Moran.  A Comparison of Formal Features of Written Language of Learning Disabled, Low-Achieving and Achieving Secondary Students , 1981 .

[11]  G. Rijlaarsdam,et al.  Theories, models and methodology in writing research , 1996 .

[12]  Ann Matsuhashi,et al.  Pausing and Planning: The Tempo of Written Discourse Production , 1981 .

[13]  Suzanne Hidi,et al.  The comparison of oral and written productions in two discourse types , 1983 .

[14]  R. Abbott,et al.  Assessment of planning, translating, and revising in junior high writers , 1996 .

[15]  L. Ramon Veal.  Syntactic Measures and Rated Quality in the Writing of Young Children. Studies in Language Education, Report No. 8. , 1974 .

[16]  Nancie Atwell,et al.  In the Middle : Writing, Reading, and Learning with Adolescents , 1987 .

[17]  C. Michael Levy,et al.  The Science of Writing : Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications , 1996 .

[18]  Hayes.  identifying the organization of wi iiing processes , 1980 .

[19]  Stephen Graham,et al.  Effects of dictation and advanced planning instruction on the composing of students with writing and learning problems. , 1997 .

[20]  K. W. Hunt.  Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. , 1970, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[21]  M. Fayol,et al.  Is Written Language Production more Difficult than Oral Language Production? A Working Memory Approach , 1994 .

[22]  An application of multilevel analysis on writing process data , 1996 .

[23]  Steve Graham,et al.  Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on the composition skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. , 1992 .

[24]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Writing and Writing Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities: Review of a Research Program , 1991 .

[25]  S. Freedman,et al.  An Analysis of Readers' Responses to Essays , 1977 .

[26]  M. Fayol,et al.  Is graphic activity cognitively costly? A developmental approach , 2000 .

[27]  Martin Nystrand,et al.  What writers know : the language, process, and structure of written discourse , 1982 .

[28]  S. Graham.  The Role of Production Factors in Learning Disabled Students' Compositions. , 1990 .

[29]  R. T. Kellogg.  The Psychology of Writing , 1994 .

[30]  Marilyn Cochran-Smith,et al.  Word Processing and Writing in Elementary Classrooms: A Critical Review of Related Literature , 1991 .

[31]  James A. Poteet.  Characteristics of Written Expression of Learning Disabled and Non-Learning Disabled Elementary School Students. , 1979 .

[32]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  The psychology of written composition , 1987 .

[33]  S. Graham,et al.  Cognitive Strategy Instruction in Written Language for Learning Disabled Students , 1992 .

[34]  R. Abbott,et al.  Treatment of Handwriting Problems in Beginning Writers: Transfer from Handwriting to Composition. , 1997 .

[35]  R. T. Kellogg.  Attentional overload and writing performance: effects of rough draft and outline strategies , 1988 .

[36]  Geoff Cumming,et al.  Evaluating speech-based composition methods: Planning, dictation, and the listening word processor. , 1996 .

[37]  Virginia W. Berninger,et al.  Integrating Low- and High-Level Skills in Instructional Protocols for Writing Disabilities , 1995 .

[38]  R. Abbott,et al.  Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. , 1997 .

[39]  Ruth J. Kurth.  Using Word Processing to Enhance Revision Strategies during Student Writing Activities. , 1987 .

[40]  Deborah McCutchen,et al.  Children's discourse skill: Form and modality requirements of schooled writing , 1987 .

[41]  Carol Sue Englert.  A Case for Writing Intervention: Strategies for Writing Informational Text. , 1988 .

[42]  Deborah McCutchen,et al.  Individual Differences in Writing: Implications of Translating Fluency. , 1994 .